tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post7387640141493330072..comments2024-03-28T10:43:26.059+01:00Comments on Eivind Berge's Blog: Support the Men's Movement by heating your roomEivind Bergehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comBlogger154125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-18541312106935182582018-08-15T02:41:04.709+02:002018-08-15T02:41:04.709+02:00In our simple life, love plays a very specific rol...In our simple life, love plays a very specific role. Now we are able to make your love life healthy and no space for any type of trouble. These all are possible with the help of Dr. EKPEN of SOLUTION TEMPLE. He helped me cast a spell that brought my long lost lover back within 48hours who left me for another woman. You can also contact him on EKPENTEMPLE@GMAIL.COM or add him on WHATSAPP +2347050270218 and be happy forever like am now with his experience.Barbarahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13154266365959573204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-78355469741845850792018-06-08T16:01:52.913+02:002018-06-08T16:01:52.913+02:00Erectile dysfunction was ruining not just my sex l...Erectile dysfunction was ruining not just my sex life but also my marriage. <br /><br />Divorce seemed inevitable. <br /><br />I was going to lose everything, even my kids... <br /><br />Until I discovered an amazing life hack that allows me to get my dick diamond hard, and ready for hot passionate sex with my wife on demand! <br /><br />This is not a joke. You CAN beat ED safely, and naturally without wasting money on dangerous pills for the rest of your life. <br />Watch the video below and learn how I did just that, and how YOU can too! <br /><br />===> <b><a href="http://www.mobilethemesworld.com/2018/05/23/exposed-how-to-increase-your-penis-size-naturally-without-surgery-pills-suction-devices-or-crazy-contraptions/" rel="nofollow">[Life Hack] One Amazing Trick to Get Hard on Demand</a></b> <=====<br /><br />The funny thing is, even though my marriage is saved, I almost wish I was single again with my newfound explosive sex drive and libido. <br />I hope my wife doesn't divorce me for wearing her out every night... ;) <br /><br />It's amazing that the secret to regaining your sexual vigor and killing ED permanently is all-natural, easy, and affordable. <br /><br />If you're wasting money on pumps, pills, injections, or disgusting food combinations, stop right now. <br /><br />The answer to your erectile dysfunction problems has been right in front of you this entire time... <br /><br />Use the link, watch the video. You won't believe how simple turbo-charging your penis, and beating ED really is. <br /><br />===> <b><a href="http://www.mobilethemesworld.com/2018/05/23/exposed-how-to-increase-your-penis-size-naturally-without-surgery-pills-suction-devices-or-crazy-contraptions/" rel="nofollow">The #1 Instant Erection Life Hack ? A Natural ED Killer </a></b> <=====<br /><br />P.S. Getting rid of ED isn't just about better sex, it's about regaining your pride and self-respect as a man. <br /><br />Watch the video and learn how easy it is to go from having a "wet noodle" to rocking a massive diamond hard erection your partner will want inside her every night! <br /><br />===> <b><a href="http://www.mobilethemesworld.com/2018/05/23/exposed-how-to-increase-your-penis-size-naturally-without-surgery-pills-suction-devices-or-crazy-contraptions/" rel="nofollow">Proof Of REAL Growth</a></b> <=====<br /><br /> <br /><br /><br />Adelehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05839957638126841440noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-35402203656224210712018-01-25T06:29:43.502+01:002018-01-25T06:29:43.502+01:00I appreciate your optimism, caamib, although I wou...I appreciate your optimism, caamib, although I would put the probabilities somewhat lower. I can also go so far as to say that I would welcome a Muslim revolution and convert by the time it happens, because my psychological reality is already that I am a quisling, albeit with no credible enemy of Norway to collaborate with any time soon, perhaps not in my lifetime. This is all hypothetical aside from my hatred of the authorities, and contingent on developments that other forces probably won't allow. Islamization of Europe is sadly much exaggerated and has already given rise to counterforces such as the alt-right.<br /><br />But yeah, we will both be too old to fight if the revolution is decades off, so this isn't really about us personally.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-66266777246683811302018-01-24T21:01:10.002+01:002018-01-24T21:01:10.002+01:00"Now, threats being credible or not are a mat...<br />"Now, threats being credible or not are a matter of separation: Anybody can, as Eivind rightfully points out, opine this or that on a blog and will most often not be considered to offer credible threats, but on a personal level for you caamib, you may still find yourself at the end of some degree of attention should you insist on using phrases that WOULD be talking yourself into trouble, AFK."<br /><br />And Norwegian law being what it is, recently cast a verdict that "Expression-responsibility is also under the law on social media" ( http://jonwesselaas.blogg.no/1515756550_ny_blogg.html )."<br /><br />This part of the post has no content. The first part of it is a claim you just make, a claim that goes against what I explained TWICE now. It doesn't even matter if it's on a blog or not. I know that I would say the same thing to a liberal in their face, but it would be no threat as I would also tell them who will kill them - a Muslim revolution, which will happen in some decades and I will almost certainly not be a part of. The probability part is something I covered before too. The second part is some bs on Norweigan law that says something about expression responsibility but isn't an argument for or against what I am trying to tell you. <br /><br />"Therefore, and pardon this rather longish rambling, you may wish to soften your language a little bit, and try to avoid speaking in certainties when you can in fact not be so certain."<br />Or, so I would recommend."<br /><br />Read what I told you in this post. Of course I can't know if all liberals will die and how must will certainly die. I don't know when but I can tell you it will be when Muslims finally take over most of Europe, as they should.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-35194203769368029232018-01-24T20:58:42.900+01:002018-01-24T20:58:42.900+01:00"Bare with me, as I try to lay out the logic ..."Bare with me, as I try to lay out the logic here as I believe a prosecutor might have done it."<br /><br />What the fuck is this? Are you trying to say you know what some "prosecutor" would do? Have you lost your damn mind? The fuck do you know what some prosecutor would do (hint - not all them would do the same)?<br /><br />"You are using the word "WILL". As opposed to the word "MAY".<br />That choice of words is way strong, it means *inevitable* rather than *possible* (or *plausible, or *probable*), which means it carries the connotation that you either KNOW that what you claim "WILL" happen is INEVITABLE, and given that nobody can see the future that further means that you have special knowledge from groups that are capable of doing so and are intent on doing so, either through your own involvement or through different channels that are trustworthy beyond doubt to you personally."<br /><br />No, I don't agree with this and I will tell you why. <br /><br />First of all, what needs to be made clear is that I thought you're an anti-pedophile liberal but it now appears you are not and that you're actually a MAP. In any case, my post was directed to somebody I thought was that kind of liberal. So I will explain why I said people like those will die. <br /><br />And, yes, you are right that technically the right word would be "may" but technically so would you say to somebody you will try to kill as you don't know how it will end. <br /><br />Regarding what I said, I am very certain that modern Western societies will collapse (their cultures have already collapsed around 2000) and then people like those liberals will certainly die. You don't have to be involved in this to know at all. All it takes is knowing some history and some facts about today's world. Let me give you an example - If some scientist who participated in the A-bomb program said, say around in July 1945, that most Japanese in the cities where the bomb will be thrown will die in something like a private conversation is he threatening the Japanese? No, he is just aware of the bomb's destructive power, just like I am aware of what awaits liberals. I don't need to be a part of this to know that they will be hardly any left alive. Now, yes, some MIGHT survive but most in fact surely WILL die. <br /><br />"Either way, it's like this: Were I to say to a police officer for example, that "You WILL be killed", then that is in no way ambiguous or open to interpretation in my favour, should I be accused of uttering a direct threat."<br /><br />What if that officer is going into some dangerous undercover mission and you know he will be discovered and killed? This is what I know about liberals - that they have created a world in which an uprising will delete them sooner or later. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-71113736637167166342018-01-16T10:47:01.963+01:002018-01-16T10:47:01.963+01:00I agree with a lot of things the Daily Antifeminis...I agree with a lot of things the Daily Antifeminist says and am inclined to go along with his rape apologia for tactical reasons. My reluctance to proclaiming that "rape should be legal" is not due to thinking we necessarily need rape laws, but the other crimes subsumed in rape that we really can't do without. For example, in order to rape a woman (I mean really rape her, not some feminist regret-rape) you have to violently assault/threaten/restrain her somehow, and that means you have already committed other crimes before you get to the sex. So rape would not be legal just because we abolish the crime of "rape," unless we also instate exemptions to a lot of other crimes for the purpose of rape. And that would be insane -- we would have a situation where you could knock someone out in the street or threaten them at gunpoint and then excuse yourself by saying you were only trying to rape them. But then again, feminist rhetorics is also insane, yet very successful at producing only slightly less insane laws, so maybe we really need to match their insanity in the opposite direction. The court of public opinion is not concerned with logic and coherence, after all. It is the narrative that matters, and I think the Daily Antifeminist is presenting a better alternative to feminism than the MRA movement has thus so far come up with.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-72346881151702059642018-01-16T08:35:13.797+01:002018-01-16T08:35:13.797+01:00"As I was about to tell this Gally person any..."As I was about to tell this Gally person anyway, nobody is threatening them. I am simply telling them a turn of events will come in which they will die. I never said I will be involved in these events or that I even know how they will exactly turn out aside from the notion that Muslims will kill them and rightly so. Now, if I were some Muslim ringleader it might be perceived as a threat but I am not. So what are you rambling about, Gally?"<br /><br />Okay, we may have a slight disagreement on precision of words, here.<br />Bare with me, as I try to lay out the logic here as I believe a prosecutor might have done it.<br /><br />You are using the word "WILL". As opposed to the word "MAY".<br />That choice of words is way strong, it means *inevitable* rather than *possible* (or *plausible, or *probable*), which means it carries the connotation that you either KNOW that what you claim "WILL" happen is INEVITABLE, and given that nobody can see the future that further means that you have special knowledge from groups that are capable of doing so and are intent on doing so, either through your own involvement or through different channels that are trustworthy beyond doubt to you personally.<br /><br />Either way, it's like this: Were I to say to a police officer for example, that "You WILL be killed", then that is in no way ambiguous or open to interpretation in my favour, should I be accused of uttering a direct threat.<br /><br />Now, threats being credible or not are a matter of separation: Anybody can, as Eivind rightfully points out, opine this or that on a blog and will most often not be considered to offer credible threats, but on a personal level for you caamib, you may still find yourself at the end of some degree of attention should you insist on using phrases that WOULD be talking yourself into trouble, AFK.<br /><br />And Norwegian law being what it is, recently cast a verdict that "Expression-responsibility is also under the law on social media" ( http://jonwesselaas.blogg.no/1515756550_ny_blogg.html ).<br /><br />Therefore, and pardon this rather longish rambling, you may wish to soften your language a little bit, and try to avoid speaking in certainties when you can in fact not be so certain.<br />Or, so I would recommend.<br /><br />As to who I am, well let's just say currently I'm a nobody so that's a good starting point.<br /><br />-GallyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-38437821901852863922018-01-16T03:58:40.496+01:002018-01-16T03:58:40.496+01:00https://dailyantifeminist.wordpress.com/2018/01/16...https://dailyantifeminist.wordpress.com/2018/01/16/rape-apologia-explainig-the-method-in-the-madness/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-23332847662846321212018-01-15T21:54:11.247+01:002018-01-15T21:54:11.247+01:00Yes, Caamib, there was no credible threat, so no w...Yes, Caamib, there was no credible threat, so no worries. Predicting a turn of events that you don't have any power over is not a threat, and I too hope it pans out that way. Muslims are indeed the greatest hope for men's rights in the current scheme of things. It's pretty clear by now that men's rights activism can't be marketed on its own; it needs to be part of a comprehensive worldview to gain any traction.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-87356276721550410532018-01-15T21:08:22.513+01:002018-01-15T21:08:22.513+01:00As I was about to tell this Gally person anyway, n...As I was about to tell this Gally person anyway, nobody is threatening them. I am simply telling them a turn of events will come in which they will die. I never said I will be involved in these events or that I even know how they will exactly turn out aside from the notion that Muslims will kill them and rightly so. Now, if I were some Muslim ringleader it might be perceived as a threat but I am not. So what are you rambling about, Gally?<br /><br />Eivind has the intelligence to see what I am talking about and has just warned me about going further, which I have no need to, since it is anyways highly unlikely that I will ever be involved in this nor do I know when it might happen.<br /><br />On the other side, it is noticeable that the person who wrote the original crap, be it Golly or not, I responded to didn't even bother to reply to what I said or replied to just a tiny bit of it. <br /><br />Also, remember fellas - I know what you are, even if you yourselves can't admit it. I understand liberalism and that it sees whiteness and maleness as original sins to be exterminated. If you claim you're against violence you're either straight out lying, in belief that violence against those you hate isn't really violence or just incredibly naive and to get your delusions shattered in front of you once you realize what you're for. I know you. Don't forget that. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-87089411101676731322018-01-15T20:51:32.192+01:002018-01-15T20:51:32.192+01:00Child porn laws are weapons of mass criminalizatio...Child porn laws are weapons of mass criminalization, the most potent poison in the feminist arsenal. As a purely symbolic crime, it can be endlessly replicated to incriminate the entire population within seconds if desired. And the moronic populace still think there is some substance to this crime, because that is how dimwitted and obsequious they are. As MRAs we need to look down on them and insult their intelligence at every opportunity, and maybe they will snap out of it and not let the cops have this ridiculously easy power over them.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-23827689875486502902018-01-15T18:26:00.175+01:002018-01-15T18:26:00.175+01:00http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42694218http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42694218Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-14718424974006126232018-01-15T18:25:08.107+01:002018-01-15T18:25:08.107+01:00And we are off to a great new year for the role of...And we are off to a great new year for the role of the police as the new sexual moral priests of our time: Denmark Facebook sex video: More than 1,000 young people charged<br /><br />Good luck with... that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-66868998531529665722018-01-14T19:59:47.360+01:002018-01-14T19:59:47.360+01:00Eller jeg bør vel bare kalle den NTNU-gjengen lede...Eller jeg bør vel bare kalle den NTNU-gjengen ledet av Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair for halvveis antifeministisk. De kjøper tydeligvis feministenes ideologi om at såkalt seksuell trakassering er noe som bør tas på alvor og slås ned på (noe jeg ikke gjør!), men samtidig forklarer de det med naturlige kjønnsforskjeller og drifter i stedet for feministenes uvitenskapelige teorier. Altså at kvinner ikke overraskende opplever uønsket seksuell oppmerksomhet fordi menn faktisk vil ha sex med dem i langt større grad enn de er villige til å gi etter for, og at menn samtidig "trakasserer" hverandre når de konkurrerer om kvinner og derfor omtaler hverandre nedsettende osv. Jeg anerkjenner ikke noen av delene som upassende oppførsel, men det gjør denne gjengen av evolusjonspsykologer. De har vitenskapen i orden, men ikke ideologien, for de er i bunn og grunn feminister. Da er det kanskje ikke så rart at de støtter opp under #metoo-kampanjen også.<br /><br />Så da blir spørsmålet, <i>hvorfor</i> skal vi akseptere at kvinner liksom skal ha rett til å slippe unna all uønsket seksuell oppmerksomhet, og at menn angivelig heller ikke skal kunne utsette hverandre for noen som helst ubehageligheter i konkurransen om kvinner? Ingen, absolutt ingen, har klart å gi noen fornuftig begrunnelse for å akseptere denne ideologien, heller ikke evolusjonsbiologien. <i>Spesielt</i> ikke evolusjonsbiologien, for det er absurd å gå så til de grader mot vår natur. Det er greit å ha lover og regler mot ekte voldtekt eller at menn kan bruke vold til å eliminere konkurrenter, men ikke seksuell trakassering, som er et konsept jeg overhodet ikke anerkjenner som noe som bør slås ned på. Mannsbevegelsens standpunkt bør være at vi slett ikke anerkjenner konseptet og derfor ikke tar noen av anklagene på alvor selv om de skulle være sanne.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-9143372160461519792018-01-14T19:04:14.630+01:002018-01-14T19:04:14.630+01:00"Jeg noterer meg spesielt at evolusjonspsykol..."Jeg noterer meg spesielt at evolusjonspsykologi-gjengen ved NTNU, som liksom har gjort det seksuelle spillet til sin spesialitet, er påfallende tause."<br /><br />De er vel for redde for å miste jobben til å si så mye offentlig nå som den minste anklage er nok, men de har faktisk publisert antifeministiske artikler om temaet.<br /><br />For eksempel denne motsier det feministiske våset om at såkalt seksuell trakassering er til for å undertrykke kvinner og ikke på grunn av menns naturlige trang til promiskuitet:<br /><br />https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2469456<br /><br />Evolution and human behavior. 2017, 38 (5), 583-591. <br /><br />Abstract<br /><br />Sexual harassment has traditionally been studied as men's harassment of women. This has led to a lack of knowledge about same sex harassment, and women harassing peers. This has also downplayed the inherent sexual nature of sexual harassment acts. While keeping in mind that sexual harassment is undesirable and causes distress, one needs to consider that many acts that are perceived as unwanted may not primarily be motivated by a wish to derogate but rather by an interest in soliciting short-term sex. In the current study we examined both perpetrators as well as victims of harassment, and specified both sex of perpetrator and target (a total of eight sex constellations). We reproduced the previously found association between unrestricted sociosexuality and sexual harassment in a representative sample of 1326 high school students (57% women). In all regression models sociosexuality outcompeted traditional measures such as porn exposure, rape stereotypes and hostile sexism. Based on the original work we divided the harassment acts into two groups of tactics: sexual solicitation and competitor derogation. Men were particularly subject to derogatory tactics from other men, while women were particularly subject to solicitation from opposite sex peers. Sexual harassment may be understood better from a human sexual strategies perspective, including competitor derogation and mate solicitation. As such, sociosexual orientation predicts both same sex derogation and opposite sex solicitation. The current results highlight the importance of considering the sex of both perpetrator and target. This advanced understanding of the inherently sexual nature of sexual harassment needs to inform future prevention studies. Unrestricted sociosexuality predicts sexual harassment in all constellations better than traditional social science models.<br /><br />Flere artikler her:<br /><br />https://www.ntnu.no/ansatte/leif.edward.kennair<br />Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-35399284479154897142018-01-14T18:44:44.223+01:002018-01-14T18:44:44.223+01:00With regard to the following comment:
"For t...With regard to the following comment:<br /><br />"<i>For the record, I am against violence of all kinds, and I recommend one does not threathen others.<br /><br />Thank you for your consideration.<br /><br />-Gally</i>"<br /><br />Yes, this blog must stay legal, or else we risk censorship or worse. While commenters are personally responsible for their own comments, for the sake of the preservation of this blog I must emphasize that I cannot tolerate illegal content. So kindly refrain from posting such, or I will have to delete it. Expressions of sentiments, including hateful ones as long as they are legal (for example, in Norway you can say you hate an ideology but not a race or religion), and how we would like to change the law are fine. And there is, of course, (at least) one kind of violence which is permissible to advocate, and that is the enforcement of laws. The important thing is that we advocate for changing the law via democratic means rather than incite insurrection. Norwegian law gives us a bit more leeway, however, as we can legally advocate for crimes as long as we don't specifically and publicly ask somebody to carry them out. So it is fine to say that insurrection would be a good thing and morally justified and statements to that effect. But please don't go any further here. To be on the safe side, it is probably best to avoid that milder kind of advocacy as well except perhaps in very broad terms. Focus on ideology and the moral depravity of our enemies, and if the MRA movement has any potential to make a difference, action will flow organically when we win the battle of ideas, I think. At least that is my impression of how other successful movements do it. When there is enough anger, riots just spontaneously erupt without anyone inciting them, and until then nothing can convince the crowds to act anyway.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-4930653204865366972018-01-14T14:04:45.718+01:002018-01-14T14:04:45.718+01:00I am perplexed by a myth spread by straight men. T...I am perplexed by a myth spread by straight men. The blatant lie that adult women are somehow superior to adolescent girls.<br /><br />The so-called’ normal’ heterosexual men claim that adults women are better off, have a better head, spread their legs only to the most appropriate guys (poor losers) blah, blah, blah, blah….<br /><br />A… FUCKING… SHIT…<br /><br />Adult women are TEN THOUSAND TIMES MORE repugnant, heartless, heartless, childish, irresponsible, irrational, slutty, cruel and impassive than Teenagers.<br /><br />I encourage to men to THINK FOR HIMSELF, suggesting that they google for ADULT WOMAN, and see all the junk that comes up. In today’s woman, coming of age is just a pass to do what literally comes out of their vagina.<br /><br />To be blunt, adult women are rubbish.<br /><br />So why do men today so affirm that adults are superior?<br /><br />Simple… they’re better manipulating than Teenagers.<br /><br />If you think about this, it makes a lot of sense.<br /><br />Adult women have nothing to offer about a girl under the age of 18, NO beauty, NO intelligence, NO better conversation, NO ability to bear children and have a family, NO even better, in fact the skin of their bodies literally just rots more and more every day. The peak of a female to offer all this is 14 to 16 years. So what a adult woman can have to offer a man?<br /><br />Nothing.<br /><br />So the narcissistic sex despots (Feminists) on this side of the planet (West) have only had to manipulate decent human beings for decades to turn them into today’s manginas. Encouraging male sexual mutilation, i. e. denouncing sex and marriage with girls under the age of 18, applauding violent and hateful women like Kathy Gifford, Madonna or Rosie O’ Donnell. They idolize mature New York sex-type women as the new up-and-coming scam artists to catch up idiotic beta men who don’t know they could be fucking with their new 16-year-old girlfriend tomorrow.<br /><br />Women in the West have had no choice but to manipulate decent human beings for decades. Men are really interested in Teenagers, they just think we’ve all forgotten it!<br /><br />To sum it up:<br /><br />Adult women ARE superior to Teenagers because they are better at manipulating men to forget and deny their attraction to Teenagers, because they are better actresses acting as decent human beings… something that is now less obvious because females in this world have forgotten how…. no longer have any reason to act well… the vicious women have had and have the men grabbed by the balls, and are now seeking to spread their hatred of healthy men to other countries (such as Japan, where adolescent women are still “pretty”).<br /><br />If men were to marry 13-17 year old girls as we were doing before even Ancient Greece existed until 60 years ago, then those women would grow up with a good husband and not need to manipulate men to get one. Then, and only then, will I give adult women a hint of credit.<br /><br />Anyway, it looks like they’re right. Adult women ARE SUPERIOR.<br /><br />ARE BETTER MANIPULATORS.<br /><br />END.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-83227108845702339672018-01-13T09:59:03.607+01:002018-01-13T09:59:03.607+01:00That is coming from a criminal "defense"...That is coming from a criminal "defense" law firm which is parasitical on those laws. The higher the age of consent, the more clients they get to defend from that artificial problem, so why would they oppose it?Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-36501946316433168402018-01-13T03:53:08.835+01:002018-01-13T03:53:08.835+01:00https://www.allenlawaz.com/age-of-consent-laws-in-...https://www.allenlawaz.com/age-of-consent-laws-in-arizona/<br /><br />Here it says openly that a teenager up to 17 (even says after theirs teens!) is unable to make decisions about his own body using ridiculous studies. age of consent to 18 that most vile place, death to USA!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-73241397421646654252018-01-13T01:05:51.677+01:002018-01-13T01:05:51.677+01:00Ingen ting overgår den øredøvende tausheten til Ha...Ingen ting overgår den øredøvende tausheten til Hadia Tajik under den mannlige kjønnslemlestelses-debatten.<br /><br />Det var et skuespill i studert narsissisme.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-39739125203775647432018-01-12T22:26:38.750+01:002018-01-12T22:26:38.750+01:00Andresen!Andresen!Øyvind Holmstadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04750850581311963220noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-25059432724006704612018-01-12T22:25:55.109+01:002018-01-12T22:25:55.109+01:00Trond Endresen:
"Hvorfor sitter alle folka s...Trond Endresen:<br /><br />"Hvorfor sitter alle folka som støtter den evolusjonspsykologiske forståelsesmåten så jævla stille i båten under #metoo-hysteriet?<br /><br />Det evolusjonært utvikla og kjønnsdrift-baserte spillet mellom mann og kvinne er det blitt kjettersk å snakke om. I stedet handler det om å falle på kne for ekstrem moralisme og se gjennom fingrene med falskspill og hykleri.<br /><br />Jeg noterer meg spesielt at evolusjonspsykologi-gjengen ved NTNU, som liksom har gjort det seksuelle spillet til sin spesialitet, er påfallende tause."Øyvind Holmstadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04750850581311963220noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-87109469271151832102018-01-12T20:22:34.870+01:002018-01-12T20:22:34.870+01:00For the record, I am against violence of all kinds...For the record, I am against violence of all kinds, and I recommend one does not threathen others.<br /><br />Thank you for your consideration.<br /><br /><br />-GallyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-8641683982717223202018-01-12T16:40:33.389+01:002018-01-12T16:40:33.389+01:00"Why is MRA obsessed with the sensationalized..."Why is MRA obsessed with the sensationalized cases of child sex?"<br /><br />I can't speak for other MRAs (and I'm not entirely sure I am one, precisely), but I do have a case that I could talk about, IF you are genuinely interested.<br /><br />So tell me two things, if you would be so kind and then we could have an honest discussion here:<br />"I’ve worked with law enforcement on online child exploitation cases, and 95% of them are disgusting horrible cases of abuse."<br /><br />1)<br />In what capacity have you "worked with" law enforcement, and in which nation?<br /><br />2)<br />Are you familiar with the concept of "bias", such as in "survivor bias" and especially "selection bias"?<br /><br /><br />Cheers,<br />that guy. yeah, the one. At the four-letter uni.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-66381622569329902412018-01-11T10:49:13.262+01:002018-01-11T10:49:13.262+01:00Recently jealous females have been attacking James...Recently jealous females have been attacking James Franco for trying to get with 17 year old girls, you would talk about it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com