tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post1685116463422387191..comments2024-03-28T10:43:26.059+01:00Comments on Eivind Berge's Blog: Interview with Maxwell's demon about CP lawEivind Bergehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comBlogger52125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-81986739004874900782020-02-26T18:23:15.806+01:002020-02-26T18:23:15.806+01:00If Gary Wilson is against promiscuity for moral or...If Gary Wilson is against promiscuity for moral or religious reasons, then I don't agree with that but it would be his personal issue with no bearing on what he teaches about porn. It is also sad if he writes for the Good Men Project, but not enough to discredit him. If he believes in "sex addiction," however, then he is a charlatan and must be disowned by the male sexualists (though nofap is still valid for its own reasons). In my experience, however, he always made it clear that porn addiction is not a kind of "sex addiction" and I never saw him make funny claims about promiscuity either, even morally and certainly not biological or psychological ones.<br /><br />You have made very serious defamatory accusations against Gary Wilson that you now need to back up with evidence or else I need to be very clear for the record here that it is a lie!Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-43161045012258855532020-02-26T17:58:30.756+01:002020-02-26T17:58:30.756+01:00You have completely misunderstood what I stand for...You have completely misunderstood what I stand for. I do not believe "sex addiction" is a valid concept and the problem with porn use is precisely that it prevents full sexual expression, including promiscuity, which I have no problems with and know is profoundly satisfying to most men.<br /><br />I never heard of Gary Wilson attacking promiscuity either or claiming it bears any resemblance to porn addiction or makes men impotent like porn does. In fact I recall him say explicitly that frequent sex does not have such adverse effects, even with many women. Please provide references or else I will assume you are making that up.<br /><br />And obviously, The Good Men Project is a feminist site that I don't want to be associated with.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-34499040641170293562020-02-26T17:34:24.714+01:002020-02-26T17:34:24.714+01:00Keep up the good work Sir. It's wonderful that...Keep up the good work Sir. It's wonderful that you are spreading the word concerning the evils of porn addiction. I would invite you to come fully on board and also promote the dangers of sex addiction. Gary Wilson compared the brains of porn viewers and found similarities to those of cocaine addicts. He did the same with the brains of promiscuous men with frequent partners and found the same thing. I would welcome you to write an article on the evils of sex addiction - or 'sexual obesity' as we in the YourBrainOnPorn community are now calling it, from the perspective of Men's Rights. You would be doing your readers a service if you would take the opportunity to strike while the iron is hot, as it were, in relation to the Harvey Weinstein verdict, and pen a piece on sex addiction and the dangers it poses to a normal and consensual heterosexual long-term relationship. I would also invite you to submit your article to our long established site - The Good Men Project. You will be pleased to learn that none other than Gary Wilson is a regular writer there.<br /><br />https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ERtdXXlXsAADOnG?format=jpg&name=mediumFiona Cooperhttps://goodmenproject.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-34933939686660585322020-02-04T11:31:09.315+01:002020-02-04T11:31:09.315+01:00I also wish Matzneff and others now accused of &qu...I also wish Matzneff and others now accused of "historic sexual abuse" would stand up for themselves, but it's not really surprising that they don't because that's not how they were selected. Their surprise at the current hate is further evidence that their sexual behavior was normal anyway, and it didn't take an activist to say the sexualist things he said back in the day. He was merely a slightly edgy intellectual, and what are the odds someone like that will also be a resistance fighter when shit hits the fan?<br /><br />The kind of man who will resist a social order that literally seeks to remove dissidents (either by death or decades in prison) is not likely to be found in the cushy circles that Matzneff belonged to. They need to emerge from wherever it is the bravest of men are found, and most of those are now sadly brainwashed with feminist antisex bigotry.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-22133066204611850612020-02-04T01:05:16.630+01:002020-02-04T01:05:16.630+01:00I'd say they don't even have to go as far ...I'd say they don't even have to go as far as banning the science because the knowledge is already so much suppressed, and the sheep people are entirely scared and controlled by the left and right wing feminists.<br /><br />Regarding the un-innocence of children, two recent memories immediately come to mind. <br /><br />The first, I was at a waterpark with a good friend and his young niece, maybe 7 or 8. We were chilling in the pool, and she splashed water at me, so I splashed her back. From that point on, she made it her business to be at my side, and I also caught her checking out my trousers when they were wet, obviously outlining my piece. I have no attraction to pre-pubescent children, but I know what behavior I saw from her.<br /><br />The second, I was in the local museum, seated on a bench with about 6 other people. One of them was a girl around the age of 6 or 7. As I'm sitting on the bench, the girl stretches out, moves towards me, and touches my ass, leaving her hand there as if she was stretching her arms, but what she was doing was obvious. This startled me, as I didn't even see her before she touched me. I waited for a second, wondering what was going on, then decided to get up and move away. But again, I know what behavior I saw from her as well.<br /><br />Both girls also knew exactly what they were doing. All this was obvious and known to everyone before the right and left wing feminists took over.<br /><br />And great point that after menopause, if a female sees a way to get novel attention out of her sexuality, you can be damn sure she will exploit it for gain.<br /><br />My problem is with all these windbag boomers like Matzneff who turn into sad sacks of crying shit when the tables are turned on them. It's no wonder feminism was so easily able to take over the right and left wing when weak ass boomers like this are walking around. Don't they understand female nature? Don't they get that you have to treat them like fucking vipers or you risk ruin?<br /><br />This Matzneff guy should've got over his bullshit crying years ago, and instead embrace whatever anger is left in his old shriveled balls over the massive injustice currently being perpetrated against him. When will one of these old motherfuckers grow a pair and stand up for himself, and everyone else, who's been wronged by the system that is now governed by total feminism? What's there to lose, his pension is already gone and they want him dead. So his and others' solutions is to just lie down and take it up the ass from these feminists who already destroyed them? Gay.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-68407537486848778042020-02-03T19:48:59.424+01:002020-02-03T19:48:59.424+01:00When attention whores hit menopause, their only wa...When attention whores hit menopause, their only way to continue to receive attention is to turn into sadists and betray the man they loved. She-spiders eat the male after copulation, so what do you expect from a know woman anno 2020?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-25233203680731301112020-02-03T18:49:49.252+01:002020-02-03T18:49:49.252+01:00Yes, that fits in with the blasphemy or should I s...Yes, that fits in with the blasphemy or should I say heresy that these laws are meant to suppress. They try to do it with scientific research as well such as the Rind report, which is denounced in every way except making it punishable to write or possess yet. Maybe they will come after science and ideology too, or maybe they don't need to go that far because of the lockstep conformity of all the media and most publishers and platforms. The truth about minor sexuality is already relegated to the dustbin of history and the few remaining survivors... well, a recent comment on TOC poignantly sums up how we treat them:<br /><br />"A few days ago Gabriel Matzneff gave an interview to French television in Italy, where he remains in exile following the Springora case. He preferred to hide his face, but he was very affected. He was about to cry. In his own words, he is devastated. He said he regrets his past. He said that at that time no one spoke of crimes, but of corruption of minors or non-violent indecent assault. He said his love affair with Springora was the most beautiful love story of his life. He said he feels very alone. He said that the state wants him to kill himself and that now he will have to live on other people’s charity, since they are going to take away the pension he receives as a retired writer and he does not keep any fortune. Sad end to the license of French writers. Sad end to the dream of an era.<br /><br />And I don’t know if I understood correctly, but I think when he said that the state wants him to kill himself, he immediately added, “I will, I will. The interview was broadcast on BFMTV and can be seen here: https://www.pausefun.com/es/video/gabriel-matzneff-interview-sans-concession/"Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-7904645358651214072020-02-03T18:05:13.669+01:002020-02-03T18:05:13.669+01:00A fourth way to look at it, which is most accurate...<i>A fourth way to look at it, which is most accurate in my view, is that the child porn laws are actually blasphemy laws which enforce the quasi-religious belief that "children" are asexual, the myth of the innocence of the child which now has status of state religion in feminist countries".</i><br /><br />One of the real reasons why people are not allowed to see child porn is that, if they were, they would discover how sexually "un-innocent" children may be. By forbidding possession, in other words, it is easy to manipulate the public opinion by telling all sorts of shamefaced lies, knowing that nobody will be able to contradict them anyway.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-74302867333830211882020-01-30T08:33:33.233+01:002020-01-30T08:33:33.233+01:00Oh wow, sex-hostility finally ran into a limit. It...Oh wow, sex-hostility finally ran into a limit. It turns out that Kobe Bryant's death wasn't yet another good occasion to bring up "sexual assault" allegations. Instead the bitch who thought so got 10 000 negative reactions from the public so the newspaper had to suspend her, which is another good sign that they care more about reputation than feminist ideology.<br /><br />https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51279486<br /><br />But I am sure that was just a temporary blip and antisex will shortly return to growth.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-54742916443568738212020-01-28T10:52:54.330+01:002020-01-28T10:52:54.330+01:00How come our culture is able to distinguish betwee...How come our culture is able to distinguish between male and female breasts, but not penises and vaginas? The ruling that female breasts can be "lewd" even though topless men can't be is actually a good sign, if only such differences could be applied whenever appropriate. Of course any law prohibiting nudity (of both sexes) in your own home is execrable, but that is a separate question. This precedent supports my campaign against the female sex offender charade because it shows that sex differences at least sometimes can be acknowledged.<br /><br />Now we need to apply this difference to the entirety of female anatomy and sexuality and hammar home the truth that female-perpetrated sexual abuse is a wrong conceptualization with no reasonable referent in the real world. Female breasts will of course be arousing to boys, but there cannot be any harm in that and same for vaginas.<br /><br />I am really glad the topless woman failed in that particular challenge because it would have set a worse precedent if we were to instill the delusion that not only are penises and vaginas equal, but male and female breasts are as well. Now she needs to tackle the real problems with the charges, of which the lowest hanging fruit should be that no reasonable person has any problem with female lewdness, and secondarily that nudity in the home should be none of the state's business. Anyone claiming that children are damaged by just seeing nudity must also be dismissed out of hand.<br /><br />The evolution of mammals would be rather difficult if the young couldn't see nipples, lol, and why the Utah bigots aren't ashamed of themselves for their dimwittedness if nothing else is beyond me.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-66465747960622130662020-01-28T08:38:18.725+01:002020-01-28T08:38:18.725+01:00She can and should go for jury nullification in th...She can and should go for jury nullification in the trial phase. I realize that this was challenge to the constitutionality of the lewdness law on grounds of "equality" between male and female breasts before they got to the actual trial, but even there, there ought to be some way to make the point that the law is simply insane. The failure to do so is not cool. At the very fucking least, make a statement to the media with your true opinion so you don't look like an idiot. And for God's sake, campaign to have the law changed! Finally, demand a pardon which is also a no-brainer. I know Trump doesn't believe in the female sex offender charade, but the question is if he is also a slave to the system.<br /><br />The trouble with the female sex offender charade is precisely that sex laws can NOT reasonably be equal for men and women, so going for gender equality is the worst possible angle! It undermines the entire moral defense she should make. Even if you believe in making that asinine point as a first line of defense, trials take place not just in court but also in the media and rest of the political system, and they aren't trying a different approach there because they are so obsequious to antisex bigotry. Especially now that the "equality" angle has failed, what do they have to lose?Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-9047032674973638752020-01-28T04:15:37.046+01:002020-01-28T04:15:37.046+01:00that's fuckin funny using other cops' phot...that's fuckin funny using other cops' photos.<br /><br />btw the reason the lawyers didn't make a moral argument is because US law doesn't work that way. When the law is made, it's basically set in stone, and the lawyers and judges simply try to work with it. In the topless case, defense figured the best angle to try was to use other equality laws, since that is allowed by the system.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-21644800191982593482020-01-27T14:09:22.514+01:002020-01-27T14:09:22.514+01:00Wow. Check out this Twitter thread on the most dys...Wow. Check out this Twitter thread on the most dystopian kind of facial recognition already real and used even in antisex sting operations:<br /><br />https://twitter.com/kashhill/status/1218510902556811264<br /><br />And this article:<br /><br />https://www.nj.com/news/2020/01/new-jersey-cops-told-to-halt-all-use-of-controversial-facial-recognition-technology.html<br /><br />"When men sent photos to undercover officers posing as children online, investigators ran those photos in Clearview’s database to identify them."<br /><br />Could be used in reverse stings as well. Who wants to bait the cops with photos of other cops and vigilantes?Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-81435350384053973872020-01-27T12:25:23.116+01:002020-01-27T12:25:23.116+01:00Because we gotta believe women's abuse stories...Because we gotta believe women's abuse stories even after they have been convicted as false rape accusers:<br /><br />https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10825195/ayia-napa-rape-brit-reveals-torment/Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-28635540395265451272020-01-27T11:26:20.823+01:002020-01-27T11:26:20.823+01:00The Utah topless woman case is incredibly depressi...The Utah topless woman case is incredibly depressing. Not because of the hate, as we know bigots will be bigots, but the asinine defense which accepts that it is taboo to even suggest that there is anything wrong with sex-hostility. When asserting that female breasts aren't lewd because topless men aren't is the best they can come up with, it shows a level of hopelessness that I hadn't yet imagined. The female sex offender charade and all the other antisex bigotry is now so dogmatic that it is unthinkable to suggest that sexuality can be harmless, even for women and the most minuscule hint of it. I never thought we could sink this low. How hard can it be to attack the bigoted delusions themselves rather than affirm them by clinging to a technicality? Hers is the kind of defense Gally would come up with, which does more harm than good for both the cause and the victim of the sex laws who is reduced to a grovelling sycophant of the antisex bigots, giving them all they want and denying no part of their lies that sex is harmful.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-38813043651896300582020-01-27T10:02:13.277+01:002020-01-27T10:02:13.277+01:00Indeed, "marital rape" was historically ...Indeed, "marital rape" was historically never a crime (until the late 20th century) and I strongly support reinstating the marital rape exemption. However, you can see how rape by other men is a threat to marriage in ways that other violence isn't, which supports the idea that rape needs to be its own category with a more severe punishment. We can support this as long as it's reasonably defined, which means the women absolutely must resist to the best of their ability, and obviously so so the man knows it, no drunken regret-rape nonsense.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-91628908120067625672020-01-27T09:41:00.078+01:002020-01-27T09:41:00.078+01:00The pair-bonding argument obviously doesn't ap...The pair-bonding argument obviously doesn't apply to "marital rape," though. I think that no man should be penalized for forcing his wife to put out. I also doubt that drunk sluts need to have their pair-bonding faculty protected. The courts' involvement should really be minimized.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-71090424506349021662020-01-27T00:55:57.647+01:002020-01-27T00:55:57.647+01:00Utah keeps pushing the envelope of the female sex ...Utah keeps pushing the envelope of the female sex offender charade:<br /><br />https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/22/us/tilli-buchanan-topless-utah.html<br /><br /><i>On Tuesday, a Salt Lake City judge rejected a challenge to the charges by Ms. Buchanan’s lawyers, who had argued that the law, which forbids exposure of “the female breast below the top of the areola,” was unconstitutional.<br /><br />“The Court finds the government has an important interest in enacting laws to protect the health, safety, welfare, and morality of children, and to prevent them from being exposed to lewdness,” wrote Judge Kara Pettit of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County.</i><br /><br />It's hard to imagine a more absurd case, but of course they can keep increasing the sentencing which is only up to three years in this case, one for each child who saw her breasts, plus ten years on the sex offender registry.<br /><br />And what a pathetic challenge from her side, just arguing that she should be allowed to be topless when men can. How about addressing the actual absurdity of pretending female sexuality is harmful to children instead? Once again we se that neither women nor any of their lawyers have any moral fortitude. Their arguments are as silly as the law in the first place and the hateful drivel of the court.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-30484663948941114602020-01-26T15:30:59.385+01:002020-01-26T15:30:59.385+01:00"What do you call a guy who can openly celebr..."What do you call a guy who can openly celebrate his sexual relations with children in books and on TV without being prosecuted?<br /><br />A giant of French literature."<br /><br />Great post on the Matzneff affair at Heretic TOC:<br /><br />https://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/2020/01/26/licence-expires-for-french-men-of-letters/<br /><br />Also a fine summary of the AOC history and situation in France. The latest antisex reform from 2018 still falls far short of feminist standards, but I guess that is set to change once again now thanks to this latest hysteria. We are approaching a global delusion that everyone under 18 can't consent, which isn't enough either because you have to call it rape and punish accordingly.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-1086826307532112782020-01-26T12:31:36.513+01:002020-01-26T12:31:36.513+01:00If women were like chimpanzees, I would not want t...If women were like chimpanzees, I would not want to have a crime of rape. Because female chimpanzees are not selective, or so I am told; they just happily mate with whatever male is available, usually the dominant ones but she doesn’t pick them because of that. One thing I’ve realized recently is that you can’t use parental investment theory to explain the difference and why sexual selectivity is such a big deal to women, because that applies equally to chimpanzees. The difference might be that women have had more freedom to choose and thus opportunity to evolve selectivity, but most important might be the fact that they pair-bond while chimpanzees don’t. And rape can screw up a woman’s pair-bond, so it makes sense to have special rape-avoidance adaptations that make them very traumatized, hence justifying a crime of rape considered more heinous than other comparable violence. This bears some resemblance to the idea that rape is a crime against men, but since the mechanism of harm is that the woman gets traumatized, it is reasonable to consider it a crime against her. And modern society doesn't make much difference to the sexual mentality of the sexes, so we do need to be traditional about this even if society has changed.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-20887870422835018882020-01-26T11:51:11.569+01:002020-01-26T11:51:11.569+01:00The problem with feminist rape law reforms is that...The problem with feminist rape law reforms is that they've expanded the definition while keeping or increasing the punishment (plus applying it to women in the female sex offender charade is another problem). I am inclined to let them have a crime of rape considered especially heinous if we go back to the old definition. That included not just being forced, but also taking reasonable steps to prevent it before they get that far. One example is the marital rape exemption -- if they don't want marital sex, don't get married! And don't go on dates or get drunk and cry rape after going home with men either. Then all they should be able to claim is the bodily harm, which if none would make it simple assault at worst.<br /><br />But in the interest of honesty and fairness, which male sexualism should aspire to, I believe in retaining a traditional concept of rape for worthy victims. This crime cannot be gender-equal, because it obviously doesn’t apply to female perpetrators and it does acknowledge that women are especially vulnerable, which in fact they are to sexual coercion since they have so much more to lose to the opposite sex. So the modern concept of equality between the sexes must be rejected, but mostly because it is a lie: equal treatment of unequals isn't equality.<br /><br />Does this mean I want a hybrid system? I guess you can call it that, and why is that bad in recognition of real sex differences?Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-16774865093216683512020-01-26T10:19:09.522+01:002020-01-26T10:19:09.522+01:00Bodily harm can be anything between few punches in...Bodily harm can be anything between few punches in the face and pouring acid over face, latter will be probably considered as aggravated.<br />I think that average (real,forcible,penetrative)rape is somewhere in the middle between these two things.<br /><br />It is problem nowadays, to differentiate, to what degree is rape trauma affected by natural adaptation or by cultural environment. <br /><br />I may agree with you that women can possess some natural attributes, which can make their perception of various problems different than men will experience. <br />Problem is, that if we want to rely on old natural order of things and be fair,then we should also take into account specifically male issues (things that are hurting males predominantly in "natural society") <br /> <br />I personally prefer modern concept of equality between sexes over traditional one.<br />Women should accept both pro's and con's of their emancipation, not only cherry-pick what suits them, as contemporary mainstream (anglo)feminism is teaching them. <br />That is reason why I like post 68, pre victimhood-cult times. <br />Women then tried to be more "masculine", not in terms of physical appearance but by life attitude.<br /><br />Now they behave like weepy little girls who want draconian measures to prevent every slight unpleasantness they are experiencing. Living as male in contemporary society is like to be a parent of unemployed young adult who wants your protection and money, but is not obeying your rules anymore. <br />We should decide if we want traditional(patriarchal) society or a modern one, <br />but it should be coherent one, not some weird hybrid, that will later or sooner screw up everything. <br /><br />BTW: interesting article (but you've probably read that already in past) <br />https://www.spiked-online.com/2013/07/17/is-rape-really-a-fate-worse-than-death/<br />Milan Horvathhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18099730216391531671noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-86808551950707645792020-01-26T05:32:50.368+01:002020-01-26T05:32:50.368+01:00This Nassar guy is awesome! His response to the ev...This Nassar guy is awesome! His response to the evil sluts’ witch hunt:<br /><br />“Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.”<br /><br />LOL<br /><br />And wow this Aquilina attention whore cunt certainly did her best to steal the spotlight from the young hot girls attempting to whore all the attention for themselves. The nerve of the young fillys, coming to her big girl court thinking they could hog all the attention!<br /><br />I like to say there are two kinds of whores - good hearted and bad hearted. The good hearted ones uphold their end of the bargain when you give ‘em attention. The bad hearted ones break the unwritten rules and squeeze the man for every last drop regardless of the impact to the man, or very well society. Nassar obviously was surrounded by vultures young and old, in a system that specializes in delivering carrion to the beasts.<br /><br />Regarding prostitution, the right wing religious moral excuse keeps prostitution illegal and female SMV even higher. And when that isn’t enough, the right wingers just align with the left and call regular prostitution “sex trafficking” where everyone involved just goes straight to jail. America wins the most feminist Olympics.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-11214654117141851042020-01-26T05:26:20.027+01:002020-01-26T05:26:20.027+01:00No, nothing wrong, your comment is published now. ...No, nothing wrong, your comment is published now. I just didn't notice it before going to bed last night, sorry.<br /><br />I agree rape shouldn't be legal in a system with sane laws all around. Whether it should be treated as more serious than assault/bodily harm, however, is debatable and my default position is to agree that it should. Not because of any feminist arguments, and it certainly isn't murder of the soul or anything like that, but evolutionary psychology tells us women may possess adaptations that make them uniquely traumatized by rape (in order to better avoid it) because sexual selectivity is so important to them. Ironically, feminists deny the existence of any such adaptations, and if they are right about that, then rape should just be non-aggravated assault unless it is aggravated by other reasons than the sex. I need to think more about this before making up my mind for the Manifesto.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-56759444097618996882020-01-26T00:03:30.881+01:002020-01-26T00:03:30.881+01:00Why is my comment not showing? Something is not ok...Why is my comment not showing? Something is not okay with it, or it just wasn't delivered?Milan Horvathhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18099730216391531671noreply@blogger.com