tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post4091342130330480058..comments2024-03-28T10:43:26.059+01:00Comments on Eivind Berge's Blog: The persecution of Monica YoungEivind Bergehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comBlogger56125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-11575758920731404452021-11-18T14:34:21.694+01:002021-11-18T14:34:21.694+01:00And what does Amnesty International do against thi...And what does Amnesty International do against this background?<br />They support feminists, I suppose...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-30096727936505698792021-11-18T09:51:19.170+01:002021-11-18T09:51:19.170+01:00"https://www.facebook.com/morgan.foll
Here&#..."https://www.facebook.com/morgan.foll<br /><br />Here's the wife"<br /><br />The freaky looknig wife looks quite young. I wonder how old he/she was when they started dating?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-7632879993800097102021-11-18T08:20:53.634+01:002021-11-18T08:20:53.634+01:00C/mom FreeTheTeens. So a nice young man gets put a...C/mom FreeTheTeens. So a nice young man gets put away as a sex offender for taking a video of himself having sex with his girlfriend who is two years younger. Probably got raped a few times in the showers before the prison guards throw him on to his head leaving him paralyzed for life. <br /><br />The real evil is some whore being put in a cushy women's prison for cheating on her husband while she sucks off 13 year old Tyrone, making the incel kids guard the doors in case another teacher comes by.<br /><br />And wankers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-5707204925581113942021-11-16T03:57:40.738+01:002021-11-16T03:57:40.738+01:00To refine that definition... feminism is the exces...To refine that definition... feminism is the excessive criminalization of sexuality <i>based on hyperinflated victimhood</i>. There are of course other ways to go overboard with the criminalization, and right now I am working on a post on one of those. That is leiermål, which was a bizarre Nordic way to make crimes in the 17th and 18th centuries out of what feminists now do so well with their justification (plus much more since there is no protection for sex within marriage either anymore, all of which is rape if the woman regrets it). Leiermål is so obviously sex criminalized for the hell of it that English doesn't even a word for it, since you never went that far prior to feminism. It is my hope that we can get some more people to see how evil feminism is by using a word more like "leiermål" than the "rape" and "abuse" they want us to call it. I shall propose "laycase" and if anyone has better suggestions, please tell me.<br /><br />If we systematically started referring to men like Epstein and R. Kelly as convicted of laycase -- which is literally what it is rather than the fake abuse feminists will have it -- it would be harder to demonize us. The violence might still persist though since they had it back then too when the law was honest. They even had a female sex offender charade without the charade since they called it leiermål rather than pretending women were sexual abusers, so if we get back to the honest justification, you will be spared my rants about the unique evil of the female sex offender charade. If nothing else, can society at least be more honest about its infliction of gratuitous violence against sexuality? Why do we need to put up with lies too?Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-42642891908343376272021-11-16T03:34:03.048+01:002021-11-16T03:34:03.048+01:00Sorry I've been lazy with updates, but I'm...Sorry I've been lazy with updates, but I'm working on the next post and meanwhile here is another one by Gail:<br /><br />https://ourfiniteworld.com/2021/11/10/our-fossil-fuel-energy-predicament-including-why-the-correct-story-is-rarely-told/<br /><br />The only place we get realistic information about how bad the world economic situation really is.<br /><br />And November 29th is the big day for TV, so I aim to have another post up by then too which should introduce male sexualism to newbies. Most people haven't even heard of it any more than people in antiquity had heard of the abolitionist movement against slavery, so that is a big task. They mostly dismiss antifeminists as angry losers or crazy or evil, not realizing that the only definition of feminism that is relevant to us is the excessive criminalization of sexuality. The very idea that sexuality can be excessively criminalized is just about unthinkable to the normies, so we need to think of ways to make that case in very clear terms.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-56177485320774536592021-11-08T22:17:43.517+01:002021-11-08T22:17:43.517+01:00https://www.facebook.com/morgan.foll
Here's t...https://www.facebook.com/morgan.foll<br /><br />Here's the wife<br /><br />Where are my lolita occultists? Anyone up for a black magic ritual? ;)freetheteens69noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-53200889874182869782021-11-08T21:30:40.988+01:002021-11-08T21:30:40.988+01:00The prison guard that paralyzed that 21 year old, ...The prison guard that paralyzed that 21 year old, I found his facebook lol.<br /><br />https://www.facebook.com/garrett.osbon<br /><br />And his grandmas facebook<br /><br />https://www.facebook.com/robert.kline.1428921?comment_id=Y29tbWVudDozMzE1MjQ1NDM1MjM5MzQyXzMzMTY2MDkzNDUxMDI5NTE%3D<br /><br />I think I'll let his grandma know what a piece of shit he is<br /><br /><br />freetheteens69noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-27629091192791596022021-11-07T12:49:52.374+01:002021-11-07T12:49:52.374+01:00Female sex offenders are bogeywomen, because femin...Female sex offenders are bogeywomen, because feminists told us we gotta have bogey-equality. It is a remarkable accomplishment to make them scary. That requires suppression of all reasonable comments from the mainstream on a level that only a well-oiled high-tech propaganda machine can achieve. Most impressive are the show trials that we pretend not to be for show and ritual. Putting a mythological creature on trial must necessarily be a meaningless ritual, but those rituals serve a purpose, I realize now. Only the most dimwitted buffoons think that purpose is “justice,” or to “protect” boys from female sexuality, but there is a purpose I have been missing -- that of group cohesion. The thing about rituals is they must be presented as some kind of truth. When a sacrificial victim such as Monica Young is put on display by the high priests and media of our culture, they can’t literally admit what they are doing, because then the ritual wouldn’t work.<br /><br />I, too, have some experience with rituals and have felt their power. I used to love communion as a kid, a fine way for Christians to bond. When a feminist court says “this woman is a sexual abuser,” they mean it at the same level that we drink the blood of Jesus in church. It would be out of place to point out it’s not literally true. If you want to belong to the group, you better go along with its meaningless rituals, and that’s how feminism does female sex offenders. It would all be good fun like the Eucharist if they didn’t hurt real people, but that harm is worth it to the group. Only because I am an outcast or pathologically morally sensitive do I feel differently.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-86517505555268577462021-11-07T11:44:21.017+01:002021-11-07T11:44:21.017+01:00Good video, thanks. I was not familiar with mass f...Good video, thanks. I was not familiar with mass formation. An interesting concept that may well explain some things. I would not have guessed that people felt more anxiety before the pandemic and less during all the lockdowns and other excessive measures because their "loose" anxiety found an outlet. I wonder where they will direct it next. Sex offenders are always a suitable target, and they didn't seem to get much less of if during covid either, but it could have been worse. Hopefully there will be more distractions soon until collapse deals feminism its deathblow.<br /><br />What he said about role of rituals is also very interesting. The more meaningless the ritual, the better it works to foster group cohesion. The female sex offender charade is the ultimate meaningless ritual, and what he said about accepting meaningless punishment as sacrifice also finds its ultimate expression in this. Yes, the same mechanism that made Russians accept Stalin's purges can plausibly also be carried so far as the female sex offender charade; I can believe that. Because people are so keen to belong to the feminist state with all its deranged ideology and superstitions, they do not protest its absurdity or injustice. And then mass formation can focus their spare anxiety on the new-found boogeyman which now also includes women.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-20663821203617912842021-11-07T02:07:37.906+01:002021-11-07T02:07:37.906+01:00That Ugo Bardi’s blog is interesting. Someone post...That Ugo Bardi’s blog is interesting. Someone posted this video in discussion. <br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLDpZ8daIVM<br />I think it is interesting debate about mass formation, unfortunately very long.<br />It is primarily about COVID measures but I think it could be applied on other issues.<br /><br />Regarding that case of GBH committed against inmate, I am appalled that there were no criminal charges pressed against guards. <br />I am observing in my region, that there is now much more tolerance towards police violence and abuse, when compared with early post-revolutionary years. <br />People think that violence could be used towards "inadaptable" citizens to establish an order.<br />"If you behave properly you shouldn't be worried about it"<br />I am sincerely hoping that "uncle Niemöller" is waiting for such people.<br /><br />It should be no surprise that media and culture are playing big role in this .<br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copaganda<br />It is shame that this phenomenon is being noticed only because of American identity/racial wars.<br /><br />Milan Horvathnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-39673772580897200562021-11-06T21:06:05.052+01:002021-11-06T21:06:05.052+01:00Ugo Bardi’s latest blog post is about the impossib...Ugo Bardi’s latest blog post is about the impossibility of stopping a propaganda state before it collapses.<br /><br />https://thesenecaeffect.blogspot.com/2021/11/the-propaganda-trap-how-to-get-out-of-it.html<br /><br />“<i>Is there any hope to stop the evil machine? It looks difficult, even impossible. <b>So far, propaganda has been stopped only by the complete collapse of the governments that created it</b>, as it happened in Italy and in Germany. Are there better ways? Maybe. Propaganda has been with us for more than a century: it has changed, it has morphed into different forms. But one thing remains central: propaganda exists because there exists a centralized control of the information flow in society (we call it the "media"). As long as this control exists, propaganda will remain with us, all-powerful as it is.<br /><br />But, right now, the Internet has created a gigantic system of information flow that escapes central control -- so far, at least. As long as we can bypass the media we are immune (within limits) from propaganda. Otherwise, <b>the only way to get rid of it is collapse.</b></i>”<br /><br />We can indeed be thankful for the Internet, without which you wouldn’t even be reading this, but it isn’t helping against the sex war. Notice how the antisex propaganda is just as pervasive as Nazi methods of control. Even though feminism is “only” about sexuality and does not encompass all other areas of society plus quite as much imperialism as the Nazis did, our rulers certainly don’t tolerate any alternative sexual activity and very little alternative speech. The sex laws are backed by absolute violence and all the mainstream media are in lockstep agreement with feminism.<br /><br />It was new to me what the Nazis did to the White Rose group, which Ugo says did not upset the Germans all that much, because they were as heavily propagandized as we are against sex offenders:<br /><br />https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Rose<br /><br />“<i>The White Rose (German: Weiße Rose) was a non-violent, intellectual resistance group in Nazi Germany led by a group of students from the University of Munich, including Sophie Scholl, Hans Scholl and Alexander Schmorell. The group conducted an anonymous leaflet and graffiti campaign that called for active opposition to the Nazi regime. Their activities started in Munich on 27 June 1942, and ended with the arrest of the core group by the Gestapo on 18 February 1943. They, as well as other members and supporters of the group who carried on distributing the pamphlets, faced show trials by the Nazi People's Court (Volksgerichtshof), and many of them were sentenced to death or imprisonment.<br /><br />Hans and Sophie Scholl, as well as Christoph Probst were executed by guillotine four days after their arrest, on 22 February 1943. During the trial, Sophie interrupted the judge multiple times. No defendants were given any opportunity to speak.</i>”<br /><br />That is pretty much what the sex war is coming to as well. In the Netherlands they already have everything but the guillotine. Sadly it does not look like such a machine can be stopped without destroying the whole state, unless people somehow magically embrace alternative views found on the Internet. But what do they actually do here? Well, the vast majority, if they stray from state propaganda at all, simply seek out alternative ways to promote the same War on Sex with added conspiratorial flavor such as QAnon, which more than outweighs any kind of sexualist movement.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-21987529677177802362021-11-06T13:41:27.503+01:002021-11-06T13:41:27.503+01:00I can’t get past the institutionalized hatred that...I can’t get past the institutionalized hatred that is revealed by the case of the paralyzed sex offender. It shows so clearly that being a sadistic monster to male sexuality is <b>the norm</b>. Unlimited cruelty for anything to do with sex is most often celebrated and at worst tolerated with no further consequences. Getting just as much money you need for lifelong disability is hardly consequences -- why no criminal charges!? When someone can admit <b>this</b> and not be changed with a crime...<br /><br /><i>"the dude I broke his nose is now paralyzed with a broken neck, and they say his face looks like he had been dropped and dragged through concrete, LMAO... It feels good to know that I played a small part in paralyzing a cho, LMAO... we also water boarded him LMAO... I broke a dudes nose today, yeah this was not reported, there was way too much blood so I mopped it up."</i><br /><br />The evidence is right there in the psycho feminist’s own words just as credible as the digital evidence they routinely use to charge harmless men for sexting or image possession, so when they don’t give a damn it is unmistakable that the prosecutor is in on it and the whole system is evil. When the victim is still defined as a “child sex offender” who surely deserved all that simply because he made a consensual video with his 16-year-old girlfriend, you know the system hates men with a malice that won’t go away with any sort of deliberation. They know what they are doing and fully intend to continue. What kind of value system can possibly justify criminal charges for a victimless sex crime twice removed from reality but NOT the brutal, crippling torture of a helpless prisoner, because the sex is somehow inexplicably, metaphysically so bad that he loses all human rights -- literally everything except the burden of health care that society still grudgingly bears for these nonpersons who have received the sex offender label? These are literally the values that society holds. Feminism is the most horrifying ideology that has ever existed, not because it is most evil in terms of the tortures it will inflict but because it targets a group with no ability to fight back. It exploits men’s (and a select few women’s) inability to resist the redefinition of our sexuality (plus symbolic extras as are employed here) into abuse. When other groups are redefined into Untermenschen or whatever, they know to fight back. They may not always be successful, but they have warriors. Men as a group and normal heterosexual people in general simply do nothing to resist the redefinition of our sexuality into criminality, so there is no hope until this civilization itself burns out.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-3333693007132329312021-11-06T00:14:33.734+01:002021-11-06T00:14:33.734+01:00And meet these psychos who enforce the same cultur...And meet these psychos who enforce the same cultural norms Norwegian style...<br /><br />https://www.nettavisen.no/nyheter/bruker-fritiden-pa-sexchatting-for-a-avslore-voksne-overgripere/s/12-95-3423844597<br /><br />A bit more subdued, but just as evil...Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-24827445637013301082021-11-05T23:57:54.204+01:002021-11-05T23:57:54.204+01:00What’s so scary is they are actually enforcing cul...What’s so scary is they are actually enforcing cultural norms. That’s why they boast, because they have reason to according to those norms. That the quadriplegic got compensated is a fluke; mostly they get away with it and did here too without any criminal charges. Notice the complete irrelevance of the emptiness of the “crime” they avenged: even the news article says “convicted child sex offender” because the label is the only thing that matters and you get it for anything sex-related at all. It doesn’t matter that there were neither children nor sex involved: it is the belief in the metaphysical badness of sex that counts. In the feminist way, with its invention of the fiction of the “minor” which equals “child,” and then all the symbolic ways “children” are damaged by sexuality up to and including the pure blasphemy of stating the contrary. The first violation of this taboo no matter how minuscule leads to infinite damnation, and if the laws haven’t caught up yet then vigilantes must do the job.<br /><br />Notice how this man who got horribly tortured and crippled is never once referred to as a victim. He is introduced as a “convicted child sex offender” even though his conviction bears no relation to anything of the kind and if you read between the lines you get the impression that the real tragedy is the state has to pay him. Meanwhile, the first association with sex automatically makes all girls “victims” in the media.<br /><br />Of course, the normies who back these norms hate their own sexuality too because they are no different, but that doesn’t stop them either. Feminism is so successful that it has turned humanity on itself for our sexuality. We cannot tolerate ourselves but must persecute the sexuality out of us, which will never succeed, so you get these travesties as long as civilization has the energy to conduct them. It really does make something like the Irish Potato Famine look welcome:<br /><br />https://thesenecaeffect.blogspot.com/2021/10/the-great-dying-ireland-as-distant.html<br /><br />And luckily it is near too:<br /><br />https://thesenecaeffect.blogspot.com/2021/10/the-age-of-exterminations-vi-great.html<br /><br />See, it’s not just Gail saying that anymore. Ugo Bardi is there openly talking about exterminations in our near future, whether by famine or more direct means. Gail was the most extreme of the old Oil Drum crew, but the others get more like her every day because it turns out she was most right.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-48994056586218827912021-11-05T20:27:17.400+01:002021-11-05T20:27:17.400+01:00I see. This is the torture they boasted:
“After h...I see. This is the torture they boasted:<br /><br />“<i>After handcuffing him and escorting him to the medical clinic, the guards claimed he tried to pull away from them en route; when Corrections Officer Christopher Coy failed to leg sweep him, he tackled Fletcher to the ground.<br /><br />Fletcher told them his neck hurt and he couldn't move his legs, so they picked him up, face down, and carried him the rest of the way. The nurse deemed he was okay and sent him back to the segregation unit.<br /><br />Still handcuffed and face down, the guards carried him by his arms and legs, dropping him a number of times on his face on the way back, before leaving him on a bed in a suicide watch cell, his arms hanging limply over the side. Cameras along the route were reportedly inoperable that day.<br /><br />Unable to drink himself, he asked for water; guards poured some on his face, some of it going up his nose.<br /><br />The acting captain checked on him around 2:30 AM and was told by Fletcher he couldn't move, but no action was taken. It wasn't until a psychologist visited his cell shortly before 10 AM that medical help was summoned. He was taken to Ohio State Wexner Medical Center to undergo emergency spinal surgery; but Fletcher had been left quadriplegic.</i>”<br /><br />For this “crime”:<br /><br />“<i>Fletcher had been serving a two year sentence for pandering sexually-oriented material involving minors. His defense team claim the offense involved a consensual video the then-18-year-old made with a girlfriend a couple of years his junior.</i>”<br /><br />This is how much society hates normal male sexuality, gentlemen. It is no accident, but done fully deliberately because the normies truly believe in feminism. We can only hate back, and probably not a good idea to be captured alive by such a system, certainly in the US, which is in a class of its own of antisex bigotry and cruelty even for the ostensibly lightest sentences. Indeed it seems more humane to get the usual lifetime imprisonment there so the guards don’t feel so impelled to make it worse.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-45699400838259568632021-11-05T20:04:47.642+01:002021-11-05T20:04:47.642+01:00Another episode of the series: "This is Ameri...Another episode of the series: "This is Amerika":<br /><br />https://toofab.com/2021/11/03/ohio-to-pay-17-5m-to-convicted-child-sex-offender-after-prison-guards-boasted-about-paralyzing-him/<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-38434882335802650352021-11-05T16:02:40.739+01:002021-11-05T16:02:40.739+01:00For the purposes of trolling and activism by whate...For the purposes of trolling and activism by whatever publicity we can get, I agree there should be a sexualist DAO. Go for it if you have the skills; just don’t confuse that blockchain with serious crypto, which is only Bitcoin. Suppose a sexualist DAO got famous with the news screaming that Ethereum is used to promote what the mainstream considers sexual abuse. Would they hardfork like they did in 2016 when the original DAO didn’t go to plan? It would anyway be lots of fun for us, but given the strength of feminism there is a good chance the entire network would reject us, and unlike with Bitcoin they can really do it too because Ethereum is not truly censorship-resistant money.<br /><br />Or do you run a full Ethereum node yourself like we can easily do with Bitcoin? Last I tried that five or six years ago it was already unwieldy, with blocks coming in every 14 seconds or so. Back then I actually solo-mined blocks and unfortunately sold all my eth for something like 10 dollars apiece. Of course I should have hung onto them until now they are $4500, but I still don’t believe in it. Perhaps it has a role for big centralized finance, but it’s not the people’s money because users can’t enforce the consensus rules when it’s impractical to run a full node at home. Now they are even going to shard into 64 blockchains and apparently scale so big that I don’t see how it can fit in a typical PC. By all means troll that crap, but don’t buy into the ethos because it has no ethos that is agreeable to us or any freedom-loving people. They said “code is law” and then hardforked anyway when they didn’t like a DAO, so what’s to stop them from doing it again? The only place that matters where code is really law is Bitcoin, and you are the master of that code when you compile and run your own node, which is not just some lofty ideal but eminently practical to do. That way users can veto hard forks and even activate soft forks against miners’ will if need be, whereas with Ethereum you are at the mercy of whatever Vitalik decides.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-70523501920722345962021-11-05T04:24:33.084+01:002021-11-05T04:24:33.084+01:00"As to DAOs and DeFi (aside from perhaps indi..."As to DAOs and DeFi (aside from perhaps individual opportunities to make money), none of that will help sexualism any more than other “sex cults” that also get prosecuted."<br /><br />Incorrect. DAOs are unstoppable because they are minted on the blockchain - they cannot be removed no matter how you attack them, which is the whole point, they are permissionless. And if it's built with already existing privacy tech like cryptonote, it will get massive support because it will be anonymous.<br /><br />Imagine launching a DAO that has reducing the age of consent of sex and porn as its stated goals burned into the blockchain, and rewards users who troll online like Holocaust22 with lolitacoin. People would buy in and it would be a huge success.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-84546638695935440152021-11-04T17:10:56.458+01:002021-11-04T17:10:56.458+01:00My bad, I should not have called masturbation “saf...My bad, I should not have called masturbation “safe” even with scare quotes. That shows I am still not entirely immune to the brainwashing myself either! Masturbation is actually an extreme health hazard, because the impotence it often leads to is a serious health problem, up there with cancer and HIV. Men certainly should rationally fear impotence more than all other STDs, so unless you are in the midst of an AIDS epidemic and gay, masturbation is actually the MOST DANGEROUS “sexual” activity! The only reason why it’s not seen that way is because the feminists have succeeded in brainwashing men to devalue their sexuality. Think about that! Let it sink in how fucked up and misandrist it is to call something which entails an extreme risk of erectile dysfunction “safe”! That’s like calling the most extreme kinds of female genital mutilation safe, or even worse because men also get fertility problems in addition to the loss of sexual enjoyment and wankers fail to develop proper sexual relationships!Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-31092768727995923512021-11-04T16:40:21.155+01:002021-11-04T16:40:21.155+01:00Obviously an antisex-bigoted government is going t...Obviously an antisex-bigoted government is going to propagandize for masturbation and try to pass it off as a “sexual” activity; what could be more feminist than that? And yes, it is “safe” to stay away from sex, but then you also miss out on the meaning of life. What a cruel irony that many men actually internalize these lies exactly as the government intends and think they are getting sexual value out of suppressing their sexuality, and then on yet another level of persecution get further preyed on by feminist “sex” laws for this too if they masturbate to unapproved fantasies, all while being told and believing that it is women who are oppressed!Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-24612290217870601302021-11-04T16:17:32.645+01:002021-11-04T16:17:32.645+01:00"Of all sexual activities, masturbation is th..."Of all sexual activities, masturbation is the safest":<br /><br />https://www.health.qld.gov.au/news-events/news/give-yourself-a-hand-the-health-benefits-of-masturbation?fbclid=IwAR0BGIdoih-mOEBGcRtsaZU1GP82ApoKncnjsPSbpGJh_-EBKY7lc2KvfDwAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-2726480747837186642021-11-03T19:42:42.971+01:002021-11-03T19:42:42.971+01:00Porn culture? You mean OnlyFans and otherwise sell...Porn culture? You mean OnlyFans and otherwise selling nudes? A whole bunch of exploitation of men. Porn culture teaches girls that they can get paid for “sex work” without the sex. Sure, some girls who start out that way also end up having sex, but it would be better for men if we never gave them that lucrative alternative. All statistics show men had more sex before “porn culture.”<br /><br />Also, what makes you think you are only missing out on sex with middle-aged women? That's a false, limiting, rationalizing belief because your mind is warped by porn. I myself never hooked up with anyone older than 22 on Tinder.<br /><br />As to DAOs and DeFi (aside from perhaps individual opportunities to make money), none of that will help sexualism any more than other “sex cults” that also get prosecuted. We need to face the fact that we are enemies of the state and there is zero tolerance for alternative ideas of sexual freedom, no matter how we package it. Also, I believe altcoins are a passing fad much like AOL was to the Internet. Bitcoin is the future of crypto, the protocol for digital scarcity, and anything worthwhile must be built on top of it rather than Ethereum (although the latter is admittedly strong right now -- I just don’t think it will last).<br /><br />Male sexualism is a great name for our movement with no change required. A terse, no-nonsense way to say we are on the side of sexuality. Not porn or masturbation, but real sexuality. You are welcome to run a blog promoting a more inclusive definition, however, and frankly I don't see what's holding you back. I think the “incel terrorist” scare is over for now so you won't be sucked into that kind of crackdown. The worst that will happen is vigilante trolls attack us like just happened to me, but the cops already dropped that nonsense, the details of which will write up when I get around to it so we can have a good laugh. The more they cry wolf, the more difficult it gets to frame us, so I’m actually glad they went so far as to make false accusations to the police this time.Eivind Bergehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04899250633318059069noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-60171707457743958422021-11-03T18:30:44.360+01:002021-11-03T18:30:44.360+01:00Evind, what about the argument that porn helps tur...Evind, what about the argument that porn helps turn young women into sluts (I mean 'porn culture')?<br /><br />For evey young male porn addict who is turned off chasing 'real' women, there is probably at least one prim young woman who becomes a slut (due to 'porn culture'). So really, porn likely doesn't 'reduce sexual opportunities for men'. And in any case, why the F should I care about a small number of male losers who do develop a real porn addiction and end up preferring any sex with women?<br /><br />See, that's the thing with you and Holocaust22. Everything is black and white. Nobody is saying that porn should be a replacement for women, but if men prefer to look at hot pics of HB10 women than chase 40 year old landwhales, that's fair enough. I'm not 'asexual' if I don't spend all day chasing plain janes who would mostly reject me anyway, and prefer just to fap off now and again or see a prostitute. You don't understand the meaning of the word. Asexual means 'without sexual attraction'.<br /><br />Oh and I've never said that women should be jailed for having sex with 17 year olds. What I object to is you and Eivind obsessing over the right of sluts to fuck little chads in class while they force the incels to guard the doors for them, while at the same time claiming that men who have sex with 17 year old girls without their father's consent are 'predators' and 'ruining the girl's marriage prospects' etc. <br /><br />This is supposed to be a men's rights movement, not a whores rights movement.Domnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-82474654833558975622021-11-03T18:20:22.025+01:002021-11-03T18:20:22.025+01:00@freetheteens69
But even without a name change? W...@freetheteens69<br /><br />But even without a name change? What about the 'TheFeministAntiAmericanCoservative'? Or maybe 'TheAntiFapper'?<br /><br />'FreeBritneyZamora'? What about 'SimpsForTheRightOfWomenToFuckYoungChadsWhileWeGetAnallyRapedInPrison'? I like that one.<br /><br />Look, another example of feminists being our friends. 'Beauty Is Diversity'.<br /><br />https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-59149035Domnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26678806.post-21555658286821099422021-11-03T14:37:40.436+01:002021-11-03T14:37:40.436+01:00@dom kraurer.
Who cares about fapping, and all o...@dom kraurer. <br /><br />Who cares about fapping, and all of this other stuff. Just bring your blog back up, so I can link it all over the internet when I'm trolling. Talk about the AoC, and drop the brown people/fapping/women should be imprisoned for having 17 year old bfs stuff. The only thing that matters is hot 13 year olds. <br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tq_hMGx7l_Efreetheteens69noreply@blogger.com