tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post2263772401665871954..comments2024-03-28T10:43:26.059+01:00Comments on Eivind Berge's Blog: Wolf, wolfEivind Bergehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comBlogger82125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-91463917869759877342022-02-27T23:07:54.766+01:002022-02-27T23:07:54.766+01:00"AF Says
I remember I sat down on a bench in..."AF Says<br /><br />I remember I sat down on a bench in the main street and within a couple of minutes two pretty teenage girls who must have been about 14 sat next to me, and kept brushing their hair with their hands, looking at me. Obviously I didn't want any part of it, even if the laws at the time were relaxed."<br /><br />I didn't realize the antifeminist was gay, now it makes sense why he deleted his website!<br /><br />The USA would put you in jail for a million years for taking up their offer, but the UK would not, and you passed?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-39089156956679967652022-02-05T13:11:43.789+01:002022-02-05T13:11:43.789+01:00https://twitter.com/PetiteNicoco/status/1488200034...https://twitter.com/PetiteNicoco/status/1488200034306990089<br /><br />Twitter is cracking down on violent antis. Get fucked<br /><br />PS: Eivind and theantifeminist, there's a group of people raiding twitter, mass reporting antis, and defending stephen kershner. They are giving us free twitter accounts they buy every time we get banned. They gave me one, and there's a discord if you want to join. freetheteens69noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-54867493626132779102022-02-04T13:46:48.852+01:002022-02-04T13:46:48.852+01:00The Academic Freedom Alliance supports him:
https...The Academic Freedom Alliance supports him:<br /><br />https://academicfreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/AFA-Letter-to-SUNY-Fredonia-regarding-Stephen-Kershnar.pdf<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-71037169066064861712022-02-04T08:37:11.323+01:002022-02-04T08:37:11.323+01:00Kershnar's university is not standing up for h...Kershnar's university is not standing up for him, to say the least:<br /><br />https://twitter.com/FredoniaU/status/1489339982661701633<br /><br />President freaks out and assigns professor to "duties that do not include his physical presence on campus and [he] will not have contact with students." A bizarre reaction to pedohysteria given that children don't attend university, until you realize that propaganda is integral to feminist power. Have to shield students from contrary views so they can be properly brainwashed with antisex bigotry.<br /><br />A funny blog about it:<br /><br />https://dailynous.com/2022/02/03/kershnar-cycle-reactivated/<br /><br /><i>Every few years, it seems, someone new will learn of the work of philosopher Stephen Kershnar (SUNY Fredonia), share their shock, amusement, or outrage about it on social media, and cause a brief spike in amazed, angry, or humorous commentary about it. Then people move on and tend to forget about it… until someone new learns of it and just has to share it. Call it the Kershnar Cycle.<br /><br />Kershnar Cycles, like hurricanes, come in varying strengths. Typically they’re initiated by a philosopher and their reach does not extend much beyond other philosophers, and so they’re mild. This time, however, it’s more severe, as the cycle appears to have been initiated by a very popular social media account, @LibsofTikTok, which shared a selectively edited video of an interview with Kershnar, titles of some of his articles, and called for him to be fired.</i>Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-39040736371522039282022-02-04T04:56:57.439+01:002022-02-04T04:56:57.439+01:00Sorry it was out of stock at that link, but here i...Sorry it was out of stock at that link, but here it is:<br /><br />https://www.amazon.com/Pedophilia-Adult-Child-Sex-Philosophical-Analysis/dp/1498504450/<br /><br />Normie reviews are so predictable, lol:<br /><br /><i>Jeanne Suski<br />1.0 out of 5 stars<br />It doesn't deserve a star<br />Reviewed in the United States on February 2, 2022<br />I don't even need to purchase it to write a review. The description was all I needed. Disgusting.</i><br /><br />That is indeed how they will and do handle this subject when they get a chance, including the laws, which don't need to be based on any sensible value system or truth whatsoever.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-81890072434392891752022-02-04T04:44:57.534+01:002022-02-04T04:44:57.534+01:00Unfortunately the Kershnar video has now been &quo...Unfortunately the Kershnar video has now been "removed for violating YouTube's Community Guidelines." We are left with this little discussion:<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIp6gTivpKk<br /><br />Where the channel hosts defend having him on, but they sound half-hearted and perhaps scared, as if it was just an academic exercise to them and not expressing real views. It comes down to a faithful declaration that our society's dogmatic belief can't possibly be wrong, despite giving zero reasons for it. With this subject you can evidently demolish ALL the arguments (at least briefly until censorship strikes) and still be left with a strong conviction that it is "wrong" and should she criminalized, even among professional philosophers. It is utterly resistant to rational thinking, which cannot ever be allowed to guide policy as far as the normies are concerned, and it doesn't matter if they lose all the debates because they must have their religious belief in the metaphysical badness of sex and the state violence to back it up.<br /><br />So yes, probably a good idea to buy his book before that is gone too.<br /><br />https://www.amazon.co.uk/Pedophilia-Adult-Child-Sex-Philosophical-Analysis/dp/1498504450/Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-7966884688441310072022-02-02T19:50:43.853+01:002022-02-02T19:50:43.853+01:00A very courageous philosopher. I see from his othe...A very courageous philosopher. I see from his other publications that he is a bit of a contrarian thinker, perhaps playing 'devils advocate' to argue for unpopular positions - such as the legalization of torture, or that military veterans do not 'deserve our gratitude'. Perhaps this will protect him a little from the cancel mob, but it doesn't look like it, maybe even make it more likely he will be silenced. Might be a good idea to order his book from Amazon or elsewhere if you can, before it gets pulled.<br /><br />TBH, I don't think it matters much if the occasional 'feminist' (Judith Levine) or academic publishes a pro male sexuality work, unless in the unlikely event it inspires others to do the same, which becomes ever more unlikely given the times and with cancel culture on top of it. They will make an example of this guy.<br /><br />I really think the incels free speech issue is far more fundamental. The only hope currently is for an 'aggressive' subculture such as the incels to abandon age cuckoldry and paedocrisy, which is what they largely did, but now outside forces appear to be quashing it. It would seem that incels.is recently was taken over by a new management (very possibly the feds themselves), and they really want to neuter the anti age of consent mentality that has taken hold there. Lol, it's probably more important to the Feds and the establishment to stamp out the incel 'agecuck' meme than it is to stamp out the incel violence.The AFnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-65551084082536930142022-02-02T11:20:37.754+01:002022-02-02T11:20:37.754+01:00Full interview with Stephen Kershnar:
https://www...Full interview with Stephen Kershnar:<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFrCHJJqETo<br /><br />Brain in a Vat<br />2.79K subscribers<br />Sexual Taboos | Stephen Kershnar<br />492 views · Jan 30, 2022<br /><br />Should there be an age of consent? Is it wrong to fantasize about someone against their will? Is it wrong to lust after someone because of their race?Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-1474406926172650432022-02-02T03:48:35.449+01:002022-02-02T03:48:35.449+01:00Oh well, there is at least one free speaker left i...Oh well, there is at least one free speaker left in academia:<br /><br />https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1488680421558657024<br /><br />Stephen Kershnar of Fredonia State University tells it as it is. Incredibly refreshing to encounter total honesty about sex in an age of hysterical lying and censorship.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-15684075693236418772022-02-01T20:48:04.989+01:002022-02-01T20:48:04.989+01:00It's over for malesexualistcels - incels.is br...It's over for malesexualistcels - incels.is bring in new rules banning 'discussion of paedophilia'. https://incels.is/threads/new-incels-is-rule-announcement-regulation-of-child-erotica-and-discussion-of-paedophilia.351198/<br /><br />Agecucked paedocrites not having it all their own way though. Here is one example of the anger it's caused :<br /><br />"For this website to become more cucked than 4chan... Never thought I'd see the day, "blackpill" my ass, keep on sucking on feminism's cock.<br /><br />Well then, guess I'll be taking my leave soon enough because fuck, I've got principles."<br /><br />Maybe we could invite them all here? Except Eivind and FreeTheTeens will call them losers, wankers, and misogynists.The AFnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-83369511972393548882022-01-31T20:25:58.118+01:002022-01-31T20:25:58.118+01:00To illustrate the difference, the Norwegian age of...To illustrate the difference, the Norwegian age of consent law doesn't even mention an exception for close in age (they just apply it discretionarily):<br /><br />https://lovdata.no/lov/2005-05-20-28/§302<br /><br />But the child pornography law does:<br /><br />https://lovdata.no/lov/2005-05-20-28/§311<br /><br /><i>Straffen kan falle bort for den som tar og besitter et bilde av en person mellom 16 og 18 år, dersom denne har gitt sitt samtykke og de to er omtrent jevnbyrdige i alder og utvikling.</i><br /><br />"The punishment may not be imposed" is a very different way to put it; a hysterical need to make it clear that it is still illegal for a 17-year-old to possess a lewd picture of another 17-year-old who consented to it, unlike hiding a family member who committed mass murder. And under 16 there is no stated exemption. May = may not, so there is no absolute rule either, unlike the categorical statement about terrorism.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-73234551245605793762022-01-31T13:02:25.989+01:002022-01-31T13:02:25.989+01:00Also the age of consent is almost like you suggest...Also the age of consent is almost like you suggest harboring a terrorist would be for family (where they don't punish people close in age or development even though they can't resist making it technically illegal), but that's because it is a crimen exceptum due to antisex hysteria. That sort of thinking has not caught up with terrorism, which is still considered nothing compared to sex crimes.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-45099552765990592872022-01-31T12:51:04.926+01:002022-01-31T12:51:04.926+01:00I think there are some laws in some countries that...I think there are some laws in some countries that prohibit some things without punishing them. I seem to recall abortion in Germany or something at some point. But that is different. I believe what we are talking about here is legal because there are strong moral reasons for having them be legal (unlike things like abortion -- which isn't a moral good like family loyalty, but for which punishment is also bad).Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-40647475801164652762022-01-31T12:45:25.900+01:002022-01-31T12:45:25.900+01:00No, I take that as can't be charged either (or...No, I take that as can't be charged either (or theoretically the cops might try, but the charges would have to be dismissed without a trial). What is the point of charging or trying somebody who can't be sentenced to any punishment whatsoever? I believe it is *legal* to hide a terrorist you are closely related to or who is your significant other.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-50998428552790239632022-01-31T12:23:17.437+01:002022-01-31T12:23:17.437+01:00Den som har gitt bistand som nevnt i første ledd t...<i>Den som har gitt bistand som nevnt i første ledd til en av sine nærmeste, straffes ikke."</i><br /><br />Straffes ikke, men måske kan vedkommende blive dømt alligevel uden idømmelse af straf?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-13478872459732443512022-01-31T10:44:58.565+01:002022-01-31T10:44:58.565+01:00Not just everything we did, but also everything we...Not just everything we did, but also everything we didn't do, which is to say every thought in our heads since the 1970s (or earlier if you are older) that can be construed as a sex crime must be prosecuted. Do these people stop to wonder how many people would be left in the world, if their project were successful, who is still not a sex offender? At this point we might as well prosecute everybody for original sin, because there is no difference. The entire world is incriminated in sexual abuse. To wrap my mind around the sense of priority that must go into thinking it is acceptable to prosecute an alleged ignoring of sexual abuse in the 1970s, as if all the historical accusations of sexual acts weren't enough... this is what we today expend resources on... this is what we ruin people's lives for, or what is left of them in old age, when any supposed "victims" are also old. And the normies think this is normal. It is normal to have such an absurd belief in the badness of sex that this is expected police predation. It is unthinkable that a witness to a murder would be prosecuted in 2021 for failing to come forward in the 1970s, and highly unlikely for contemporary murder witnesses for that matter. But for "sex abuse," anything goes. This is even a family member he was supposed to have turned in back then, his own father. Do Australians not have protections from having to testify against family? Or is this yet another exception for sex?<br /><br />To put it into perspective... In the Norwegian Penal Code there is an exception for those who don't report even the worst possible terrorist acts committed by a family member, like something Breivik did after the fact and even harboring the terrorist:<br /><br />https://lovdata.no/lov/2005-05-20-28/§137<br /><br /><i>§ 137. Medvirkning til unndragning fra straff for terrorhandlinger<br />Med fengsel inntil 6 år straffes den som transporterer, skjuler eller på annen måte medvirker til at noen som har begått en straffbar handling som nevnt i §§ 131, 134, 135 eller §§ 138 til 144, unndrar seg strafforfølgningen eller en idømt straff.<br /><br /><b>Den som har gitt bistand som nevnt i første ledd til en av sine nærmeste, straffes ikke.</b></i><br /><br />Presumably the Australians have something similar for everything except sex, or would have if they have ever been a remotely civilized country. But not sex anymore, because that is the <i>crimen exceptum</i>. The lightest sexual touch (or communication or representation or thought) is worse than the worst terrorist act. Our culture is literally that fucked up.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-4469753075602798062022-01-31T08:48:04.245+01:002022-01-31T08:48:04.245+01:00Scorched earth against sexuality makes yet another...Scorched earth against sexuality makes yet another leap: not even historic "sex abuse" but historic <i>concealment</i> of "sex abuse":<br /><br />https://edition.cnn.com/2022/01/30/australia/hillsong-church-australia-charges-intl-hnk/index.html<br /><br /><i>Hillsong Church founder Brian Houston said on Sunday he is stepping down from all ministry responsibilities to prepare to "vigorously defend" against Australian police charges that he concealed sex abuse of a young man in the 1970s.<br /><br />In August, the 67-year-old Houston was charged with concealing child sex abuse by his late father, Frank Houston, an allegation he strenuously denied....<br /><br />The police said last year that Houston knew information relating to the sexual abuse of a young male in the 1970s and failed to bring it to the attention of police.</i><br /><br />That's it. Allegedly knowing about "sex abuse" but failing to report it 50 years ago is now enough to get charged. I don't think it can ever reach a point where they will concede it has gone too far. The normies sincerely want to destroy the world over sexuality and will get their wish unless we collapse first by other means.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-51877732408960414712022-01-30T21:31:10.084+01:002022-01-30T21:31:10.084+01:00Now I am going to address something the AF just sa...Now I am going to address something the AF just said in the previous thread, that you are not a “real alpha” if you use such cunning schemes to get laid. That’s not a fair statement, is it? I mean it is honestly philosophically flawed: I'm not kidding or asking for validation because alphas don’t care about that; we simply live life by the pussy. Loopholes are part of the world and will always be because no complex system is perfect and new exploits are created even by efforts to close the old. Hackers still get credit for exploiting weaknesses in systems, which is indeed the only way they can hack, contrary to their mythos which is supernatural if you know how computers work. The sexual equivalent is the same. Alpha is as alpha does, i.e. have sex with hot girls, and the less obvious pathways to that are equally valid. Yes, they are “cunning” if you examine the details and demystify them, but so what? There is beauty and power in spotting weaknesses that others assume don’t exist, <b>and having the balls to exploit them</b>, and some girls will be attracted to that.<br /><br />I leveraged an attack by the police into compensation money and ongoing fame, so I know a thing or two about exploits against the feminist state. Such weaknesses are very real and the only unexploitable system I have ever encountered is Bitcoin. Bitcoin is divine for having no flaws, a gateway to the platonic realm as I have written previously, but mortal systems always have bugs, some of which can work in your favor.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-69159123549860037082022-01-30T20:48:06.723+01:002022-01-30T20:48:06.723+01:00My self-registration scheme is also a great idea, ...My self-registration scheme is also a great idea, but it requires collective action to be effective. This is totally the opposite because it helps the first man who tries it achieve his ultimate goal (and to a lesser extent affect politics too, while the former was pure political signaling). I have nothing less than discovered a zero-day exploit in the feminist AI. Its designers thought they were clever for making the system pay for accusations. The explicit purpose is to persecute more sex, and to increase false accusations is a feature they don’t mind or even intended too, but they did not foresee that the same rewards can also pay for REAL sex that hasn’t happened yet and thus serve as an incentive for male sexualist goals rather than feminist ones!<br /><br />This is extremely powerful stuff, downright kryptonite against the feminist state. For a broke suicidal incel it would be a no-brainer to let the state pay so he can have sex. He can go from empty hands to a sure promise of $13,000 for licking a pussy just by invoking this simple exploit. And who knows, maybe the girl wouldn’t even want to accuse and be a girlfriend instead.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-55434296602200722972022-01-30T11:07:01.002+01:002022-01-30T11:07:01.002+01:00The possible (perhaps overhyped/engineered) Russia...The possible (perhaps overhyped/engineered) Russia - Ukraine war was mentioned. One outcome is likely to be millions of single young Ukrainian women moving to the West. Obviously, the same feminist Left who opened their arms to millions of single young Syrian men will be demanding we halt this wave of refugees, probably under the pretence that they will be 'trafficked' into prostitution etc.<br /><br />Another possible outcome is (leaving aside the issue of mass migration of refugees) a huge imbalance in the young male/female ratio, possibly of both nations.<br /><br />I believe Ukraine has 'tightened' its laws recently, just as Russia has (mandatory life sentences for 'paedophiles' etc). When I was in Kyiv a few years ago, I regularly saw girls who looked as young as 12 with 40 year old Turkish tourists. I remember I sat down on a bench in the main street and within a couple of minutes two pretty teenage girls who must have been about 14 sat next to me, and kept brushing their hair with their hands, looking at me. Obviously I didn't want any part of it, even if the laws at the time were relaxed. A couple of minutes later, two middle-aged Turkish sex tourists stopped as they passed by and offered to buy the girls a meal, which they readily accepted, went off with the Turkish men, and as they did so looked back at me in dissapointment that I hadn't made the same offer.<br /><br />Still, unlike most Western countries, Ukraian girls still start university at 17, so whatever the law says, they feel as though they are adults at 17.The AFnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-79760400192062172712022-01-30T10:59:15.005+01:002022-01-30T10:59:15.005+01:00What do we think of your latest cunning plan? Well...What do we think of your latest cunning plan? Well, as with your other big tactical ideas (such as 'voluntarilly registering as sex offenders'), err... you go first Eivind.The AFnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-66300671198573871042022-01-30T00:09:14.629+01:002022-01-30T00:09:14.629+01:00It’s an interesting thought experiment how a “sex ...It’s an interesting thought experiment how a “sex abuse” trial would play out if it was clear the “victim” girls deliberately had sex to collect damages from the state in cooperation with the accused man -- that he simply paid them with evidence that the abuse industry inadvertently has made valuable, in effect making him the next Epstein without being rich -- oh, the irony! A highly pragmatic way to have a mutually beneficial relationship, with even built-in money laundering as the loot is tax-free in Norway. Since the rules are so clear, your confederatesses almost certainly would be paid, but how would “moral” values be affected after that? Would the authorities feel cucked and try to change the rules to prevent this from happening again? Would the media coverage and verdicts on the “abuse” still read like sincere declarations of innocent victimhood, with “underage” girls always and by definition pure as the driven snow? Most likely it would be dismissed as another “grooming” scheme in which the girls bear zero responsibility no matter how enthusiastic. But somehow I think the cucks would be left with a bitter taste in their mouths, because the man got exactly what he wanted at their expense and the girls laugh all the way to the bank too. Not enough to change mores and ascribe agency to young teen girls, but enough to mock the feminists so it stings, and such a bright example for other men and girls to follow until society does wise up.<br /><br />How does my esteemed sexualist readership think this would be received?Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-84044083824817374362022-01-29T21:27:40.013+01:002022-01-29T21:27:40.013+01:00I really cannot think of a way to cuck them harder...I really cannot think of a way to cuck them harder than this... Imagine all the feminist agecucks who have to pay taxes so I can have the pussy they are trying to suppress... We could get maybe 100 "victims" together before accusing, which makes 1.3 million dollars. I can take great care to help them prepare all the evidence they need, upon which I don't even have to be alive for their successful compensation claims. Sure, 1.3 million is nothing by American standards, which are up to $490 million for a single "abuser" now:<br /><br />https://edition.cnn.com/2022/01/29/sport/university-of-michigan-robert-anderson-victims-intl-spt/index.html<br /><br />But by Norwegian standards, it would be excellent.<br /><br />And about that article... another high hysteria mark, now to include NFL players too! "HAIL TO THE VICTIMS!" like it says on that man's shirt. At this point they should just rebrand universities to sexual abuse awareness camps since that's all they do anyway. Accusations pay your way, so don't worry about tuition or getting a job later.<br /><br />It is another one of those belatedly defined abuse cases:<br /><br /><i>Vaughn said it took years for him to even recognize what had happened to him as abuse, and that in communities of color, "for men to even discuss their abuse is seen as a weakness. In those communities, you're forced to be tough and strong."</i><br /><br />And look, they even got the college president:<br /><br /><i>Schlissel -- who was fired this month from his position as President following an anonymous complaint suggesting that he "may have been involved in an inappropriate relationship with a University employee" -- has apologized for Anderson's "tragic misconduct," and said in a statement that the university is committed to resolving victims' claims.</i><br /><br />An "anonymous complaint" that he "may have" been involved in an "inappropriate relationship"... The horror! The tragedy! We clearly need to funnel all of society's resources to the victims, but who says we can't have some more fun along the way?<br /><br />I recall the "one in four" statistic from my own college days which was invented by Mary Koss, but by fudging the definitions and categories some more the feminists are now up to a 65.1% victim rate! Hurrah! All hail our new ruling class!<br /><br /><i>The overall survey found that the 33 schools surveyed, more than half of undergraduate women (59.2%) and transgender, genderqueer, and non-binary students (65.1%) reported experiencing at least one harassing behavior.<br /><br />"I speak to a lot of students, many of them feel like with the assaults that have happened to them, that the university has not been able to deal with it properly," Charlie Kolean, chairman of Michigan Students Against Sexual Assault told CNN.<br /><br />"Typically, a case will not be criminally referred. And additionally, a lot of survivors from assault, they don't want to go through the university's process reporting the assault, because it is fairly arduous," he added.<br /><br />Emma Sandberg, a former student and founder of activism group Roe v. Rape told CNN: "Overall, it is very difficult to be a survivor at U of M. The sexual assault prevention center doesn't provide any real resources, university leadership has engaged in sexual misconduct themselves, and those who go through the all-consuming Title IX process are traumatized by it and rarely receive justice, support, or validation.</i>Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-23610850481940227342022-01-29T20:41:59.310+01:002022-01-29T20:41:59.310+01:00It is genius! Leverage the abuse industry to get n...It is genius! Leverage the abuse industry to get not just pussy but the most premium pussy! Turn their energy on themselves for precisely the opposite purpose. Why didn't I think of this before?<br /><br />As a disclaimer this is written as a joke, but I would literally do it if it were feasible. Hmm...Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-37962802644602756702022-01-29T20:30:45.093+01:002022-01-29T20:30:45.093+01:00I wonder if this can be turned on the abuse indust...I wonder if this can be turned on the abuse industry...<br /><br />I don't have 13,000 dollars, so I can't pay the compensation, but I think the state will step in and pay the "victims." So... I could strike a deal with girls where we plan this as their revenue source for me licking their pussies and more :)<br /><br />Leverage the abuse industry itself to get sex. We can plan to wait until I've had a good run before accusing too, after which I don't much care what happens because I've had enough pussy for twenty lifetimes. Aren't I smart or what? <3Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.com