tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post5191703535208734784..comments2024-03-15T15:56:38.460+01:00Comments on Eivind Berge's Blog: More on the female sex offender charadeEivind Bergehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comBlogger89125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-35234879948951146072017-10-27T02:15:12.309+02:002017-10-27T02:15:12.309+02:00I think this will conclude every possible discours...I think this will conclude every possible discourse over Saudi Arabia.<br /><br />https://www.rt.com/news/407825-saudi-robot-citizen-sophia/<br /><br />This is wrong, sick and disturbing. <br />Mohammed bin Salman is a real perverted, wronged in brain and Dangerous (due to his power) individual.<br />This is the full project:<br /><br />https://www.rt.com/news/407677-saudi-high-tech-500-billion-mega-city/<br /><br />In 1 word: TAKFIR. Saudis elected themselves as protectors of the doctrine to justify their persecution against the Shias, but it was a real bullshit: it was about the control of the area. <br />Saudi governors are the real perverted, rotten apostates.<br /><br />Allah Hafiz, may IRAN save us all.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-6672760832644478532017-10-24T18:07:31.762+02:002017-10-24T18:07:31.762+02:00An update.
I wrote about the big change I was feel...An update.<br />I wrote about the big change I was feeling the smell about Saudi Arabia.<br />Well, it's happening.<br />The prince Mohammed bin Salman, the guy who removed the holy women's ban to drive cars (huge parties in new york happened after that), said that they will promote a "moderate" (aka feminist and western friendly version of) Islam. In short the manipulated islam to meet the western disvalues' requirements.<br /><br />And it will happen just like I wrote: since Saudi Arabia is a tyranny, it's easy to make up coups against men, and the huge backlash that will surely happen, will be classified as "terrorism", in oder to justify the most violent Crackdown possible.<br /><br />Those are the guys turining Yemen (country in which marriageable age for females is the start of puberty) into a parking lot.<br /><br />"We will not spend the next 30 years of our lives dealing with destructive ideas. We will destroy them today," he said.<br /><br />https://www.thenational.ae/world/gcc/saudi-s-mohammed-bin-salman-promises-return-to-moderate-open-islam-1.669974<br /><br />The last line of defense of Men's rights is gonna be devasted by the corrupetd and coward saudi tyrants.<br /><br /><br /><br />Allah hafiz...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-68575012245531863952017-09-11T15:28:49.579+02:002017-09-11T15:28:49.579+02:00Even if the idea of criminal "equality" ...Even if the idea of criminal "equality" had some merit as a tactic (which I still don't agree with), you are neglecting the emotional cost. The Men's Rights Movement is unlikely to make much of a difference at all, to be honest. One of the things we <i>can</i> do, however, is to at least express some truth and honesty which is banished from all other sides. I am not interested in being part of a movement which is indistinguishable from the mindless repetition of irrational sexual taboos that feminism consists of.<br /><br />I also prefer to take the ethical high ground and not sacrifice innocent people as a means to a tactical end. If governments decided to only prosecute men for drug crimes, then yes, that would be slightly less bad than the current Drug War from a selfless ethical perspective. The Swedish model of dealing with prostitution is also slightly less bad than the American model for the same reason. And again, I would hope that these injustices incite hatred in the hearts of men against our governments rather than against women, leading to eventual retaliation. Fighting for <i>expanded</i> criminalization is a harebrained, counterproductive way to retaliate against laws that are unjust to begin with.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-45162910027399538742017-09-11T14:55:34.818+02:002017-09-11T14:55:34.818+02:00Take drug crime. You probably agree that in 99% of...Take drug crime. You probably agree that in 99% of the cases drug crime is victimless crime. Now suppose governments decided to go a step further than the already existing gender-bias and exonerated women entirely from prosecution for drug crime. Such a scenario is not at all impossible as women are increasingly considered unaccountable for criminal behaviour. Would you say this is good because from then on a country would only jail 5000 men for drug crimes instead of jailing 5000 men + 1000 women like it did the year before? I'd say not. I'd say it would be very bad news.<br /><br />As another example take prostitution. There are basically two systems of prostitution interdiction in the West. 1) The US system where both the prostitute and the john can get prosecuted. 2) The "Nordic" system ("Swedish system") where only the man is at risk. Now tell me which is worse? I'd say the latter, much as it breaks my heart to see a beautiful prostitute treated like a gangster by US justice for providing sex to men.<br /><br />We need women on the tumbrel bearing prisoners to the guillotine for the guillotine to stop.<br />Jacknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-78059372376711020272017-09-10T11:22:20.049+02:002017-09-10T11:22:20.049+02:00I know men were also victims of witch-hunts, but m...I know men were also victims of witch-hunts, but my point is that women definitely were too, and it didn't prevent this kind of persecution from lasting for hundreds of years. So even if the tactic of holding women equally responsible for bullshit crimes ultimately can be successful, I do not think it is worth the price.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-37394563345595053682017-09-10T11:02:42.692+02:002017-09-10T11:02:42.692+02:00You shouldn't bring up the witch hunts because...You shouldn't bring up the witch hunts because the witch-hunt myth is another one that needs debunking. In fact men were ten times as likely to be exectued for heresy or witchcraft as women. Even the so-called "salem witches" had a number of men among them, which History books completely ignore. Most witch cases follow a regular pattern: some women get hysterical and inquisitors get involved. The women "confess" having been bewitched by certain men and the latter burn at the stake. <br /><br />The women who initiated the hunt usually got off with their lives. Very similar to false rape accusations when you come to think of it.Jacknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-208072867912885592017-09-10T10:41:53.230+02:002017-09-10T10:41:53.230+02:00The biggest reason for me personally why I can'...The biggest reason for me personally why I can't bring myself to say that women can rape boys would be the intellectual dishonesty of it. However, I also question your premise that society is unwilling to hurt women in just as horrible ways as men. Because didn't that happen during the witch-hunts? Women were not just hanged, but burned at the stake for just as meaningless reasons as the justification given for locking up sex offenders. So I honestly don't think it is a good tactic to call for persecution of both sexes.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-39895699196724613462017-09-10T08:44:51.100+02:002017-09-10T08:44:51.100+02:00Your thought experiment with the conscripting wome...Your thought experiment with the conscripting women into the Vietnam war is not so far-fetched as you think. I'm convinced Societies are run by women and for women although men stand in the forefront doing the dirty work. As soon as women get hurt and killed, Society sits up and takes notice. The reason we haven't had any nuclear war is because atom bombs kill women as well as men. Killing women in war is war crime, killing men in war is spot on.<br /><br />Reverting to sex, your mantra is that women cannot possibly rape men. While this makes sense, it is not helping men at all, at least as long as the scales of justice remain so atrociously tilted against men. If things continue as they are going, men will get hanged for having sex with consenting 15-17 year-old girls. One way to prevent this is to see that women who act similarly with boys also get the same sentence. Society will shrink from hanging people only if women are among those to be hanged.<br /><br />The right mantra is not "women cannot rape men", but "no one can rape a consenting adult or nubile teenager". If I'm not mistaken it is a mantra you would not be averse to. Alas, it is also one for which our Time has zero tolerance.<br /><br />Women going to jail for making young guys happy requires a overdose of hypocrisy. With time, in a best case scenario, the hypocrisy bubble will burst and the case of the men going to jail for the same crime will come up for discussion.<br /><br />Incidentally, Turd Fling Monkey (TFM), an otherwise sensible MGTOW, has uploaded a vid on his Youtube channel that would infuriate you. It is entitled "Gynocentric grooming gangs". It includes some sickening lament about underage prison inmates who were "abused" by a female prison guard.Jacknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-30131003197063852352017-09-08T11:20:27.795+02:002017-09-08T11:20:27.795+02:00I can't fathom why you would even think of fig...I can't fathom why you would even think of fighting injustice with more of the same. This is something only our generation can come up with, probably because feminists have been so successful at instilling the charade of gender equality. Without this brainwashing, I submit that it would not even occur to MGTOWs and pseudo-MRAs to use this tactic. Imagine if, during the Vietnam War era, those who opposed that war didn't call for it to end, but instead claimed they wanted to start another pointless war for which women would be conscripted until you had an equal number of dead women. Would that make sense? There is zero evidence that it works, and more importantly it is not right to create more innocent victims just to make a point.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-79682301914772053892017-09-08T11:05:46.166+02:002017-09-08T11:05:46.166+02:00How is that tactical support of injustice working ...How is that tactical support of injustice working out for you? Last time I checked, feminists were only enthusiastic about the same laws being applied to women. They seem to be perfectly content with equal injustice for all as long as they can have their sex-hostile laws.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-56374714815145195172017-09-08T10:51:59.253+02:002017-09-08T10:51:59.253+02:00Eivind, you are absolutely right about those young...Eivind, you are absolutely right about those young guys getting lucky and it being madness to jail the women who did it. But we live in a world of gender-bias madness and from a tactical point of view many genuine MRAs and MGTOWs (like myself) still consider it is a good thing for women to be victims of that madness from time to time. In other words if you jail a man for being kind to an consenting underage girl, at least jail a woman for being kind to a likewise consenting underage guy. The point I'm making s a purely tactical one and it does not alter the fact that jailing a woman for being kind to a teenage guy is madness and indicative of a very sick Society.Jacknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-91705128198511036002017-08-09T01:08:18.245+02:002017-08-09T01:08:18.245+02:00Assange is (was) an Alpha, like a rockstar. He nev...Assange is (was) an Alpha, like a rockstar. He never had issues on getting quality pussy. He had no reason to be an MRA, actually he had part of your sexual quote... (that's being Alpha).<br /><br />They used feminism when he became a problem for the establishment's plans.<br /><br />It's the same pattern, Always. Remember DSK in France? He kept the financial dogs during the grecian crisis. A guy like him would have fucked up france against the power, if elected. The solution? Criminalizing and demonizing his sexuality.<br />It happened again when Assange, during the DNC gate, was alleged to have had a chat with a 15 years old girl a so-called "child".<br />Milo Yannoupolos? The same, and it was just about SPEECH, not even actions.<br /><br />The "poor victim" of Assange is a cunt who had relations with the DAMAS DE BLANCO, a subversive feminist Group intent on regime change in Cuba. She is not new on NATO secret services operations.<br /><br />Allah Hafiz.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-30720630736287184562017-08-08T23:29:37.308+02:002017-08-08T23:29:37.308+02:00Good to see that from Assange. He has not particul...Good to see that from Assange. He has not particularly distinguished himself as a men's rights activist, but perhaps the past seven years of feminist persecution has taught him something after all.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-5065792287911919672017-08-08T23:10:13.745+02:002017-08-08T23:10:13.745+02:00The west and its accolities are corrupted, rotten ...The west and its accolities are corrupted, rotten and sickening. Age of consent is only the nastier tip of the iceberg.<br />Here something interesting from Marthyr Julian Assange:<br /><br />https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/894998079019024385<br /><br />https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10624-012-9279-5<br /><br />Nothing new to me (and I totally agree on females' condition under the talibans and Islam) but it feels good to see that published into the Assange's twitter. Feminism has justified the worst war crimes and existential & natural rights violations perpetrated during the last 16 years.<br /><br />Another evidence that the Clinton Rodham CIA is behind the terrorism in Syria; a proxy to harass Ahmadinejad, the resistance of Hez Bollah and Russia (somehow it's not different to the feminist proxy war perpetrated by the subhumans in jail who rape men accused of the so called "sex crimes"):<br /><br />https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/892971876938637313<br /><br />https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/02/world/middleeast/cia-syria-rebel-arm-train-trump.html<br /><br />Meanwhile the terrorist CIA and Army establishment are keeping up to subvert:<br /><br />https://twitter.com/JulianAssange/status/893867868613464065<br /><br />Allah Hafiz, brothers.<br /><br />(Hello to all the Carrie Mathison reading this; you suck my balls)<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-3540892885831107852017-08-07T02:13:52.074+02:002017-08-07T02:13:52.074+02:00The author is crazy, I clicked on her timeline and...The author is crazy, I clicked on her timeline and there are articles about rainbow babies #LGTBIbabies ??? !!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-43759932488793228642017-08-07T00:15:22.100+02:002017-08-07T00:15:22.100+02:00So Transformers is child porn, ok. Let's lock ...So <i>Transformers</i> is child porn, ok. Let's lock up everyone who has ever seen it or had anything to do with it, then. That is literally the intention of the child porn law.<br /><br />Wow, that reviewer has been well indoctrinated. The "ick factor" of a 17-year-old being called hot? What about the absurdity factor of making that statement? Have we reached the point where that doesn't even register?Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-44192561552898068622017-08-07T00:02:33.787+02:002017-08-07T00:02:33.787+02:00http://m.huffingtonpost.com/nikki-gloudeman/not-ok...http://m.huffingtonpost.com/nikki-gloudeman/not-ok-michael-bay-transf_b_5549427.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-51822806738189884382017-08-06T23:55:50.005+02:002017-08-06T23:55:50.005+02:00http://www.ravishly.com/2014/07/01/transformers-ag...http://www.ravishly.com/2014/07/01/transformers-age-extinction-review-sexismAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-83017693511272727422017-08-04T20:25:18.138+02:002017-08-04T20:25:18.138+02:00I don't think it is even possible to hypnotize...I don't think it is even possible to hypnotize a person against their will, so that just seems like a pure excuse for punishment where any "evidence" will do.<br /><br />I agree it is mostly a distinction without a difference. But it says something about the mentality of regime. Western governments have simply thrown all logic and rationality out the window and replaced it with make-belief, like passing a law making pi equal to 3.0.<br /><br />You are completely right that "child rapists" in Norway often get the same punishment as Breivik, which is what we call "forvaring" which means "preventative detention." This is a time-unlimited sentence which is euphemistically expressed in a minimum number of years, where his is 21 and theirs would typically be a few years shorter, but both can actually be locked up for life. It doesn't take much at all to get preventative detention for sex crimes in Norway; no contact needed, sometimes talking to women or minors online can be enough, but it also depends on how incorrigible the offender is deemed to be, which is a matter of pseudoscience and other motivations to lock him up for a very long time ("pedophiles" are prime targets, of course). It is infinitely worse to get five years of preventative detention than 21 years in prison (which is the maximum regular sentence), so these terms can easily confuse foreigners and make them think Norwegian justice is milder than it is. I think this deception is by design because liberals like to pretend that they believe in lenience, but they don't.<br /><br />I agree that "children" strictly only refers to prepubescents and will try to be more precise.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-23432937593208808742017-08-04T19:35:57.454+02:002017-08-04T19:35:57.454+02:00But they still oppress men and kill them.
Do you ...But they still oppress men and kill them. <br />Do you think the cops would have problems to get "evidences" about "hypnogenesis"?<br /><br />If there are other laws that criminalize sex with lighter penalties, as you pointed out; it's like they brought the western legislation and, to conceptually distinct and admit the personal will, they just increased to the extreme the penalty for pure rape, while keeping the western copycat legislation for the criminalization of other sexual occurrences.<br />To me, such a distinction is pretty pointless. <br />I bet that in Norway a "child rapist" gets the same penalty of Anders Brevik.<br />Tyrannies are Tyrannies, including those who try to fake out intellectual honesty.<br /><br />I don't like you using the term "children" to define people who are 14 years old; they are gronw adults. The legal age of majority has nothing to do with adulthood; historically the age of consent and marriageable age for women were settled a way before the age of majority.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-8246274348649345672017-08-04T17:19:19.624+02:002017-08-04T17:19:19.624+02:00I agree it is tyranny. But there are levels of tyr...I agree it is tyranny. But there are levels of tyranny, and the fact that the lawmakers feel they need to respect the will of children at least conceptually tells me that they haven't quite reached our level of tyranny yet. In Norway, as of the new penal code implemented in 2015, the law conceptually denies any will to a person under 14. Any sex with them is "rape," not statutory rape; the law explicitly lies and pretends they <i>don't have</i> a will. It is the difference between an outright lie and a weasel formulation that can be applied to anything in practice, but still respects the concept of children having human qualities such as the ability to decide if they want to do something or not. Norwegian legislators treat the people as idiots who are unaware of this self-evident reality, and they are getting away with it because Norwegians evidently are that dense, while Taiwanese legislators feel they still need to be intellectually honest. These conceptual distinctions may not matter in practice, but I find them philosophically significant.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-62100725986504962752017-08-04T15:29:40.813+02:002017-08-04T15:29:40.813+02:00"control, hypnogenesis or other ways"......"control, hypnogenesis or other ways"...<br />Are you sure, Eivind Berge? Do you think it could be hard to manipulate people to lie about their will?<br /><br />...hypnogenesis...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-45953566616112029212017-08-04T15:26:01.754+02:002017-08-04T15:26:01.754+02:00It's called Tyranny.
Any reaction is justified...It's called Tyranny.<br />Any reaction is justified, right and morally correct. <br />So called "rape" never justifies any penalty and death is a moral atrocity.<br />Hope the real victims will go all the way, like some are doing in India, to punish the society that allows this inhuman shit.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-44484944563774987432017-08-03T18:01:27.224+02:002017-08-03T18:01:27.224+02:00Because as far as I can tell, all of that applies ...Because as far as I can tell, all of that applies to things done against their will, rather than just statutorily defining them as victims. But there are probably other laws that do just that with a lesser penalty.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-49637070563219272332017-08-03T17:52:32.718+02:002017-08-03T17:52:32.718+02:00Why?Why?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com