tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post3165485516275123187..comments2024-03-28T10:43:26.059+01:00Comments on Eivind Berge's Blog: Yup, Elliot Rodger was a trendEivind Bergehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comBlogger108125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-32216671752018696262021-10-29T17:20:33.434+02:002021-10-29T17:20:33.434+02:00For long time i couldnt find word for myself.. `de...For long time i couldnt find word for myself.. `desperate ` `virgin` but incel i am!!<br />and why society wants us to suffer i dont know.. <br /><br />alanis morisette.. easily brainwashed.. by the loons<br /><br />kate winslet is different, she had relationship at 15 with 27 yr old, with no regrets . (except, he died)..Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10759082112622243489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-38961411394607081212021-09-18T20:23:59.719+02:002021-09-18T20:23:59.719+02:00♫ Isn't it ironic, don't you think? ♫
“I...♫ Isn't it ironic, don't you think? ♫<br /><br /><i><br />“It took me years in therapy to even admit there had been any kind of victimisation on my part,” she says. “I would always say I was consenting, and then I’d be reminded like ‘Hey, you were 15, you’re not consenting at 15.’ Now I’m like, ‘Oh yeah, they’re all paedophiles. It’s all statutory rape.’” </i> <br /><br />https://www.theguardian.com/music/2021/sep/13/alanis-morissette-says-she-was-victim-of-multiple-statutory-rapes-as-a-teenager<br /> <br />Just another spoiled showbiz princess, who cannot cope with ageing, so she is playing victim, to gain sympathy...if I had penny for everytime.......Milan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-87065501305490606502021-09-17T22:36:06.736+02:002021-09-17T22:36:06.736+02:00I agree. I will take collapse over the tyranny we ...I agree. I will take collapse over the tyranny we are on track for, even if Norway is lagging somewhat on the speech part. Glorifying crime including terrorism is not yet criminalized here (only incitement), not even pedophilia unless your speech counts as pornography. But that might change if we got any genuine pedo activists like they have in the Netherlands. Since I only advocate for teens I don't think I will trigger it myself, but if they do make any new laws they will probably use a definition of "children" up to 18 and male sexualism will be banned too.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-38466625165866440442021-09-17T16:56:51.425+02:002021-09-17T16:56:51.425+02:00Strangely I am more afraid of continuation of this...Strangely I am more afraid of continuation of this civilisation rather than end of it.<br />Frankly, if it will go the same direction as it is going now, there is not much to cry for.Milan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-21307790050954473792021-09-17T16:42:00.503+02:002021-09-17T16:42:00.503+02:00No, not straightforward causality but rising tensi...No, not straightforward causality but rising tensions mostly subconsciously, and one of the ways they manifest is in tighter control by governments if they can. Especially when the energy shortage also hits the elite, which blackouts inevitably do, and that's just the early stages of collapse.<br /><br />All the economy is driven by energy. Energy is the ability to do work, and if you don't have it you get to do the work, whether that is heating your house or producing food. Not affording works the same way as not having. No one will magically put wealth into people's hands if they can't afford energy products and the goods made with them. Governments will try, but that will drive up inflation which drives up energy prices as well until you hit this limit that strangely only Gail Tverberg is raising awareness of. There will simply be less to go around of everything until no one gets industrial products at all because they can't be made anymore, which require a whole working infrastructure. Yes, governments might even try some extremely undemocratic means, but it will break anyway as physics has the last word.<br /><br />And no, we can't go back to an earlier stage with so many people. All of that is gone to the point that it can't even support the population that existed back then. There will simply be no way to keep more than a tiny bit of the population alive.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-4706128133617623142021-09-17T15:58:04.201+02:002021-09-17T15:58:04.201+02:00I am not sure, whether there is straightforward ca...I am not sure, whether there is straightforward causality between freedom of speech and energetic safety, in case of Norway it may be however fact, that it is not fully integrated within EU structures, and it have commodities that are valuable for others (which is yes, energy) so they are not dependent on others, but others are dependent on them. <br />They have so-called upper hand, when it comes to negotiations.<br />EU, while they improved intra-European business, and travel, they have grievously damaged personal freedoms in it's member states. <br />For example, law that is criminalising apology of terrorism <br />(I've mentioned earlier) is implementation of some EU directives, law that is criminalising possession of sinister data is also implementation of EU directives<br />(although it was also enforced in other countries through propaganda)<br /><br />Only thing, by which is possible to blackmail Norway is IMO defence. <br /><br />I do not deny, there will be serious problems,maybe catastrophe,even collapse of civilisation. But I cannot grasp, how exactly we should go back to pre-industrial times. Knowledge that was gained last centuries, will be forgotten? How exactly?<br /><br />There are many solutions to shortage of energy that are not very democratic or market friendly but could work.MIlan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-69483239128888120552021-09-17T15:09:13.344+02:002021-09-17T15:09:13.344+02:00Here is a link to that:
https://www.zerohedge.com...Here is a link to that:<br /><br />https://www.zerohedge.com/commodities/fire-uk-france-subsea-power-cable-could-trigger-winter-blackouts<br /><br /><i>"If we don't start to remedy the situation, we are going to be facing blackouts this winter," Catherine Newman, chief executive officer of Limejump Ltd., a unit of Royal Dutch Shell Plc, told Bloomberg on Thursday. "If things don't start to reverse soon, we will see the industry getting turned off across the board."</i><br /><br />Europe will probably have to burn more coal this winter:<br /><br />https://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/Europe-Could-Turn-To-More-Coal-If-Gas-Crunch-Persists.html<br /><br />And perhaps that will briefly help, but if the idea was to transition away from fossil fuels it should be clear that's not happening when we can't even keep the electric grid supplied, which is just a tiny bit of all the energy needing to be replaced. We get a little bit more civilization out of coal, oil and gas (but much less than the mainstream assumes, because the market can't bear the high prices needed), and then we get collapse.<br /><br />It's amazing how long it can be denied though. At no point will humanity admit defeat to collapse and give up the "green shift" too. There will be no moment where everybody agrees it is over like General Lee surrendering at Appomattox, even though our situation is just as hopeless. He didn't have to surrender either, you know. The South could have engaged in guerrilla warfare for a long time. Which is how it will be against collapse, with first more false hopes as long as they can be kept up and some preppers holding out the longest.<br /><br />A stressed society will be less tolerant to dissenters, so this is really not a good time to be an activist for idealistic causes. But once you are famous like me, that can't be undone so I am not going anywhere until they forcibly remove all traces. It also fits the energy pattern that Norway is the most free-speech-tolerant country left in Europe now, still allowing voices like mine. We alone have plenty of oil and hydroelectric, though that is wearing thin too now with talk of possible rationing next spring:<br /><br />https://steigan.no/2021/09/na-er-stromprisen-pa-nytt-rekordniva-kan-ende-med-rasjonering/Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-50014751990958066142021-09-17T15:06:24.155+02:002021-09-17T15:06:24.155+02:00However, there are less-visible structures that ar...<i>However, there are less-visible structures that are determining public discourse, via lobby and media. It would be interesting to know more about these people.<br />Their motivation, their personal connections, financing.<br />It is probably not some homogenous group of people, rather it is convergence of interests of various groups.</i><br /><br />To amend this, I know that there are feminists, traditionalists, opportunists and so .....<br />I meant to know more unknown details about these processes.Milan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-70781573149575176712021-09-17T14:40:36.328+02:002021-09-17T14:40:36.328+02:00Interview of David Hamilton for Swiss newspaper Le...Interview of David Hamilton for Swiss newspaper Le Temps, ca. year before his death:<br /><br />https://www.letemps.ch/culture/difference-entre-david-hamilton-autres-photographes-richissimes-cest-lui-un-style<br /><br />https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.letemps.ch/culture/difference-entre-david-hamilton-autres-photographes-richissimes-cest-lui-un-style<br /><br />About year ago I listened radio interview with photographer Jan Saudek, it was interesting, but it shocked me when he told moderator, that since those murders in Belgium in 1996 <br />(case Dutroux), he do not photograph children (acts) any more, because he don't want to hold responsibility for such crimes.<br />(as photographs like this, supposedly are causing/helping this, he suggested)<br /><br />And now question. Is he so dumb/brainwashed, or coward/opportunist? Huh..... <br /><br />Don't these moral crusaders feel any shame, to use brutal sexual murders of young women and little girls, for their idiotic propaganda? <br />I think, we know the answer....<br />Milan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-83840687382660164582021-09-17T12:25:27.819+02:002021-09-17T12:25:27.819+02:00Yeah, it is horrifying. If I were starting out now...Yeah, it is horrifying. If I were starting out now, I would not have chosen to be an activist. Anyone who speaks out simply does not belong in society under current laws and will be removed. So your choice is life in prison to speak at all. And even if you accept that, there they can censor your every letter so you reach no one at all and whatever you managed to publish before you were imprisoned will be purged and criminalized as well to make sure you have no readers. We are looking at the perfect totalitarian state -- or collapse, which now looks very appealing.<br /><br />In the news today is the UK risks blackouts soon because a fire has put a cable to France out of order. That's how thin the margins are and you might think it will be fixed and more capacity added when they get around to building more windmills or whatever, but think about it: this is exactly how it looks to be living inside collapse. Every isolated problem looks fixable, but the trend is downward into darkness. That's how it must have seemed inside the collapse of Roman civilization as well, except this one will be faster because the energy needs are so much greater. First rolling blackouts then lights out for all before long -- no electric grid at all within ten years according to Gail. Every step of the way we can always find some reasons for optimism, but collapse happens nonetheless.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-88868253203149802632021-09-17T12:01:32.903+02:002021-09-17T12:01:32.903+02:00...... it's nothing new
There is narrative sp......... it's nothing new <br />There is narrative spread by various traditionalist totalitarians (aka.conservatives), that present-day gay/trans tolerance and erosion of "traditional values" will inherently result in tolerance/legalisation of sexual encounters of adults with children. Such notion is absurd, regarding fact, that society nowadays is much less tolerant of these things than it ever was in modern history.<br /><br />Politicians (or rather their marketing advisors), don't care what is true, or what is reasonable any more, they just want to gain political capital at any price. <br />However, there are less-visible structures that are determining public discourse, via lobby and media. It would be interesting to know more about these people. <br />Their motivation, their personal connections, financing. <br />It is probably not some homogenous group of people, rather it is convergence of interests of various groups. <br /><b><br />I have some suspicion that these new paedofinder laws are instrument to further protect people in abuse industry from criticism. <br />Whatever absurd demands they will have, whatever atrocities they will commit,<br />it will be even more risky to stand up against them, than it ever was. </b><br /><br />I think, that free speech activism in Europe is now needed more than ever.<br />Problem is that this issue is frequently usurped by various "patriots" who care only about certain parts of freedom of speech rather than for principle.<br /><br />Besides many new hate speech laws, there are also many "antiterrorist" laws, which ordinary people thinks are aimed towards Muslim fundamentalists, but they can be used (and are) against anybody who is out of line.<br /><br />One example is ban on face covering; it was presented as measure against Muslim women maltreatment, but in fact it is just measure that is preventing anybody from protecting his anonymity in public. <br />Also cash transfer limits, anonymous sim card ban, data retention law, KYC-AML,<br />deployment of face-recognition systems, end of anonymous bank accounts ........and many other "niceties" that will make 1984 novel look like fairy-tale.<br /><br />Even prosecutors and judges sometimes think that it is too much.<br /><br />https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=cs&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fct24.ceskatelevize.cz%2Fdomaci%2F3319094-statni-zastupci-volaji-po-zmirneni-sazby-za-schvalovani-terorismu-na-internetu<br /><br />5-15 years? For some stupid talk, without any impact on society? <br />And people have no problem with that? <br />Of course, they have no problem, they are like cattle-while you feed them, they don't mind that sometimes few of them disappear to abattoir. Milan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-25366735045821079122021-09-17T01:07:31.451+02:002021-09-17T01:07:31.451+02:00Ehm, I found this nice smiling fella
https://www....Ehm, I found this nice smiling fella <br />https://www.facebook.com/bruce.woodling<br />isn't he cute?<br /><br />Sad things is, that after all problems what these cretins caused, most of them, were able to continue their careers. Be it up to mine, best job they could find would be toilet attendant.<br /><br />Speaking of these Californian clowns, here's some old NZ men's right site, where they are describing Americanisation of CSA discourse in their country:<br />https://menz.org.nz/cosa/dsac-doctors-for-sexual-abuse-care/#Fuelling <br /><br />This is funny:<br /> <i><br />There are speaker after speaker who could be classified as the very worst of the "child savers" . One private correspondent (from America) has suggested to me, tongue in cheek, that the best thing that could happen for this congress, would be if somebody leaked information to a terrorist group that Clinton was on the same plane as that which may be bringing all these overseas "experts" to New Zealand.</i>Milan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-70083683995366847502021-09-16T22:01:44.002+02:002021-09-16T22:01:44.002+02:00Yes, we can say anything we want as long as it doe...Yes, we can say anything we want as long as it doesn't offend the "public morals," which means anything whoever is in charge wants it to mean. Good point that if something truly offends the public moral and you want to make a law out of it, then that moral should be enough to stop the law. That will be the case for real pedophilic child abuse, so there is no need to stop the speech.<br /><br />I like the idea of a movement for freedom of speech, but it won't be long before that too goes against the "public morals" at this rate.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-76072190419213767912021-09-16T21:45:11.516+02:002021-09-16T21:45:11.516+02:00There is question, why they are doing this? I mean...There is question, why they are doing this? I mean, any relaxation of sexual criminal laws is supposedly widely unpopular, so:<br />-is it some cheap populism to gain some political capital?<br />-is it some fanatics' effort?<br />-is it opening gate for other new verbal crimes?<br />-are they have to fear of something?<br /><br />Problem is, that we do not have (in Europe) protection of free speech, and since WW2 we have stupid precedent in form of holocaust/hate speech laws that are even not protecting society against such atrocities. <br />Neonazis are only gaining popularity with this , as they are getting into position of martyrs.<br /><br />I wonder how many people know how worthless are our basic documents<br /><br />as example we can look up to ECHR article 10<br /><br /><br />Freedom of expression<br />1.Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television or cinema enterprises.<br />2.The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or <b>public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals</b>, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.<br /><br />Basically it means that you have freedom of speech unless we decide opposite.<br />Credo of these new mutaweens are: Shut up and pay taxes, we will decide what is good for you. <br />Adult citizen is now reduced to little child whose only freedom of decision is whether they will have Nesquick or Kellogs' for breakfast.<br /><b><br />It is possible that we will be forced to start movement for freedom of speech as prerequisite to our cause, in future. It will be needed anyway. </b><br /><br />Even though I don't agree with hate speech laws, they still make much more sense than this.<br />Reasoning behind them is that society under some populist rule could outgrow to some genocidal atrocity as majority won't care about some ethnic minority, and this could be perpetual.<br />But in case of age of consent laws, this is different because almost everyone have children regardless of ethnicity or political views as this is way how we are reproducing.<br />There will never be interest in majority of people to knowingly accept anything that would be harmful to next generation, and if that accidentally occur it will be immediately reverted.<br /><br />That part about science was interesting.<br />When COVID pandemics started, I was arguing with my brother i.l. about objectivity of scientists. I was astonished, how naive could intelligent people be.<br />Science is now taken as religion, problem is, that scientists don't live on Mars, they are ordinary people placed within hierarchy with background ideology and various <br />financial/social/political pressures placed on them. <br /><br />BTW:<br />There was a sarcastic joke in communist Czechoslovakia: <br />Yes, we have freedom of speech, but what we lack is freedom after speech. Milan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-53140790479079442572021-09-16T19:38:03.048+02:002021-09-16T19:38:03.048+02:00I will say something to that sad news(for everyone...I will say something to that sad news(for everyone who cherish free speech) from Holland,<br />when I will breath it out. <br /><br />I am not into kids, nor I am doing this because I want to bang teenagers or so, <br />it is a principle thing for me same as many other issues as drug policy, privacy due process etc....<br /><br />geeez I am pissed off. I will not fall asleep tonight.......<br /><br />I wonder if Pim Fortuyn would allow this if he would be still alive?<br /><br />From purely practical POV I wonder if someone operating website in USA jurisdiction, will have liability to cooperate with European police forces, in case that American laws weren't breached. <br /><br />BTW: isn't freespeechtube operated in Dutch jurisdiction?Milan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-68047100494281749232021-09-16T19:00:08.875+02:002021-09-16T19:00:08.875+02:00About that petition, I don't particularly reco...About that petition, I don't particularly recommend signing on such sites, which are mostly vehicles to get you signed up for spam. But I liked the sentiment, except for the part that implied a sex abuse conspiracy on the other side, yes. I guess they just can't get away from that boogeyman. No matter where they look and from every side, the enemy is always a pedophile. But it's certainly true that social workers commit iatrogenic abuse as in your example.<br /><br />"Against her will, he examined her genitals, inserted glass tubes into her anus, and then confirmed his preconceived diagnosis of abuse."<br /><br />Yeah, no kidding they will find abuse if they make sure to create it themselves.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-63874276876804117212021-09-16T18:46:23.387+02:002021-09-16T18:46:23.387+02:00Oh. I was writing while you posted this... yes tha...Oh. I was writing while you posted this... yes that is sad reality in many European countries, and that's why I've said early, that it will be irony of fate that we could soon speak freely only in USA.<br />What is however most depressing, that it is Netherlands which another on the list.Milan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-85507577871219501922021-09-16T18:44:29.035+02:002021-09-16T18:44:29.035+02:00It is simply not a defense anymore that a statemen...It is simply not a defense anymore that a statement shouldn't be a crime because it is true, even a very well established scientific truth :(<br /><br />First the arts fell starting a few decades ago and now science. We have lost respect for the very concept that there is anything noble and free about intellectual inquiry. Laws are blunt political instruments that can crack down on scientific truthseeking as well as anything else.<br /><br />Activists must probably retreat into allegory.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-24339829737286570912021-09-16T18:40:55.752+02:002021-09-16T18:40:55.752+02:00Would you wish for your child to end up in a child...<i><br />Would you wish for your child to end up in a children's home, where they may be abused by rapists masquerading as those who "care deeply" for children? </i><br /><br />Petition may be not bad idea, and there are many rightful demands,<br />but I don't like way it's done.<br /><br />In my region, few years ago, there was big outrage about Norwegian Barnevernet<br />(besides many domestic problems with child welfare), which removed child custody from <br />CE European immigrants for dubious reasons <br />(usually, there was allegation of sexual abuse at start). <br /><br />Yet people, instead of seeing real reasons behind that <br />(abuse of generous funding,laws that are enabling this and last but not least paedohysteria) were creating various crazy conspiracy theories about child sex rings and human trafficking. <br /><br />I think, that with such ideological allies you do not even need enemies. These people are using oil as extinguisher, and then they are wondering why it is so hot there.<br /><br />BTW: How is Barnevernet perceived among ordinary Norwegians?<br /><br />Speaking about that intimate physical examinations, there was some excerpt from David Thomas' book Not guilty at theantifeminist's site in past. <br />It was something about, how girl who was sexually abused by relative was not horrified by abuse itself (as it was done in non-violent way), but instead she had trauma from intimate physical examination that was done by forensic paediatrician. I can't find it now. <br />Instead of it, I will show translated excerpt from book: <br />Uncle Sam's Sexualhölle erobert die Welt.<br /><br /><b><br />The Los Angeles practitioner Dr. Bruce Woodling, who was a specialist in sexual offences there, found "certain" signs of abuse in the children on the basis of alleged abnormalities in the anal and genital areas such as slight reddening or tiny fissures, which are actually found in all children. For example, before the investigation, Woodling revealed to one of the girls interrogated in this trial, little Tricia McCuan, that she had been abused and, when Tricia contradicted him, attacked her with the words: “This investigation will show who is right and who is who is wrong «; Against her will, he examined her genitals, inserted glass tubes into her anus, and then confirmed his preconceived diagnosis of abuse - according to a much later statement by the girl, "the worst event that has ever happened to me." In any case, there was never any medical or material evidence in this and all subsequent, similar proceedings, since all the allegations were fabricated. </b><br /><br /><br />In conclusion: isn't forceful forensic intimate physical examination, of supposed victim itself a form of abuse? This is not same as ordinary medical procedures or checkups, because they are done for medical reasons, but these are done for judicial reasons instead.Milan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-52541614531915926902021-09-16T18:27:01.545+02:002021-09-16T18:27:01.545+02:00Shocking new post at TOC about some Dutch crimes t...Shocking new post at TOC about some Dutch crimes that are, shall we say, futuristic?<br /><br />https://heretictoc.com/2021/09/15/where-prejudice-legally-trumps-truth/<br /><br />a. denying and/or downplaying the harmfulness of sexual contact between children and adults, and/or<br />b. the glorification of sexual contact between children and adults, and/or<br />c. presenting children as sex objects/sexual beings, and/or<br />d. removing barriers and supporting or nurturing the belief that sexual contact between children and adults is something good, and/or<br />e. creating a subculture/community in which sexual contact between children and adults is considered normal/acceptable/beneficial, and/or<br />f. the pursuit for oneself and/or for others of being able to have sexual contact with children<br /><br />But even more depressing is this comment by Kit about the death of free speech:<br /><br />"<i>At the same time, I wonder if we need to accept that free-speech rhetoric is no longer a strategy that commands a lot of respect these days (at least outside of the United States). This is not just the work of intolerant millennials on university campuses, even if this is where the shift is seen most obviously. Over the last two decades the bottom has largely fallen out of the free market of ideas, and the idea that speech is or should be a special and protected domain of human behaviour where anything (in principle) goes is beginning to look less and less credible to many people.<br /><br />I don’t really want to get into whether or not this is inherently a bad thing. Regardless of how undesirable it might be, I think we do need to acknowledge that there is a kind of epistemic shift going on (that is, a shift in what kinds of statements are regarded as true or even meaningful). Gone is the idea that good and true notions will always win out in the end by a sort of Darwinian (or Popperian, or Thatcherite) logic – we are now increasingly expected to exercise moral responsibility in the way we speak and in what we choose to say.<br /><br />I think this is bad news for the idea that we can simply rely on scientific discourse to tell us what is true, or even that science is better at telling us the truth than literature is. Scientific enquiry, like political speech, is no longer defended by a cordon sanitaire. So simply pointing to Rind and Gieles and saying, “this is science!” won’t cut it anymore. Scientists are revealed to be as implicated in politics and society as literary critics are. Any perusal of the pages of the august Journal of Child Sex Abuse should be enough to illustrate the problem.<br /><br />So given the shift in what is sayable, at least in many public forums, I wonder if we need to adapt our rhetoric accordingly. Rather than saying over and over again, ‘this is the objective scientific truth, and other people are wrong,’ I’d suggest we need to adopt a different strategy.</i>"Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-72617120134483783392021-09-16T16:29:18.463+02:002021-09-16T16:29:18.463+02:00This is a refreshingly forceful petition against a...This is a refreshingly forceful petition against a further expansion of the abuse industry which cheered me up as far as it goes (58 have signed it so far). Certainly changed my image of social workers (whom I hadn't really given much thought before) to predators, which seems to be a general feeling among parents now.<br /><br />https://www.change.org/p/gavin-williamson-mp-secretary-of-state-for-education-social-workers-to-be-kept-out-of-schools<br /><br /><i>We have heard that social workers are to be embedded permanently in schools in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and possibly Scotland. This represents a monumental danger to the human rights of children and families across the entire UK. Over 20% of children in primary school have been subjected to a liberty-curbing investigation of their private family lives, conducted by social workers. We also heard recently that a young girl was subjected to an intimate physical examination by a social worker, simply based on an unfounded allegation by another child. Following these investigations, some children are removed from their families forever for adoption, based simply on the "crystal ball method" of the "possibility of future emotional harm". What people do not realise is that social work and removal of children causes far more emotional and physical harm than anything else. Would you want your child to be removed forever based on some unfounded allegation? Would you want your child to be subjected to an in-school intimate physical examination by a social worker? Would you wish for your child to end up in a children's home, where they may be abused by rapists masquerading as those who "care deeply" for children? Then stop this abuse right now and sign the petition, so we can keep our schools for the purpose they are intended and focus on education.</i>Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-74058467780220746092021-09-16T15:33:44.973+02:002021-09-16T15:33:44.973+02:00It is interesting fact? that many phenomenons, whi...It is interesting fact? that many phenomenons, which about conservative busybodies<br />(and other prudish totalitarians) are complaining now, are in fact unwanted by-products of their acts in past.<br /><br />.hypernormalisation of homosexuality nowadays-as a consequence of their nasty,nasty persecution of these people in past. Without these events I doubt that homosexuals would demand things as marriage, adoptions and other "privileges" of majority. <br />There were countries where "sodomy" was either legal or considered as petty crime, and I believe that without exporting American cultural wars, there would be hardly<br />(in these countries) things as gay marriage and adoptions some issue.<br /><br />Reading through WAR ON SEX, I realised that they came to conclusion that this "busybody, war on this-war on that" society cannot be changed so easily, and only way to help themselves was to leave camp of "untouchables" and to become full members of "respected" society. <br /><b><br />Lancaster writes, “When, as the price of entry into the ‘properly<br />political sphere,’ mainstream gay rights organizations promote a hypernormal image<br />of homosexuality, maintain silence about sex offender registries and ‘child safety<br />zones,’ and . . . avoid discussions of age-of-consent laws, they reinforce a dynamic<br />that Lee Edelman has described: everyone wants to offload the burden of queerness<br />onto someone else; no one wants to be holding the stigma.”<br /></b><br /><br />.vulgar sexual culture, <br />Is IMO just product of culture, where sexuality(and nudity) is seen as something forbidden, harmful, and indecent.(dirty this,naughty that, instead of having fun, making love, enjoying etc.) <br /><br />Milan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-1191209228670302732021-09-15T22:46:50.875+02:002021-09-15T22:46:50.875+02:00I said I didn't mention collapse on TV because...I said I didn't mention collapse on TV because, yes, it would look loony to bring it up without the proper background information. If collapse happens, it will happen regardless of how loony or not I am, and I simply note its likelihood here so we can be aware of it. I have no ambition of being a prominent energy expert since I have no credentials as such. <br /><br />Anyway, this is a high-value production where they can't "put words into my mouth" that I didn't say, since that will not match the format of filming people who are talking. What they can do is edit it to distort the context, and having several hours of footage to work with I don't doubt they will do this, but there are limits and I am happy to get attention even if they do their best to make me look bad using the material they got. None of it is catastrophically bad.<br /><br />Good point about Aubrey evading apology for "underage" attraction per se, but I am still disappointed about how faintly he did it and how he is sucking up feminist norms in the workplace.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-53181250841110734942021-09-15T22:26:45.924+02:002021-09-15T22:26:45.924+02:00"The good news is the embarrassing feminist U..."The good news is the embarrassing feminist USA defeat in Afghanistan shows how incompetent the feminist regime has truly become, and therefore its influence is in decline and should not exist for much longer. Meanwhile, the more pro-male Russian and Chinese influence is on the rise. We must keep up our advocacy while the feminist beast implodes."<br /><br />I agree with Milan Horvarth regards it being a mistake to consider Russia or even China to be pro-male, or at least pro-male sexuality. Russia now has mandatory life-sentences (in some of the worst prisons in the world) for any 'sexual abuse' of a minor, and China is currently going through a MeToo hysteria. No doubt their age of consent (of 14) will be raised before long.<br /><br />I'd go further and say it's a mistake to consider 'feminism' to have been defeated in Afghanistan. If you're into 12 year old dancing boys or if you're into marrying your in-bred female cousin for life and never being able to so much as look at the uncovered skin of another female, then yeah, Afghanistan is an anti-feminist utopia. I know some 'Male Sexualists' would think so. Perhpas Eivind will move there. Only don't try to chat up any females or you might find yourself beheaded pretty quick. Not that you would be likely to find any unaccompanied females to chat up anyway.<br /><br />Feminist USA will only be replaced by a new American Conservatism, which for male sexualism is little better.<br /><br />There is no 'return to the past', and certainly not a return to the (male) sexual freedoms of the 1960's and 1970's. Women will not allow this. Society is controlled by woman and always has been. If any of you left were ever MRAs, you would understand the idea of the backseat driver. It's either Islam or puritanical American Conservatism (which is pretty much what Russia and China have in a truer form). Why is this concept so difficult to understand? <br /><br />I agree too that Eivind's obsession with collapse theories is a bit loonish, but that's the way he is. If he represents Male Sexualism, then Male Sexualism is a bit loonish. In any case, I'm pretty certain they are going to put Tom Grauer's statements into his mouth and present him as a real psycho. Eivind hasn't even got the sense to move to another platform before the shit hits the fan.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-1349949040651788082021-09-15T22:07:39.423+02:002021-09-15T22:07:39.423+02:00Aubrey de Grey at least didn't say that his em...Aubrey de Grey at least didn't say that his email to the girl was wrong because she was 17. He could even be interpreted as implicitly saying that it was not wrong (because of her age).<br /><br />If instead of trying to save billions of older people's lives, Aubrey had dismembered a woman alive, he would have been getting 17 year old girls writing to HIM and giving him sexy compliments.<br /><br />https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9993631/Denmark-bans-prisoners-relationships-girl-17-fell-love-submarine-killer-Peter-Madsen.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com