tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post1367911530591332135..comments2024-03-28T10:43:26.059+01:00Comments on Eivind Berge's Blog: The persecution of Kandice BarberEivind Bergehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comBlogger111125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-34563363678480152082021-10-13T06:53:55.103+02:002021-10-13T06:53:55.103+02:00@holocaust22 @Eivind Berge
hi guys (i know holoca...@holocaust22 @Eivind Berge<br /><br />hi guys (i know holocaust22 from freespeechtube (not brainwashed is me)<br /><br />this teacher case is not abuse, only the teacher is being harmed by facing jail.<br /><br />im no hypocrite, if it were a male teacher with female pupil i have no prob either!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10759082112622243489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-31053819913435483102021-04-19T13:19:00.927+02:002021-04-19T13:19:00.927+02:00I think I understand PR better than you and have c...I think I understand PR better than you and have considerably more experience since I have actually been famous and not hiding under a rock like you. Why did you even delete your blog? It is not far from the truth that any PR is good PR, and though I am as much horrified by some of the things Nathan Larson wrote as anybody, I refuse to let that determine my opinion of him. It is much more important what he actually accomplished. Judging him by his most outrageous statements would be akin to thinking the feminists are good because they say they want "gender equality." We know we have to judge them by the effect of their laws and we know how that goes. All I know Nathan Larson actually did was attract lots of girls to his "rape" forums, so it must have been a very good kind of rape he was advocating. With laws these days it is inevitable that a lot of rape is good and if that's the word girls use, why not play along with it? Ultimately the feminists should regret legislating good rape into existence, and this is a great way to teach them.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-68709913616613623592021-04-19T09:39:55.737+02:002021-04-19T09:39:55.737+02:00"It is something about the interplay between ..."It is something about the interplay between human nature and the current environment that makes it so bad."<br /><br />You still haven't a clue have you Eivind?<br /><br />"About Nathan larson. Do you consider him to be a male sexualist? He seems like a legit sociopath. Didn't he have a "rape" and "kidnapping" website. And he supported marital rape and hitler? Seems like bad PR lol.<br /><br />I don't doubt that the media and American filth have exaggerated the nature of his 'forums', but still, the guy seems to have been a bit of a loon. Eivind doesn't understand the meaning of the word PR. I think it's fair to say that the idea of a 'Male Sexualist movement' has been killed now if it hadn't already been by Tom Grauer.<br /><br />I agree with everything Jack said in his analysis of the situation. As I get into my fifties and having a few brushes with major illnesses and such, the thought that I'm going to die without even having registered a pin prick against the Sexual Holocaust is almost too much to bear. How did this happen? Well objectively I did my part. I screamed into the wind for over a decade. At least I knew who the enemy was and why they were and are doing this (and that's quite a thing in our 'movement'). Any feminist who read my writings knew at least there was one person who could look their hideous visages in the eye and recognize them for what they were. There is absolutely no hope for us. Technology might change things but it will likely take decades or even centuries to overturn all the anti-sex attitudes and legislation that have become so embedded. Now I think is the time to leave the floor entirely to Eivind and his 'civil disobedience'. Eivind should continue his conversion to progressive attitudes by identifying as a woman. Maybe if he's lucky he'll get to share a cell in a Norwegian holiday camp with a female sex offender! Although to his disappointment, she'll probably only suck the prison guard's dicks in front of him while looking at him with disgust and contempt.<br /><br />Ciao.theantifeministnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-58660925601423042342021-04-16T22:47:57.578+02:002021-04-16T22:47:57.578+02:00Yes, I consider Nathan Larson a male sexualist. No...Yes, I consider Nathan Larson a male sexualist. Not necessarily all his writing, but the sum of what he is known for makes him one of us. The bad words with which you associate him are just what society would call us all. He didn't seem interested in using different words, but why bother when society and law will call us rapists anyway? He passed that feminist shit-test with flying colors by agreeing and amplifying and attracting girls to his sites and his personal life who can't get enough of the good kind of rape. By the way, the popularity of his site with girls proves there are good girls here too, so you don't necessarily need to go to different cultures. Society can condemn and punish all it wants, but it can't eradicate the kind of "abuse" that girls eagerly participate in.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-30545280286208718972021-04-16T15:16:22.407+02:002021-04-16T15:16:22.407+02:00@eivind berge
I'm a guitar player as well. Ha...@eivind berge<br /><br />I'm a guitar player as well. Have a lesson later today actually. There are guitar teachers on preply that teach through video calls for only 12$ an hour. There's also guitartricks, and yousician, that work well together. There are a lot of songs that have two guitar players, so both of us playing the same instrument works. <br /><br />About Nathan larson. Do you consider him to be a male sexualist? He seems like a legit sociopath. Didn't he have a "rape" and "kidnapping" website. And he supported marital rape and hitler? Seems like bad PR lol. <br /><br />@theantifeminist<br /><br />"I cannot grasp the Millennial generation of brainwashed snowflakes Their feeds (and all their teen friends apparently) are full of contant BLM, transgender rights, all men are bastards virtue signalling crap."<br /><br />My current gf is a 20 year old thai muslim university student (who I met when she was 19) She doesn't know what the AoC is, doesn't know what feminism or BLM is, has never said anything rude about men. And I can literally talk about hot 14 year olds to her, and it doesn't even exist in her mind that there's something wrong with that. I just don't date western girls, so I don't have to deal with things like this lol. And yes, I'm younger. I'm in my 20s. But I promise you I'll be dating 18 year olds when I'm in my 70s as well. Just don't make a big deal about it, and don't talk to western girls that follow a culture you don't agree with. Leftists, and feminists, are annoying to me. Any girl that acted like how you mentioned, I would just stop talking to her. And talk to another hot 18 year old. <br /><br />You have the internet. You can download a language learning program like hello talk, and talk to thousands of 18 year olds anywhere in the world. China, thailand, cambodia, vietnam, etc. Just find a cool girl unaffected by western leftist BS, move to her country, and live with her. <br /><br />https://vt.tiktok.com/ZSXW7uL7/<br /><br />Here's a 17 year old in thailand dating a 50 year old man, uploading cute tiktok videos with him. They have 67 thousand likes. <br /><br />The west just isn't our culture. And every male sexualist should 100% drop western culture. They believe different stuff than us. We're not a part of their group. <br /><br />"Even the best PUAs have to devote hours a day to get regular lays, and truth be told, unless they are 6ft+ young and good looking, the quality isn't great (unless you're as thirsty as Eivind)"<br /><br />This is a barrier you're putting up in your mind. Just know you're the shit, the king, and that you're better than everyone else. And you will get hot teens. <br /><br />holocaust22noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-4109104721773155042021-04-16T12:25:53.041+02:002021-04-16T12:25:53.041+02:00Yes, it is pretty grim. But still, the norm for hu...Yes, it is pretty grim. But still, the norm for human societies is to have far less oppressive sexual regulations than now. It is something about the interplay between human nature and the current environment that makes it so bad. The malignant, well-funded police state plays no small part, and the underlying prosperity that makes this possible. So does technology. Imagine explaining to the Iceland-faring poet I cited above that a hundred years later he would not only be a criminal for portraying 15-year-old girls as geysers of sexual desire, but there would be a monstrous police force dangling such temptations before men just so they can entrap them, and digitally faked girls at that. It is mind-bogglingly hateful when you think about it, how far antisex has come and how unnatural it is by any view of humanity that doesn’t just focus on the last few decades.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-28348072787888037412021-04-16T11:08:17.133+02:002021-04-16T11:08:17.133+02:00Let's recap what human societies are made of:
...Let's recap what human societies are made of:<br /><br />Women who have near to zero interest in sex per se with men, and whose obsession in life consists in preventing younger and prettier women from putting out. This is so bad that even an 80-year-old hag with no hope of ever again attracting any man will still see it as her holy duty to ruin sex attempts by younger people if she can.<br /><br />Men hard-wired to above everything else eliminate or cock-block rivals. Self-defeating idiots who will support any anti-sex legislation limiting their access to pussy, as long as it also prevents OTHER MEN from scoring.<br /><br />Now tell me, what could possibly go wrong?<br /><br />You cannot change the make-up of human societies. Societies in History that seem in retrospect to have been masculinist were only so because the male population got decimated by warfare and supply and demand got skewed in favour of men. <br /><br />Those were also societies in which tuberculosis and incurable STDs reigned.Jacknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-11024657137975585402021-04-16T01:52:28.208+02:002021-04-16T01:52:28.208+02:00As chance would have it, I just came across this i...As chance would have it, I just <a href="https://twitter.com/ashleydzhang/status/1382782481439485954" rel="nofollow">came across this inspirational quote regarding civil disobedience</a>:<br /><br /><b>When Thoreau was jailed for refusing to pay taxes to a government which supported slavery, Emerson went to visit him. “Henry David,” said Emerson, “what are you doing in there?” Thoreau looked at him and replied, “Ralph Waldo, what are <i>you</i> doing out <i>there</i>?”</b><br /><br />That's the spirit! What are we lesser male sexualist activists doing outside jail when good men like Nathan Larson are in there?!Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-19099359030584005982021-04-15T20:03:01.501+02:002021-04-15T20:03:01.501+02:00A lot to disagree with there. I am unmoved by any ...A lot to disagree with there. I am unmoved by any argument that it is “wrong” to break the sex laws. The “iatrogenic harm” argument that you dredged up earlier has no relevance with the ages of girls that we are concerned with, and very little with actual children either according to recent studies. It is a lot harder than previously imagined to brainwash girls into genuinely feeling abused when they are not, and when I rethink all the evidence I’ve encountered in my life critically, I am not aware of any credible examples of this done to teen girls. Sure, they have been cruelly coerced, even imprisoned in order to make them cooperate with antisex persecutions, but that is different from making them think sex itself was abusive. Let the “MAPs” worry about that, but certainly as far as male sexualism is concerned, civil disobedience is indeed the proper designation. I proudly note that at least two men closely associated with our movement have done so very publicly within the past year. In the case of Nathan Larson he ran his sites in the clearnet for all to see -- a paragon of civil disobedience! The problem is our movement is so tiny that we have no hope of making punishment impracticable yet, so I will concede that it is typically <i>inadvisable</i> to break these laws, as distinct from wrong. That would change if they raised the age of consent all the way up to 30 though. Surely there is some point beyond which men would simply not even pretend to obey it?<br /><br />Also it is a ludicrous assertion that I became incel, and what makes you think I am not going the whole hog trying to impregnate women? The problem is most use contraception. There is some truth to your argument that contracepted sex is a bit like masturbation with regard to reproductive opportunity cost, but the difference in enjoyment and the meaningfulness of intimacy is still so huge that there is no comparison, at least as long as you avoid condoms.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-9402730807637845832021-04-15T09:55:33.171+02:002021-04-15T09:55:33.171+02:00@Eivind - your position on sex and impregnation do...@Eivind - your position on sex and impregnation doesn't make sense. Logically, if the reason you think sex with women is the ultimate and only natural thing for men, then you should go the whole hog and try to get every woman you lay pregnant. Otherwise, from an evolutionary POV, having protected sex is no different to wanking, in fact from your own argument it's even worse. You claim wanking is bad because it 'takes up resources', but having protected sex and all the chasing to get there takes up even more 'resources', not to mention the legal risks.<br /><br />However, not only do you deny all this (despite dumping Emma because she wouldn't have children and voluntarily turning yourself back into the incel you were before you met her), you wish to bring children into the world despite your fervent hope that civilization breaks down into a pre-industrial stage or even a pre-civilization state of anarchy.<br /><br />Sorry Eivind, but your children are going to likely possess the same traits as you - ie., being a bit nerdish. Such people don't last long in anarchic societies. Why would you want to bring up little Eivinds in a Mad Max world of post-industrial collapse?theantifeministnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-62210475736827047902021-04-15T09:46:25.197+02:002021-04-15T09:46:25.197+02:00@Holocaust22 - I was making a point about Eivind&#...@Holocaust22 - I was making a point about Eivind's approach to combining 'activism' with pursuing a sex life. Eivind will never stop pursuing pussy. He'll attempt to do so in a legal manner (which is the sensible and even the right thing to do), despite his 'civil disobedience' talk. This means staying within femihag age of consent laws, PUA laws etc. But given that the reason for all these laws is because the femihags are trying to get men to pursue them (or their support base of the majority of women), then you're just giving in and surrendering and feeding the system, validating the feminist State rape factory. Evind talks tough as though he's leading some kind of male sexual union ('male sexualists') but his philosophy of continuing to pursue whatever dwindling percentage of second rate pussy the femihags deign to allow us to, is more akin to a strike breaker - a scab.<br /><br />If the feminists raise the age of consent to 30, Eivind will pursue 30 year old women. Do you understand this?<br /><br />But yes, I could try to date 18 year olds or even 16 year olds who are technically still legal in Europe. You're obviously younger than me, and don't realize the hurdles for a 50+ year old man to date even 18 or 19 year olds, even if what you say about having 18/19 year old 'tens' is true (and I'm calling bull on that). Apart from that, I no longer have anything in common with teenage girls. I've exchanged social media with several 17 - 20 year old girls in the last few years and it's not just a generational gap anymore, it's something else. I cannot grasp the Millennial generation of brainwashed snowflakes Their feeds (and all their teen friends apparently) are full of contant BLM, transgender rights, all men are bastards virtue signalling crap. Of course, you being a good progressive feminist might have more in common.<br /><br />I don't believe that homeless guy story. PUA has been exposed as largely bunkum a long time ago. I don't know much about you, and sorry if I'm mistaken, but I'd guess you're exaggerating like you're probably exaggerating about being a 'kickboxer'. You've been to kickboxing classes so you call yourself a kickboxer. You approach lots of girls and you've been on a few dates with hot 18 and 19 year old girls, so you say your 'last girlfriends were 18 yo HB10s'. If I approached ten 18 year old girls a day I'm sure I could end up going on regular dates and the occasional 'bang' with hot girls. I was doing that 5 years ago in my mid-forties. I just don't have the time or the emotional energy anymore. I can't really take the jealous looks and nasty comments that I get when even out with 21 year old women these days. Nor the emotional trauma of being sadistically rejected by girls every day (if I approached girls every day), the frequent stand ups, friendzoning, cock blocking from BFFs and parents at the last moment etc etc just to get the occasional lay (which itself as Eivind points out is risky these days even if 'legal'). BTW, in the UK talking to a woman in the street looks likely to be made officially illegal (a misogynistic 'hate crime') soon, even if it was only vaguely so already (enough to have one PUA put in prison). Apart from that, I just don't have time. Even the best PUAs have to devote hours a day to get regular lays, and truth be told, unless they are 6ft+ young and good looking, the quality isn't great (unless you're as thirsty as Eivind).<br /><br />I'm too busy these days. I may try to approach at least one girl a week in the summer when I'm out and about (I don't live in the UK fortunately), but other than that, I'd rather wank and/or see pros. If you're young and have the time and energy, go for it (with extreme caution). If you're 50, then the best way is probably MGTOW. <br /><br />theantifeministnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-77302802296920979682021-04-14T18:26:49.467+02:002021-04-14T18:26:49.467+02:00Good question... It would be so cool to play the g...Good question... It would be so cool to play the guitar or something, but as a reality check I would have to start from scratch with musical training and I really don't have a clue how to learn this. Maybe I could try to sing, or are you good at that?Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-69791954886926557892021-04-14T18:17:04.752+02:002021-04-14T18:17:04.752+02:00@eivind berge
"Thanks for that idea. Yes, I...@eivind berge <br /><br />"Thanks for that idea. Yes, I do want to start a band although I am not sure how to practically go about it, what with the distance and lack of skills/equipment"<br /><br />What instrument are you interested in playing?holocaust22noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-66846052334676979132021-04-13T14:53:19.890+02:002021-04-13T14:53:19.890+02:00We should be tolerant of different tastes. MacKenz...We should be tolerant of different tastes. MacKenzie Scott also remarried, proving that there is someone for everybody:<br /><br />https://people.com/human-interest/what-to-know-about-mackenzie-scotts-new-husband-teacher-dan-jewett/Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-67755276457847714192021-04-13T14:16:06.303+02:002021-04-13T14:16:06.303+02:00@eivind berge
Ewww, 51. Wtf is wrong with Jeff Be...@eivind berge<br /><br />Ewww, 51. Wtf is wrong with Jeff Bezos. Granny shagger. holocaust22noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-76129926029924320102021-04-13T14:12:46.537+02:002021-04-13T14:12:46.537+02:00I and most men WANT to support their families. The...I and most men WANT to support their families. The numbers that you just cited, Jack, indicate that you as an antinatalist don't understand that concept at all and think any expense for family or children is alimony slavery. Of course we don't want to be kicked out of our families and reduced to slaves, but it doesn't happen anywhere near as much as you think. Even the MRAs who were concerned about this seem to have disappeared, and thought they did have a point and somewhat still do, the malignant sex-hostility of feminism is much more important to fight against.<br /><br />Since the demise of the old manosphere ten years ago I had almost forgotten that this whole alimony/child support issue existed... Sure I heard of Jeff Bezos’ $38-billion divorce settlement, but who feels sorry for him? It doesn’t seem to be a serious problem for regular guys anymore, unless they are even more docile and silently suffering about this than the sex laws.<br /><br />By the way, you would think Jeff Bezos at least would take the opportunity to get with a younger woman after dishing out all that, but instead his new girlfriend Lauren Sánchez is 51. There are clearly plenty of opportunities for older women too, which makes the feminists’ vindictiveness against sex with teen girls even more evil.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-71442241519820292022021-04-13T13:57:25.118+02:002021-04-13T13:57:25.118+02:00@jack
This is ridiculous jack. I have no job at a...@jack<br /><br />This is ridiculous jack. I have no job at all, and don't even have a GeD. Yet my last three girlfriends were 18-19 year old 10s. <br /><br />If you have basic social skills, you can pick up middle class bangers even if you're ugly and homeless. <br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmav517MQJc&ab_channel=Bustle<br /><br />Here's a homeless guy that beds 130 girls a year. <br /><br />You don't need looks or money to get girls. And I've personally been a male gold digger in the past, getting hundreds of dollars given to me for free by women. <br /><br />If you're dating a gold digger slut that makes you an "alimony slave" then stop dating girls like this. There are millions of girls not like this. holocaust22noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-85292937529449872352021-04-13T04:03:48.195+02:002021-04-13T04:03:48.195+02:00What I want to remind this point is that long befo...What I want to remind this point is that long before criminal sex abuse charges against men became the norm, men were already systemically raped by family law, this being, of course, the field of battle of traditional MRAs. However much we on this forum dislike traditional MRAs for their kowtowing to the abuse industry, the what they have been fighting for was legit, for most women have never wanted men in jail, they have wanted men to work for them. A man in jail was only beneficial to a woman if he was a rich man who could be made to cough up a pile of money at one go, but most men are more useful to women as slaves outside jail. There are ten thousand times more men who are alimony slaves than men jailed for sexual victimless crimes. Better be an alimony slave than in jail, yet when men become alimony slaves, their useful life comes at an end too.<br /><br />Eivind here who is more than willing to father children in order to score bareback sex runs a high risk of becoming an alimony slave. What will you sexual market value be like Eiving, on one third of what you're earning now? Jacknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-18604908446050964932021-04-12T22:49:20.793+02:002021-04-12T22:49:20.793+02:00It's bizarre how sexuality has gone from their...It's bizarre how sexuality has gone from their most salient feature at that age to something they supposedly don't possess or can't handle at all. Culture used to know very well that this isn't even true for girls, and now boys are suddenly supposed to be as asexual as girls never were until the insanity of feminism. We just need to make society snap out of this delusion, for which we need civil disobedience on a large scale. Why are people so damn obedient anyway?Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-8288916330428262962021-04-12T21:39:06.567+02:002021-04-12T21:39:06.567+02:00https://win.gg/news/4870/puppeh-captainzach-accuse...https://win.gg/news/4870/puppeh-captainzach-accuse-cinnpie-nairo-of-statutory-rape<br /><br />14 year old guy accuses hot 20 year old cinnpie of "grooming" him. <br /><br />He says her blowjobs gave him a "mental illness" LOL<br /><br />@theantifeminist Why don't you just date a hot 18 year old 12th grader. Instead of 30 year olds. <br /><br />holocaust22noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-20378169126506063022021-04-12T16:18:10.167+02:002021-04-12T16:18:10.167+02:00@theantifeminist
I am sorry to burst your bubble ...@theantifeminist<br /><br />I am sorry to burst your bubble that you can still have legal sex, at least in Norway. It doesn’t matter if she is 40, sex is still illegal. Ever since the introduction of negligent rape in the year 2000, there has been no such thing as legal sex even in principle. The concept of negligent rape destroys men's ability to know that sex is legal by necessity of the law's hateful design that was recognized at the time but now has been normalized as something men are just supposed to live with, so worthless are we. You cannot have a justified true belief that sex is legal because it can easily nonetheless turn out to be false by a process that is only one whimsical accusation away. Even if you fully believed it was legal and the court believes that you believed it, it can still be convicted as negligent rape when women have their regrets and accuse you, and if there is one thing history has thought us, this just keeps getting more likely. The best you can do is a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem" rel="nofollow">Gettier example</a>, where you chance into believing the same conclusion that courts still reach in a dwindling number of cases that sex was in fact legal -- which is already being reduced closer to zero thanks to the abolition of the jury. But you cannot KNOW that it was legal beforehand or during, and thus there is no such thing as legal sex even in principle by any reasonable epistemic definition since you cannot live your life with the foreknowledge of what a feminist court will decide faced with an accusation of negligent rape. Negligent rape can be anything that by definition you don’t know about such as a claimed fear in her head that you were threatening due to some reason only she can think of -- age difference, your job or status or reputation or whatever she damn well pleases -- the list is endless. Indeed they will probably convict you of deliberate rape anyway even if you harbor your naïve belief like they did to Gaute Drevdal and so many men who fully believed they were having consensual, legal sex but still ended up as convicted first-degree “rapists.”<br /><br />And no, obviously I won’t promote the remaining “legal” sex as things get worse because there is no such thing even now. We are long past the point of universal criminality, so being a sex offender is the only game in town for men.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-8643695396235225962021-04-12T13:54:08.797+02:002021-04-12T13:54:08.797+02:00That's an excellent idea, thanks, and obviousl...That's an excellent idea, thanks, and obviously civil disobedience against the sex laws doesn't need to stop at that one.<br /><br />By the way, I just read a powerful sexualization of minors in my local paper <i>Strilen</i>, of all places. Sometimes a glimpse at a sane view of sexuality still seeps through the antisex bigotry that feminists try to enforce now. Whether it got published by negligence or civil disobedience I do not know, but this is absolutely beautiful. Some dude from around here named Karl Øvretveit went to Iceland in 1920 and wrote about it. In the course of describing The Great Geysir that Iceland is famous for, when he needs the sexiest, horniest image for this attraction at the height of her prowess and beauty as opposed to her dull old age when she barely wants to squirt anymore even when you lube her well up with soap, he describes a girl in her fifteenth year (meaning 14?). Obviously, to us, but unfortunately for the feminists. They can't suppress the truth about healthy sexuality entirely because it is suffused in our cultural heritage all the way up to the past couple of decades when feminist censorship really got underway.<br /><br />Here is a link where you can find it on page 42-43:<br /><br />https://issuu.com/aslokalavisene/docs/2021-01-19_strilen_-_2021-01-19<br /><br />And I will quote the beautiful thoughtcriminal poem here:<br /><br /><i>Soleis tenkte eg meg Geisir: «Sjå no er Geisir tagna, ho søver seg i blund, og stormen er stilna i bringa. No er ho gamall vorti og venter kvar ei stund at klokkene i Haukedal skal klinga.<br /><br />Men lenge, lenge sidan <b>då ho var ung og kåt, som ei møy i det femtande året</b>, ho gilja seg i heksedans og svir og harpelåt, og nækte seg for kvar ein framand dåre.<br /><br />Ho nigja til deim alle, ho skratta og ho lo, so meste ho gjekk i frå sansen; og danar og tyskar og engelskmenn stod og takkade so høvisk for dansen.<br /><br />Men mange vilde leika, ja -- mange, mange fleir, og trøytt ho vart og laut seg kvila taka. Dei gav henne såpa: tri-fire pund og meir fyrr rett dei kunde få 'ne til å vaka.<br /><br />Og såpeskrauvet valt, og dei smurde henne trutt og tala blidt og glodde og gåpa; men svevnen var for tung, og so skyna dei til slutt ho ferdig var, det hjelpte inkje såpa.<br /><br />Og no er ho tagna, ho søver seg i blund, og stormen er stilna i bringa, og gamall er ho vorti og ventar kvar ei stund at klokkune i Haukadal skal klinga.»</i><br /><br />I'll have coffee and cookies ready if the antisex pigs show up, but given that they also would have to incriminate the newspaper and all its readers, I doubt they will bother this time.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-53250598498107652502021-04-12T13:13:00.071+02:002021-04-12T13:13:00.071+02:00Jeg skal tilføje at denne form for civil ulydighed...Jeg skal tilføje at denne form for civil ulydighed rent faktisk fandt sted tilbage i 70'erne i Italien, tilrettelagt af Partito Radicale, som plejede at føre sig frem på en provokatorisk og iøjnefaldende måde. I protest mod at censuren havde forbudt Bertoluccis "Sidste Tango i Paris" og dømt alle eksemplarerne af filmen til at blive destrueret, arrangerede partiet en offentlig fremvisning som blev reklameret nøjagtigt på samme måde som beskrevet i min kommentar ovenfor. Politiet dukkede op og konfiskerede filmeksemplarerne, men aktionen tiltrak opmærksomhed og fik offentlig omtale, hvilket til sidst resulterede i at filmen blev frigjort og censur blev afskaffet.<br />Ved en anden lejlighed udtænkte de Radikales karismatiske leder, Marco Pannella (som i øvrigt døde for et par år siden), en anden aktion, hvor han midt i en TV-udsendelse på den største nationale TV-kanal, som han var blevet inviteret i, pludselig tog en klump hashish ud af lommen og forærede den til TV-værten. Det gjorde han for at opfordre til legalisering af privat besiddelse af euforiserende stoffer, som var en af partiets mærkesager.<br />Han kom senere i retten hvor han forklarede baggrunden for sin happening, og dommerne var sympatetiske og dømte ham kun til en mindre betinget fængselsstraf.<br />Du kan læse om Marco Pannella her:<br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marco_Pannella<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-41963192890081150942021-04-12T12:25:24.817+02:002021-04-12T12:25:24.817+02:00Jeg fandt frem til denne kommentar som jeg postede...Jeg fandt frem til denne kommentar som jeg postede den for et par år siden. Den handlede netop om civil ulydighed:<br /><br /><i>Eivind, har du aldrig tænkt på civil ulydighed? I modsætning til drab på politimænd kunne den skaffe dig en del sympati og ville få dit budskab ud til det brede publikum, specielt hvis du lægger noget morsomt i det. Den kunne f.eks. lyde sådan her:<br /><br />"For at protestere mod den meningsløse krænkelse af ytringsfriheden i Norge vil jeg, EB, den [indsæt dato] uden for rådhuset i Bergen offentligt uddele erotiske noveller og hæfter med japanske tegneserier til de forbipasserende. Kom og grib chancen for helt gratis at komme i besiddelse af en ikke-litterær erotisk historie med personer under 18 år som hovedperson og en ægte japansk manga! Der vil desuden blive budt på gratis kaffe og kager. Politimesteren og påtalemyndigheden er velkomne".<br /><br />Hvis du annoncerer det ordentligt, ville du få stor omtale, og dommeren vil sandsynligvis give dig en mild dom på grund af det politiske budskab i din aktion.</i>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-84782781361935695952021-04-12T09:47:14.088+02:002021-04-12T09:47:14.088+02:00I remember reading a contrarian feminist book when...I remember reading a contrarian feminist book when I was a student a long, long time ago, before modern paedohysteria, and the author mentioned her view that a lot of men locked up for having sex with underage girls had chosen their sexual path for 'political reasons'. She was discussing this sympathetically in the context of a general discussion on the right to reject conventional sexual mores and the like. Unfortunately I can't remember the title or author at all. There's quite a few books I read or leafed through in bookshops decades ago that I would love to be able to remember the titles of.<br /><br />Anyway, just to be clear - having sex with underage teens is wrong because it gives the feminist State the power to abuse and destroy the young person through forced victimization and therapy. Not to mention it gives the teen the power to destroy you when she turns into a bitter hag.<br /><br />However, it does chime with my suggestion as to the MLTO movement - 'Men Love Teens Only'. That is strictly legal, more like a boycott of older women and being honest and unashamed of the fact that teenage girls are attractive.<br /><br />As to your theme of this post - it is possible to have a sex life legally even now. However, you can only do so at the cost of being raped by the (feminist) State. No matter how high they push up the age of consent, you (Eivind) will still chase women and claim anybody who doesn't is a 'zombie'. If the feminists raise the age of consent to 40, then you will be writing posts about how '40 year old women can still look good' and such. If feminists made it illegal to have sex with any woman who weighed less than 1,000 lbs, you'd be out there 24/7 on Tinder chasing 1,000 lb women and saying it's better than masturbation.<br /><br />Your only answer to the rigged sexual market is to continue to play along with it. You grandstand hypothetical intellectual thought experiments about choosing to have illegal sex with ripe girls as civil disobedience, but in the real world, you'll do the very opposite. <br /><br />And it all comes down to the fact that even now, after 15 years of blogging, you still don't understand what it's all about. Even when the likes of Diana Fleischman are spelling it out for you with big coloured crayons.<br /><br />Me, well I'll never break a feminist law if I can help it, no matter how insane or unjust. That's self-preservation as well as the desire (as regards AOC) not to harm (indirectly) young people. At the same time, I wont play their game and be forced into committed relationships with 30 year old post-wall women who support and benefit from the femihag rigged sexual market. <br /><br />I don't want to be raped.theantifeministnoreply@blogger.com