tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post4159543602610995751..comments2024-03-28T10:43:26.059+01:00Comments on Eivind Berge's Blog: The persecution of Jessica MihalovitsEivind Bergehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comBlogger199125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-43468683019701057452021-06-02T18:44:09.655+02:002021-06-02T18:44:09.655+02:00Sorry, I don't get what you mean by "ther...Sorry, I don't get what you mean by "there's a Jesuit on both sides of every conflict."Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-72423779446622126692021-06-02T17:57:36.089+02:002021-06-02T17:57:36.089+02:00This happens under the first Jesuit pope. Remembe...This happens under the first Jesuit pope. Remember there's a Jesuit on both sides of every conflict, which could be a hint as to why conservative states are adopting feminist looking rules.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-41482097604210176082021-06-02T17:55:47.057+02:002021-06-02T17:55:47.057+02:00The real danger of Catholic law is not that the ch...The real danger of Catholic law is not that the church itself has any punishment systems like the inquisition of olden times, but that Catholics are in political office and other authority positions and they'll make policy based on Catholic law. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-9614397475794250302021-06-02T07:08:53.700+02:002021-06-02T07:08:53.700+02:00It is no coincidence that the steady decrease of &...It is no coincidence that the steady decrease of "in person child sexual abuse" (aka banging hot young teens) is exactly what the jealous old hags and their jealous men want, and they are achieving it through widespread cultural change. Porn is ubiquitous, and by constantly handing out draconian sentences for pictures of under 18 naked girls, they change the cultural attitudes in real life as well. Devious.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-71930103915468057252021-06-02T03:20:07.718+02:002021-06-02T03:20:07.718+02:00"The story of the great witch hunts of the 16..."<i>The story of the great witch hunts of the 16th and 17th centuries remains a mystery in many respects. What caused this folly to take hold of the minds of the Europeans? And what caused that folly to abate? It turns out that evil has a natural cycle of growth and decline. It is possible to accelerate the decline of a killer meme if good people get together in rejecting it.</i>"<br /><br />An inspirational quote from Ugo Bardi. The good people are now us, the male sexualists. Well worth reading:<br /><br />https://thesenecaeffect.blogspot.com/2021/05/memes-that-kill-cycle-of-witch-burning.html<br /><br /><i>As exterminations go, the war on witches was not the worst on record. In Europe, it caused about 50 thousand victims over a little more than a century. But it was so shockingly cruel in targeting mostly helpless women that it is remembered to this day as a form of collective madness. With us, the expression "witch hunt" is even proverbial.</i><br /><br />Then they targeted helpless women and now with the female sex offender charade they target women who are not only helpless but also the sexually nicest and most generous.<br /><br />Let us come together and accelerate the decline of the killer meme that women can be sexual abusers. Indeed this is what I have been doing for twenty years no, but let us continue. If the reason for hunting witches now as then is stress release, however, it is not looking good during times of collapse.<br /><br /><i>The extermination of the European witches generated plenty of studies in modern times, mostly concentrated on the causes of the phenomenon. Explanations are many but, in general, it is agreed that it was related to the stress generated by the Reformation and the associated wars. <b>Apparently, torturing and killing women was a form of stress release</b>. The human mind must have plenty of serious problems, evidently, but this much we know not just because of witch hunting.</i>Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-4632105197061179642021-06-01T18:35:31.958+02:002021-06-01T18:35:31.958+02:00Yes, that is definitely a big part of it. If they ...Yes, that is definitely a big part of it. If they admitted that child sexual abuse is actually declining, in part because men are so busy masturbating to all the easily available porn on the Internet, it would be hard to justify ever more laws and funding for the abuse industry. So they needed to invent a new category of abuse and pretend it's real. But at the end of the day, is it possible to debate ideas on their merit? I realize that none of the professional feminists will go against their employer, but it is bizarre how unquestioned the dogma is that all this wanking and "grooming" that leads to nothing more counts as real abuse. The conformity is just staggering and it feels so empty and meaningless when no intellectual honesty can be found anywhere on the subject except these occasional scholarly publications that make no difference to the politics.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-71806604833087289282021-06-01T18:05:38.811+02:002021-06-01T18:05:38.811+02:00This may explain why they went on to criminalize n...This may explain why they went on to criminalize non-in-person child sexual abuse: to keep statistics on abuse high and thus find a pretext for further criminalization...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-56508462122918843892021-06-01T17:46:45.516+02:002021-06-01T17:46:45.516+02:00So there are two possibilities. Either the feminis...So there are two possibilities. Either the feminists are delusional like the wankers who think they are getting sexual value from porn, or they are more against the idea of sex and sexual fantasies than sex itself. I am open to debate on which one of these carry more weight, and if it is the latter, that means means our activism needs to be somewhat modified like I am already doing with nofap and my refusal to include porn laws in our concept of antisexual persecution per se. It means the feminists are less ideological enemies than we thought, if they are able to comprehend that they aren't actually battling sex by all the anti-porn persecution and still think it worthwhile.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-23395967745632360262021-06-01T17:28:20.317+02:002021-06-01T17:28:20.317+02:00Just see what I mean, because here are the facts a...Just see what I mean, because here are the facts already staring them in the face from the scientific literature:<br /><br />https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27325170/<br /><br />"<i>The current review found little to no evidence that availability of the Internet has increased the worldwide incidence or prevalence of in-person child sexual abuse. In fact, <b>during the time period in which the Internet has flourished, international crime statistics have shown a steady decrease of in-person child sexual abuse</b>.</i>"<br /><br />And the bigots <i>don't care</i>, and never will even though their persecution of pornography has the diametrically opposite effect of what it's advertised to be, because it is the <i>idea</i> of the sexual minor that they are fighting and in that worldview, porn and wanking are indeed equal if not worse crimes than contact offenses. It is bonkers, but that's literally how they are, the official dogma that our culture and certainly the justice system runs on.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-80413311633451871932021-06-01T17:07:56.233+02:002021-06-01T17:07:56.233+02:00They will always find a way to pretend the minor i...They will always find a way to pretend the minor is "compelled" or exploited now matter who freely the pornography is made. It is by definition CSEM -- child sexual exploitation material, or in Norwegian "overgrepsmateriale," a self-reinforcing taboo whose name creates its own assumption, or if all else fails the same words are used to enforce the blasphemy of the mere concept that a minor can engage in anything sexual by their own accord. The feminists will gladly throw the baby out with the bathwater too as all the prosecutions of the minors themselves show. Ultimately it even works like honor killings and they still won't see anything wrong with it whatsoever. With the <i>crimen exceptum</i>, there can be no such thing as a cure worse than the disease because sexuality is seen as a fate worse than death, just like they burnt witches to save souls. So sorry, there is no swan song in sight for this bigotry and when it ultimately ends it won't be because the facts stared them in the face, which has no effect on such madness.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-8397626484723649792021-06-01T16:39:35.755+02:002021-06-01T16:39:35.755+02:00Since more and more pornography is made by the min...Since more and more pornography is made by the minors themselves without being "compelled", and this phenomenon will grow even more as of the result of the fact that minors get more and more access to digital media, one can easily foresee that this neverending criminalization is going to be the feminists' and bigots' swan song.<br />By the way, do they have prisons at all, in the Vatican City?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-92019365776037168322021-06-01T16:32:24.487+02:002021-06-01T16:32:24.487+02:00The feminists and normies believe porn is wrong be...The feminists and normies believe porn is wrong because it exploits minors and women; male sexualists believe porn is wrong because it DOESN'T provide sexual value and in fact detracts from our ability to pursue, perform at and enjoy sex. It always boggles my mind how the feminists and now also the religious zealots can't see that they are shooting themselves in the foot when they criminalize porn.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-58514836970459426072021-06-01T16:21:03.338+02:002021-06-01T16:21:03.338+02:00So all the Christian sex-hostility plus celibacy f...So all the Christian sex-hostility plus celibacy for priests wasn't enough -- gotta have feminist "abuse" theory on top of that!<br /><br />"<i>The Vatican has long considered any sexual relations between a priest and an adult as sinful but consensual, believing that adults are able to offer or refuse consent purely by the nature of their age. But amid the #MeToo movement and scandals of seminarians and nuns being sexually abused by their superiors, the Vatican has come to realize that adults can be victimized too if there is a power imbalance in the relationship.</i>"<br /><br />What a perfect match of hateful intolerant dogmas, guaranteeing that neither conservatives nor liberals will have any objections. <br /><br />But I gotta laugh at their belief in the wanker's delusion and the feminist flipside of it which holds that minors can be sexually exploited remotely:<br /><br />"<i>The Vatican also criminalized the “grooming” of minors or vulnerable adults by priests to compel them to engage in pornography. It’s the first time church law has officially recognized as criminal the method used by sexual predators to build relationships with their victims to then sexually exploit them.</i>"<br /><br />I also condemn pornography and wanking, but for diametrically opposite reasons that are lost on these buffoons, lol!Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-39887570759389615962021-06-01T16:07:21.419+02:002021-06-01T16:07:21.419+02:00More criminalization - this time in Jesus' nam...More criminalization - this time in Jesus' name:<br /><br />https://www.mail.com/int/news/world/10833066-vatican-law-criminalizes-abuse-adults-priests-lait.html#.1258-stage-hero1-7<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-36974894590697507852021-06-01T07:10:28.253+02:002021-06-01T07:10:28.253+02:00boris has access to infinite cash because he is th...boris has access to infinite cash because he is the employee of the people who print the cash.<br /><br />but this story shows a situation that is even worse, which is that a large amount of british men have no money from the divorce/child support system destroying them. the media ran this article to "humanize" boris and endear him to the population.<br /><br />also, texas is very "conservative" and "right wing", notice their feminism on full display passing a law that even the most left wing places in the USA have not done.<br /><br />and jack, I am not going to do the research for you. the fake poison vaccine is killing people at insane rates, they put the people who die from the fake poison vaccine into the coronavirus death category to cover up the death toll. even just using the VAERS system, which reports 1% of all adverse reactions at best, the fake poison coronavirus vaccine is more deadly than all past vaccines combined. this, for a disease that has a 99.9% survival rate, even when using their own highly inflated and fake death rate statistics. you have to be completely insane and stupid to put their poison into your body.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-68838798972727376912021-05-29T15:18:10.609+02:002021-05-29T15:18:10.609+02:00It says he has an "indeterminate number of ch...It says he has an "indeterminate number of children," lol! So he is doing it right, living the male sexualist dream exactly how I preach with no birth control and younger women, and you didn't expect that to be free, did you?Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-44580544105890221522021-05-29T14:54:11.132+02:002021-05-29T14:54:11.132+02:00Meanwhile the men who don't fall prey to sexua...Meanwhile the men who don't fall prey to sexual laws get ruined by family law:<br /><br />https://news.yahoo.com/boris-johnson-told-friends-broke-113500987.html<br /><br />The trad MRAs may be wrong when it comes to sexual abuse and AOC but their other grievances still hold.Jacknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-1590684408914526422021-05-28T11:44:07.166+02:002021-05-28T11:44:07.166+02:00Stripping is exploitative of the male sex drive si...Stripping is exploitative of the male sex drive since there is no sex, but not abusive and pathological like porn. You don't walk out of a strip club less able to have sex like you do after wanking. On the contrary, stripping works the way delusional people think porn stokes your sex drive, and sometimes strippers can also offer sex outside of the venues. To be clear, raising the minimum age of strippers to 21 is bad news, not least because it is part of the slippery slope of also raising the age of consent or criminalizing age gaps.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-41993950563522312442021-05-28T11:29:43.504+02:002021-05-28T11:29:43.504+02:00"Fantastic news for Male Sexualists Eivind! O..."Fantastic news for Male Sexualists Eivind! Our anti-Porn activist femiservative allies have succeeded in raising the minimum age for strippers in Texas from 18 to 21."<br /><br />There are two different issues here that must not be conflated. While I think it is wasteful for men to visit strip clubs or patronize any kind of "sex workers" who don't actually have sex with you, stripping is NOT pornography! Porn is what facilitates masturbation, and I don't think men masturbate in strip clubs. Masturbation is not just a waste of time, but actively detrimental to your sexuality, which is why you have understood nothing and are still in stupendous denial of your self-abuse if you think this new law in Texas should be any level of good news for male sexualists. It is not exactly good news to ban porn either because the punishment is undeserved, but men should stay away from porn for their own good -- or more to the point, not masturbate. Just watching strippers is not something I warn against or politicize at all.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-2057797794848132412021-05-28T11:15:43.329+02:002021-05-28T11:15:43.329+02:00"@Eivind - do you believe a term like 'ga..."@Eivind - do you believe a term like 'gay sex toy' is an oxymoron?"<br /><br />I can't even parse that concept, so it must be. Don't know what it would refer to or why you ask the question.<br />Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-2624627025131530712021-05-28T09:32:05.326+02:002021-05-28T09:32:05.326+02:00https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/the-rolling-stones-ly...https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/the-rolling-stones-lyrics-stray-cat-blues-underage-groupies/Dom Krauernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-11293697190321918882021-05-28T09:29:45.153+02:002021-05-28T09:29:45.153+02:00@Eivind - do you believe a term like 'gay sex ...@Eivind - do you believe a term like 'gay sex toy' is an oxymoron?<br /><br />@Jack - you believe that males (or certain males for example in the legal system, politicians etc support feminist anti-sex hysteria laws as a form of cockblocking other men through locking them up? <br /><br />It could explain partly why 1 in 5 young black men are imprisoned in the USA. Maybe it's a case of white men cockblocking young male bucks. But I remember that the idea that white women find young black men sexually attractive wasn't a popular idea in the Manosphere. And why are prisons clearing out the soft drug offenders (largely young males) and making room for more and more older male sex offenders? White men are cockblocking old white men for looking at illegal porn or for what they did in the 1970's?<br /><br />Of course, we know that males are disposable, and that the average man is worth nothing to any other man or woman or society at large. This is why even our leader of the 'MALE Sexualist' movement Eivind focuses most of his efforts on the tiny 0.1% of sex offenders who are female as the greatest injustice and tragedy.<br /><br />Dom Krauernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-44273591777315453572021-05-28T05:58:14.587+02:002021-05-28T05:58:14.587+02:00Quote: "The poison fake "vaccines" ...Quote: "The poison fake "vaccines" may not save us from feminism, but they will without a doubt create a window to change viewpoints due to the fact that those who do not take the poison will be more attractive both in physicality and intelligence, and thus less jealous about sex." Unquote.<br /><br />This is typical of why men will never be out of the woods. As I explained before, rather than confront the gynocracy, men will gang up against all sorts of male dangers and male enemies. Anything but to accept women as THE enemy. Here the red herring is "vaccines" or the pharmaceutical men. What you should write is "the poison fake vaccines may not save us from feminism but they will provide us with yet another wished-for digression".<br /><br />Tell me, when will your "poison vaccines" take effect? Because it's now about half a year since people have been vaccinated en masse, and the only consequence for the vaccinated are beside vanishingly rare blood clots and whatnot, a near-zero incidence of clinical Covid. Why don't you publish an electronic book or at least a blog article about this so that we can look back 5 years from now and see if you were a genius or a fool?<br /><br />That Mike Yeadon fellow did an about-turn on vaccines. So what? Former coworkers of his say they don't recognise him as the the Mike Yeadon they knew. Roosh V did an about-turn on picking-up girls remember? Did he get blackmailed or did he lose his mind? Montagnier most certainly has had Alzheimer. Jacknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-49503775920587296762021-05-28T05:56:53.341+02:002021-05-28T05:56:53.341+02:00I don't know what to tell you. You've been...I don't know what to tell you. You've been sufficiently warned. Go risk your entire future and the entire future of your political ideals for literally no reason at the critical moment of truth, again for literally no reason.<br /><br />You're acting worse than the idiots who never read anything and walk right into the trap because they are told to do so.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-17604761621307402732021-05-27T21:12:10.902+02:002021-05-27T21:12:10.902+02:00I've registered for it, but still have the opt...I've registered for it, but still have the option to refuse vaccination since they haven't called my turn yet. However, are the claims of harm any more credible than, say, the idea that vaccines cause autism? Many of the same people are now attacking the covid vaccines for what seems to be equally baseless reasons. I know there are also some like Mike Yeadon who have far better insight than the usual antivaxxers and also claim something very sinister is going on with the current vaccines, but still, everybody in the medical groups that I read have eagerly gotten vaccinated. When nobody who is informed about medical research and whose judgment I respected since long before covid finds reason to believe the vaccine is poison, why should I think so? There will always be conspiracy theorists and plain crazies who come up with such paranoia no matter how good a vaccine is.<br /><br />For a while they said the vaccine can cause prion disease, and there were reports of people driving erratically and imminent zombie apocalypse, but now it has been weeks since I've heard anything of the sort. Yes, infertility was a legitimate concern, but I think only in women and that too must have boiled down to almost nothing or we would be hearing much more about it right now. Blood clots in especially women and endocarditis in men are real side effects, but rare enough to be acceptable because covid is much more likely to kill you in those ways too and if you don't get vaccinated, you will likely sooner or later get covid now that it is endemic. I haven't 100% made up my mind and I am closely watching how the situation develops, but for now it looks like I most likely will get vaccinated.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.com