tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post3724092607642653..comments2024-03-25T10:13:23.077+01:00Comments on Eivind Berge's Blog: Metaphysical interludeEivind Bergehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comBlogger58125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-79941219666978684042020-03-18T18:04:22.609+01:002020-03-18T18:04:22.609+01:00Hi Øyvind, long time no see! Yep, Gail is looking ...Hi Øyvind, long time no see! Yep, Gail is looking more right every day now, doesn't she? I just recorded a little statement on this myself:<br /><br />https://youtu.be/cac586VTodAEivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-80657007456023636352020-03-18T17:46:06.521+01:002020-03-18T17:46:06.521+01:00I dag traff jammen deflasjons-spøkelset meg igjen ...I dag traff jammen deflasjons-spøkelset meg igjen midt i magen som et rekyl:<br /><br />http://permaliv.blogspot.com/2020/03/dei-siste-fossemllingar-iii.htmlØyvind Holmstadhttp://permaliv.blogspot.com/2020/03/dei-siste-fossemllingar-iii.htmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-83417067937062112992020-03-15T15:56:57.970+01:002020-03-15T15:56:57.970+01:00Yes, the right-wing men are just as bad as the fem...Yes, the right-wing men are just as bad as the feminists and possibly worse. It is incredible that it is now considered "cool" to be anti-sex across the entire political spectrum and even among extremist groups who otherwise think of themselves as manly. Don't these "men" have a sex drive themselves? Do they only live vicariously via their daughters' imaginary innocence?Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-82857083101458500642020-03-15T03:59:02.027+01:002020-03-15T03:59:02.027+01:00This is a great article and required reading for a...This is a great article and required reading for any man:<br /><br />https://dailystormer.su/neo-nazi-white-knights-go-all-in-on-defending-the-honor-of-women-who-had-sex-with-harvey-weinstein/<br /><br />Just replace “Neo-Nazi” with “bluepilled man” and it applies to almost all Western men, feminist liberals and feminist conservatives alike. The author nails it right on the head, exactly what I’ve been saying, about how the right wing is even more cucked than the left. Mostly in the form of “my innocent little child angel daughter was exploited, abused, raped and trafficked by the big bad pervert man”. And in the case of feminist conservative women, “my innocent little child angel son…” which results in the female sex offender charade.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-16829492256683775992020-03-12T23:14:32.135+01:002020-03-12T23:14:32.135+01:00At least the normies found Weinstein not guilty on...At least the normies found Weinstein not guilty on the most serious charges, but the judge didn't respect that and imposed the near maximum sentence on the little bit he got, which also shows due process has been abandoned. So yeah, the problem goes both ways, but far more from the top down. It also took two trials to get Cosby convicted and it was a tiny scrap compared to all the accusations.<br /><br />20 years is a too long time frame to make plans, in my opinion. Business as usual already appears to be over and whatever happens next will play out fast. The time to leave... is probably too late. But by all means make the best of whatever opportunities are left.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-41484706636857181192020-03-12T22:12:49.713+01:002020-03-12T22:12:49.713+01:00The thing about Weinstein is he was convicted by a...The thing about Weinstein is he was convicted by a jury of normies in NYC. Same with Cosby, convicted by a jury of normies in Pennsylvania. So we know the problem is not just top down, it's also bottom up. Basically, "the public sucks, fuck hope" -George Carlin.<br /><br />However, all places in the world are not the same culturally. Eventually, the smartest men will leave America to go where they are more welcomed, leaving only the low IQ behind. This will cause the country to decline in every way, eventually until it is no longer powerful, and cannot culturally influence other places anymore. The timeframe for this is probably 20 years. This scenario gives me hope, as I am one of those men :)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-6409553379153451592020-03-12T09:34:07.450+01:002020-03-12T09:34:07.450+01:00I am particularly rooting for collapse of the econ...I am particularly rooting for collapse of the economy. So the wealth that the antisex bigots hope to extract from men like Epstein and Weinstein won't be there for them to collect. Or even the resources to <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/11/us/harvey-weinstein-sentence/index.html" rel="nofollow">lock men up for 23 years</a> for every time a woman had a dick in her mouth that she comes to regret when she no longer has any use for a relationship. <br /><br />When seeing the entitled cuntrags' <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/11/opinions/prince-andrew-epstein-cooperation-queen-elizabeth-prince/index.html" rel="nofollow">vindictive screeds for infinite retribution because a 17-year-old girl was paid good money to have sex</a> continue even today...<br /><br />It becomes all too clear that the world needs a monster to give the feminists real problems instead.<br /><br />And it might finally have arrived.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-58927299405984081662020-03-12T04:20:01.555+01:002020-03-12T04:20:01.555+01:00I'm really excited about this brand new virus....I'm really excited about this brand new virus. It won't deliver us from the ghoulish grip of Feminists and their manservants, but things are going to get shakey-shakey for the system, and I'm in favor of that prospect. I'm rooting for high infection rates worldwide.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-59495651652650669792020-03-11T03:04:35.682+01:002020-03-11T03:04:35.682+01:00It is true almost by definition that the boys who ...It is true almost by definition that the boys who get lucky with older women such as teachers are usually the alphas. However, this does not change the fact that the female sex offender charade is the most bizarre travesty of justice in history, deserving of our utmost attention for so many reasons ranging from the injustice of it to the absurdity and lessons in human irrationality that it provides. And remember that the less popular boys at least have the option to pay for sex from women who are also persecuted by the feminist police state. Somehow prostitutes seem to be much less frequently put on trial for sex with underage boys than teachers, probably because there are less boastful rumors going around to incriminate them, but the feminists would love to persecute them too if they could and the laws are certainly ready for it and must be fought by everyone who cares about sexual justice.<br /><br />I did not mean to imply that financial or societal collapse can bring about a sexual utopia. Collapse will be horrible, but at least the antisex bigots will also suffer. That is perhaps the only consolation we can hope for in our lifetimes. Survivors may be able to rebuild a civilization without the feminist sex laws, but we won't be among them because the antisex bigotry is now so entrenched that it would take a near total replacement of the population to get anything different, whether by time or a sudden dieoff that will probably kill us too. And no, transhumanism is far from inevitable; more likely there will be a technological setback. It is no more inevitable that our technology keeps progressing to the Singularity than is was for the Romans or any other civilization. If anything seems to be inevitable, it would be collapse and another dark ages.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-39542118470760663162020-03-08T22:24:28.968+01:002020-03-08T22:24:28.968+01:00Eivind seems to assume that the lucky boys these M...Eivind seems to assume that the lucky boys these MILF teachers are banging are the shy, virgin incels, of the type he once was - delivering them from inceldom.<br /><br />I rather doubt it.<br /><br />More than likely in 9 out 10 cases it's the Alpha Chad, who is also banging all the hot chicks in his class too.<br /><br />BTW Eivind, whereas I look to something that is inevitable and potentially positive - transhumanism - as a small glimmer of hope, you appear to be hoping that the coronavirus brings about a breakdown in society while killing millions of people (primarily the older generation who are the only ones who can still remember what society was like before feminism and paedohysteria).<br /><br />I don't entirely doubt this could bring about the collapse of society and a Mad Max type environment.<br /><br />What leaves me almost speechless is the idea that you can actually think that such a scenario is something to be hoped for and might suddenly bring about a sexual utopia. You may want to Google some Mexican cartel gore videos to get an idea of whats in store for us 'nonces' in 12 months time if and when the rule of law breaks down and power becomes localized and fought over between the most violent gangs of thugs and criminals.theantifeministhttp://theantifeminist.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-48807029703507399812020-03-08T06:41:28.491+01:002020-03-08T06:41:28.491+01:00What probably happened to Leah Cordice is that she...What probably happened to Leah Cordice is that she was incriminated in connection with her pregnancy, due to naively stating who the father was, not knowing that this society hates sexuality so much that it will even persecute teenagers for having sex with each other. Only if she went to the police on her own accord to accuse rape does an attack on her become applicable. Assuming she didn't do that, she was just dragged into a situation where the abuse industry must have its pound of flesh. That is a situation more hateful than any human can conceive on his own, because the entire system thus grinds in order to destroy the people it has swallowed according to its hateful antisex algorithms. You cannot blame her for not coming up with a sex-positive defense, because none is possible in that framework. Sure, as a male sexualist I would go for jury nullification, but that is not realistic nor does it occur to normal people. And you have to understand they also put her on trial for sex after she was 18, which would have produced a much longer sentence. The antisex bigots were determined to destroy her life, and though false rape accusations sound really bad, they were really just a white lie in this context because there was no chance they would be used against the boy. What could have happened is that the jury would have found reasonable doubt, or perhaps used that as an excuse for applying some sanity (in effect jury nullification).<br /><br />We need to give credit where credit is due. Putting any part of the blame for this horror on the woman is to excuse some of the antisex bigotry and the laws. Instead we need to realize how hateful the system really is. Hate the legislators and enforcers, not the girl.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-52605105354572459552020-03-08T04:27:53.601+01:002020-03-08T04:27:53.601+01:00@Eivind : Her accusing the boy of rape makes it ha...@Eivind : Her accusing the boy of rape makes it hard for me to feel sorry for her. What if the boy had been 16ish? He would have been in for a rape charge that could have ruined his life and she would have accused him all the same, only with more success before the court. According to you the girl was only defending herself. But wait, were not other defences possible instead of crying rape? If this was a victimless crime, as it most certainly is to the readers of this blog, why was she playing victim?. She could have alleged the boy taunted her or made her horny or he wanted it badly or looked older or looked like some sex would do him good etc. These would've been sex-positive defences. Instead she defaulted to the "man raped woman" feminist mantra like all women will. How predictable! If this girl can accuse a 13-year-old of raping her, imagine what she would accuse a grow man of. No sympathy from me this time.Jacknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-33961705663872380512020-03-07T11:53:26.898+01:002020-03-07T11:53:26.898+01:00No, the way I understand it is he was never on tri...No, the way I understand it is he was never on trial for rape. The "rape" was merely her testimony in her own defense, not an accusation made to get him punished. It could only go so far as getting her found not guilty by the jury, not hurt him at all. Theoretically the police could put him on trial next, but that would make the antisex prosecutors (who had formerly painted him a victim) look so ridiculous that the only shame they have left would have prevented it. They care nothing about hurting the innocent, but contradicting their own antisex bigotry is another matter.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-62634516905914486222020-03-07T00:55:09.174+01:002020-03-07T00:55:09.174+01:00It seems that women have even gotten the right of ...It seems that women have even gotten the right of veto with regard to which books may be published and which may not:<br /><br />https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/06/media/woody-allen-memoir-hachette-ronan-farrow/index.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-85751931414127832102020-03-06T21:58:53.528+01:002020-03-06T21:58:53.528+01:00Yeah, but that rape allegation was only a result o...Yeah, but that rape allegation was only a result of having to defend herself against the sick laws that pretend she is a sexual abuser. When the only legal options are to be a victim or abuser with nothing in between, we can't blame her for choosing the former. The problem is the perverse law which denies most of reality and replaces it with its dishonest categories, and the dimwits who even accept this framework without risking punishment but rather out of greed because they want to work in the abuse industry.<br /><br />It's just another way the evil perpetrated by the antisex bigots feeds on itself and creates more evil. We male sexualists need to be the grownup in the room who says stop, this madness needs to end, because no one else will. Attacking the character of the poor innocent woman is a complete red herring.<br /><br />The judge here takes the antisex bigotry to another absurd level by pretending that not only is the sex damaging to the boy, but having managed to impregnate her is as well:<br /><br />"It seems to me that one of the evils here is that, for the rest of his life, the victim will know that that baby girl is laying somewhere that he does not know about and that - I can say as a man - would be as scarring for a father as for a mother."<br /><br />Where do these absurd non sequiturs come from, and how did this idiot convince himself that the solution is to punish the mother rather than let the father have contact with his daughter? It is a religion of hate and nothing but hate, where the only remedy for their imaginary problems is to ramp up the antisex hate with more and more damage -- real damage for imaginary abuse while these sickos pretend they are the good guys. A scorched-earth policy against sexuality and everything associated with it; the feminists will leave no smidgin of humanity and love unburned.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-20570574957454301982020-03-06T21:25:16.060+01:002020-03-06T21:25:16.060+01:00US/UK is clearly experiencing record levels of sex...US/UK is clearly experiencing record levels of sexual repression to endorse this kind of hatred of sex.<br /><br />However, let's not shed a tear so quickly for the girl involved:<br />"She then falsely claimed he had raped her but a jury rejected the allegation"<br /><br />...and she wasn't a 'nice girl' like you claim, she was simply following her hypergamy and found a 13 year old male more dominant and popular than the other males in her life. Save the 'nice girl' talk for when females start fucking those they consider weak and pathetic out of sympathy (hint: that will never happen).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-20614361176668666862020-03-05T01:07:18.442+01:002020-03-05T01:07:18.442+01:00I took a 16 km walk to try to calm down, and recor...I took a 16 km walk to try to calm down, and recorded a little rant:<br /><br />My despair of the female sex offender charade<br /><br />https://youtu.be/qV5z64jQDvg<br /><br />Not listing this on my channel since it isn't fabulous, but had to get out something. I need therapy for the PTSD -- post-traumatic sexlaw disorder -- that the female sex offender charade gives me.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-27775693061748920932020-03-04T18:45:22.104+01:002020-03-04T18:45:22.104+01:00A candidate for the hottest ever female "sex ...A candidate for the hottest ever female "sex offender" and hence luckiest boy:<br /><br />https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8074219/Married-nursery-worker-20-sex-13-year-old-boy-baby-facing-jail.html<br /><br />The judge is sick in the head as usual and considering locking her up. Also this was when she was, 17, so only 4 years difference and the sicko still wants to pursue this! We live in a world so deranged I am shaking with hatred.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-52063085524785850932020-03-02T21:58:19.606+01:002020-03-02T21:58:19.606+01:00If you want to stare into the abyss of evil and in...If you want to stare into the abyss of evil and insanity that is the female sex offender charade, there are 50 of them here:<br /><br />https://twitter.com/undeadscribe/status/1234353028712497152<br /><br />On the other hand I finally found something else equally strange as the lie that lucky boys are "abused" by women: Meinong's jungle.<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meinong%27s_jungle<br /><br />It is the idea that even self-contradictory worlds are real.<br /><br /><i>Meinong, an Austrian philosopher active at the turn of the 20th century, believed that since non-existent things could apparently be referred to, they must have some sort of being, which he termed sosein ("being so"). A unicorn and a pegasus are both non-being; yet it's true that unicorns have horns and pegasi have wings. Thus non-existent things like unicorns, square circles, and golden mountains can have different properties, and must have a 'being such-and-such' even though they lack 'being' proper. The strangeness of such entities led to this ontological realm being referred to as "Meinong's jungle."</i><br /><br />So now we know where female sexual abusers reside. They are the very most bizarre creatures of Meinong's jungle.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-36677000230129214152020-03-02T15:35:03.001+01:002020-03-02T15:35:03.001+01:00I agree that film is courageous, but the intoleran...I agree that film is courageous, but the intolerance would be there without the religious right because feminism is an antisexual worldview in its own right now, and furthermore feminism has no history of being anything but an antisex ideology while Christianity at least used to tolerate marriage.<br /><br />But yeah, now we are in a time of plague and it will be interesting how that plays out. I guess there will just be less of everything including antisex persecutions and then that will return along with business as usual when the pandemic is over. So not really a reason for optimism even if the virus does manage to kill a lot of bigots, unless there will also be an economic collapse which shakes up the world order. With the Chinese now going back to work that doesn't seem likely, though.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-46428638524814391172020-03-02T07:32:00.611+01:002020-03-02T07:32:00.611+01:00Take a look at this article criticizing the castin...Take a look at this article criticizing the casting of a 10 year old girl as a sex robot in a courageous new film from Berlin:<br /><br />https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/walkouts-at-screening-of-new-movie-featuring-10-year-old-girl-playing-sex-robot<br /><br />All of these critics fail to realize marriages to 8 year olds were just fine for the majority of human existence - husbands would simply wait until girls got their periods before consummating the marriage. It’s amazing how modern Western societies have constructed a morality around making sure a female is a consumer for as long as possible before “marriage” (which isn’t really marriage anymore in any traditional sense of the word).<br /><br />Anyway, my point is, if you look at the comments, both male and female are religious right conservative feminists. These are the people who are our true enemies. They will never change, and they believe normal male sex drives are evil, so they pass laws that oppress the world.<br /><br />However, it seems like we won’t be thinking about sex for a while with this dumb virus going around. Maslow’s needs will dictate survival first.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-18055131999732110842020-02-29T19:19:27.892+01:002020-02-29T19:19:27.892+01:00The noblest quality of male sexualism is that we r...The noblest quality of male sexualism is that we refuse to be nonchalant about punishing people like the rest of society, at least not for sex crimes. Whenever I see someone wanting to apply the sex laws to women just because it is "equal," or to get even because men face so many injustices, I am shocked by such nonchalance.<br /><br />It is one thing to wish for a gender-equal utopia, quite another to treat people as if it already exists, and worst of all to dole out extreme punishments on that basis. This is what the female sex offender charade does: you want to punish women based on some hypotethical view of how they (and men) might be if society somehow were set up to produce equal sexual mentalities in men and women. Never mind that all experiments to that end have failed and it looks ridiculously unlikely that it can ever succeed by social construction.<br /><br />You argue for something with no evidence, and yet you refuse to acknowledge all the evidence against it. Homosexuality is indeed standard sexuality for the respective sexes except for the homo part; that is well documented. You don't need to look at the homosexuals either because surveys of straight preferences in the most feminist countries show the same pattern, even in the youngest generations after all the gender-equalist propaganda they have been brought up with. Men want many more partners no matter what society tells them and this inevitably leads to the commodification of female sexuality. It is absurd to conduct sexualist activism on the presumption that this difference shouldn't really exist.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-15938117835300360812020-02-29T08:55:40.192+01:002020-02-29T08:55:40.192+01:00Social sciences are not exact sciences.
In latter...Social sciences are not exact sciences. <br />In latter experiment can definitely prove or disprove some theory as it can be effectively cleared of any bias.<br />I would dare to say that in some cases there is present desired outcome that is afterwards rationalised. At least there is significant space for doing so.<br /><br />By term “traditional roles” I meant by it “only regarding recreative sex value”, I am not denying differences between males and females as whole, because there are proven differences by exact scientific methods. <br />I am only guessing, whether there would be strong reduction of capitalisation of female sexuality, in form as we know it today,<br />if we will severe ties with present civilisation and change some conditions that formed our customs.<br />I am not saying that male and female behaviour would be absolutely identical.<br />Anyway humans and other species are accommodating to conditions and circumstances they are living, in long term run.<br /><br />Only thing that could(partially) prove or disprove my theory would be to set an experiment in society which is absolutely isolated from sex-negative societies influence, yet it have available modern reproduction control. <br />Such society does not exist. Only societies maybe close to sex-positive (what I know) were Polynesian ones, but yet without modern healthcare. <br />Homosexuals and “equal” societies are not comparable example. <br />Homosexuality is not standard sexuality, so there could be many other causes for their behaviour. <br />When it come to “equal” or a feminist societies they cannot be taken as a example because they are neither equal nor sex-positive, despite they are pretending to be.<br />Sex-negativity(don’t give it to them so easily) is still taught to girls, although it is packed in some modern outfit, with psychobabble, instead of fornication-god hates you. <br />Traditional narrative with modern face.<br /><br />There must be absolutely severed ties to other cultures to have conclusive outcomes.<br /><br />Regarding your link: There are many other ways how to understand those outcomes. <br />Yes we can see Scandinavia on one side and Islamic world on other, but there can be and probably are many other factors affecting it. <br /><br />I have no education to study and correctly interpret various researches to argue with you over it. <br />Even if I would have it, I wouldn’t waste energy on it as I see commenting on this blog rather as relieve, rather than to influence some (probably very tiny minority) of people.<br /><br />What I know for sure is that your activity regarding female sexual power and NOFAP as a <br />pro-male activist…..is like I would have defence barrister, who will bring to court evidence against me-because he want to be truth seeking and ethical.<br />It is not to say that I adore activists who puts out blatant lies as the end justifies means for them, <br />but there should be some reasonable balance between:<br />“DOES NOT COMPUTE, ILLOGICAL” and “DO EVERYTHING THAT WILL HELP US”<br /><br />BTW: Various of these traditionalists are pretending to be friends of male, fighting against evils of feminism, but in fact their doctrines are only nurturing white-knightism, same as yours.Milan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-65024678601407463022020-02-28T15:48:05.080+01:002020-02-28T15:48:05.080+01:00Here's an analogy to support my distinction be...Here's an analogy to support my distinction between sexual abuse (that women can't commit) and sexualized abuse (that they can). A crime can be motivated by racism or "racialized" without deserving an extra exacerbating category of hate crime -- unless you believe that sort of categorization is sensible because some groups are more valuable than others. The crimes of sexual abuse, and the harsher penalties that go along with them, are a sort of "hate crime" on top of generic violence and abuse. In the case of male perpetrators, this arguably makes sense because sexuality is really that significant and worthy of special protection. But female perpetrators don't have that capacity! What you are left with, then, is an entirely baseless and arbitrary "hate crime" amounting to misogyny just like the hate laws easily amount to racism themselves. The conceptualization of "sexual abuse" or "sexual assault" or "exploitation" is a meaningless, superfluous and hateful maltreatment of women when applied to them, which reasonable men need to oppose.<br /><br />Remember that "sexual abuse" is a formal category with severe consequences, while "sexualized abuse" is just a description. You can even use the word "sexual abuse" for all I care if you don't mean to imply that the same laws should apply to women, but since that's invariably what is meant in these sorts of arguments, I need to very firmly state that women can't commit sexual abuse.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-4155642203375668632020-02-28T14:19:56.675+01:002020-02-28T14:19:56.675+01:00Are you familiar with the finding that gender equa...Are you familiar with the finding that gender equality leads to greater sex differences? I first heard this from Jordan Peterson, but it is really well established now. See for example:<br /><br />https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/02/does-gender-equality-result-in-fewer-female-stem-grads<br /><br />And it makes sense that freedom to express your natural tendencies leads to more sex differences if the sexes really are different. I think this would happen on your hypothetical island as well. And we actually don’t need to set up such an experiment because we already have one: gays and lesbians are sort of islands within society with minimal influence from the opposite sex. And they don’t display the same behavior at all. Lesbian sexuality is extremely lackluster by male standards and male homosexuality shows how promiscuous men really want to be. The girls on your island would be like lesbians except the boys would influence them into a sort of compromise, which also happens in our heterosexual society. They would still price their sexuality as highly as our women do, with plenty more demand for it than they want to meet, and if anything, social norms would tend to pull women into more sex with more partners than they really want. Despite all our sex abuse hysteria, this is still how it works here too. The feminist myth of the slut is larger than life, which is one reason they need all the hair-trigger rape laws to make it “safe” for women again.<br /><br />There comes a point when the social constructionist theory of sex differences is crushed by so much evidence that it just becomes ridiculous. Do you really not think we are there yet? How much more evidence do you need? Don't you think we already have done enough experiments? It’s not like Muslims and pork at all. That taboo wouldn’t spontaneously arise, but you can be sure the usual sex roles would, at least in terms of how they feel about promiscuity and rape. Another example is the arranged marriages in some traditional societies versus the hypergamous serial monogamy in feminist countries. Traditional society makes women more sexually willing than they really want to be, and when nothing constrains them they go back to chasing alphas and capitalizing more on their sexuality because they can.<br /><br />Once again, applying rape and sexual abuse laws to women is nonsense for the same deep reasons. You are flatly wrong by your assertion that the 8-year-old you could have been “sexually abused” by a woman. Sure you could have been genuinely abused in a sexualized way, but that is different: there can be no reasonably acknowledgeable AGGRAVATION by the sexual aspect itself!Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.com