Is there a way out of the hedonic treadmill? Oh, yes there is! Most normies don’t take it, but there is. The way to get sublime pleasure is to seek what you are “not supposed to have.” 30 years ago, if I had gotten a girlfriend she would have been expected to be so young and beautiful and if I had also gotten used to her I am afraid I could have been that ungrateful bastard. As a rule the girls prefer the ungrateful bastards to a much older man who would worship them, to be sure, but this blog is about being the exception to the rule. If you are reading this, you don’t want to be a normie. To the normies I am a bottom feeder, but there is a fine line between being a bottom feeder and getting the most exquisite luxury beyond what billionaires usually have access to. You just need to think outside the box and flip those numbers like this beautiful Filipina explains:
Not that I would think about dating 48-64-year-old women, but I am almost the age where not much better would be realistic here. Even if I were to become “successful.” A weird thing about this culture is that while women use their success to avoid age gaps, men rarely use their success to seek out age gaps. Even at the very top with men like Jeff Bezos who just married a granny. Well, to each his own. To me it is the most gigantic no-brainer that if there is a way to change those numbers to 18-24, I must devote myself fully to attaining it.
The expats are the greatest sexualist geniuses -- if you define sexualism as not just opposing the sex laws but seeking the best possible sex life for themselves. At the educative track I am on now with becoming proficient at coding and getting a job in approximately one year I should be able to begin living that life two years from now, at least once a year as a tourist at first. So that’s what I shall do!
Great news Eivind.
ReplyDelete"Women use their success to avoid age gaps"
ReplyDeleteTo avoid the unhappy fate they suffered in the past of being married away to men they didn't choose and didn't love (who were indeed often older), sure... but there are many young women out there who are attracted to older men. I would put money on a middle-aged man still having a better chance of sex with a legal teen or young woman now under feminism, than in some conservative patriarchy with shotgun-toting dads hell-bent to protect their daughters' "purity"! It's like you've pointed out - interested parties can be found, if you just dare defy the social norms!
I wanted to ask you about the upcoming election in Norway. Every party is obviously horrible when it comes to sexuality. FrP wants no affirmative consent law, but on the other hand they want a sex offender registry, chemical castration, mandatory IP storage for ISPs, and much harsher punishments!
From what I can gather, Venstre appears to be the least bad among them. Despite the affirmative consent law, they are at least explicitly pro-online anonymity and against digital surveillance, against harsher punishments, and pro-legalizing prostitution. What are your thoughts here? Sure, they all suffer from the same blind spots when it comes to sexuality, but I figure it is best to vote for the least bad one than to not vote at all! Unless of course, you believe in accelerationism...
Obviously, this is not the only topic I'm basing my vote on. But some like FrP are so outright hateful and draconian when it comes to anti-sex hysteria (better to institute a surveillance state and to start mutilating "deviants" than to risk your poor, innocent little teenage babies sexting with an adult online!) that I could never vote for them no matter how much else of their platform I might agree with!
In the first couple of elections after I turned 18, I did actually vote FrP. Now I see they are completely fascist and sex-hostile of course, so I feel stupid but they were also not quite so bad back then (no one was). This was in Carl I. Hagen's heyday in the 1990s and he seemed like a decent guy, almost on par with Tor Erling Staff as a freedom-loving tolerant type.
DeleteI believe the right to a jury is more fundamental to democracy than voting, so that's the bare minimum of a platform I could vote for. I agree Venstre is least bad but it seems even they have given up juries now, so I feel extreme distaste to voting at all. Rationally just in terms of "least bad" I should vote for them, but it feels so wrong to participate in a system which has lost the plot completely. Everything rots and must eventually be replaced rather than fixed, and this is where I think we are with the Norwegian government now. Since we lost the jury in 2018 I have become an anarchist who does not lend any legitimacy to the courts at least, and that means I can't really support the rest of the government either unless they strive to restore the jury.
I guess the only battleground left which is not already decided in favor of fascism and extreme sex-hostility is whether we can be (relatively) free on the Internet or have age segregation and identification to access as much as a Wikipedia article. It's great that Venstre wants to preserve this freedom, but not enough to outweigh all the other acceptance of tyranny for me, so I probably won't vote at all.
A coding job can be done from anywhere so you could become a digital nomad working from abroad. However, beware of the "2 years from now" trap. If you can work a menial (crappy) job you should do so and start now. Your purpose (saving money for sex travel) would make it bearable as long as you stay focused. Of course not everyone can do any crappy job. As an example, I myself would never have been able to work as a waiter, but I could've drudged as a check-in employee at the airport.
ReplyDeleteA menial job is not an option with this program. It leads to a well-paid job or nothing. I probably won't be able to be a digital nomad right away, but will have good opportunity to save up for vacations as there is no reason to have a more expensive lifestyle here than I do now.
Delete