Saturday, April 17, 2021

The persecution of Jessica Mihalovits

Take a look at the list of accused "sex offenders" in this news story: https://newspunch.com/arizona-cops-bust-massive-pedophile-ring-as-part-of-operation-broken-hearts/

Where others see another name on a list of targets we are accustomed to the police state putting out, I see a monumental step in the evolution of evil. Whereas previously women have only been entrapped under the "vice" paradigm of antisex bigotry for which no feminism is needed, or at most the "trafficking" that feminists have upgraded it to, this is the first time I have seen a successful entrapment of a woman because the persecutors are ostensibly protecting children from sexuality and hence doing it under the "victim" paradigm. I am not positively sure it is a woman, just going by the name, so forgive me if it is a transsexual or boy named Jessica, but what I am about to say applies to the point in history when women are also subjected to this kind of evil. It may have started a little earlier or later than this, but can't be far away the way things are going now.

Her name is Jessica Mihalovits:

"Jessica Mihalovits, 39, Mesa: Aggravated Luring of a Minor for Sexual Exploitation and Attempted Sex Conduct with a Minor."

"It’s like fishing. You put the bait out; the fish will come," Phoenix Police Commander Jim Gallagher told reporters after that sting ended.

Yes, that's what we are used to for men, and men are so worthless that nobody cares anymore, but we should not let this monster get away with pretending it's just another day in the feminist police state when they employ the same evil methodology against women. We should all be appalled at this escalation and women should be concerned for their safety. The female catch is 1 out of 34 (about 3%) here, but nothing prevents them form ramping this up because all conceptual barriers have been broken down.

And notice the Orwellian name of the crime here as lying monsters lure you into incriminating yourself for "luring a [fake] minor." Once you have accepted entrapment as a valid police method, there is a temptation for everyone. It's just a matter of exploiting your biggest weakness. Since they have so little intrinsic interest in it, the most viable way to entrap women into attempted sex with a minor is to offer money for it, which for all I know is what the pigs have done here already.

Using entrapment, it is just a matter of resources to have whatever level of crime and punishment is politically expedient, all while pretending it is "justice" at work rather than an outright holocaust. Only the delusional belief that sex is the greatest evil prevents cops from using this method for all other crimes as well. They get away with it because the culture doesn't protest, because no principles of justice are demanded for "sex crimes," with no limit to the triviality or absurdity or fakery involved to thus construe them. For now, we who see this antisex bigotry for what it is can only chronicle the evolution of evil. Nothing will change any time soon except for the worse, and my hope for this post is simply that historians will have something contemporary to look back on that wasn't as deranged as the rest of the culture when they write the history of feminist antisex persecutions and particularly the female sex offender charade. I am not sure if we have such sources for other historical witch-hunts -- someone who didn't go along with the mass-psychosis at the time it was ongoing -- and would appreciate if readers could point me to sources if there is a precedent for what I am doing.

210 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 210 of 210
Eivind Berge said...

So there are two possibilities. Either the feminists are delusional like the wankers who think they are getting sexual value from porn, or they are more against the idea of sex and sexual fantasies than sex itself. I am open to debate on which one of these carry more weight, and if it is the latter, that means means our activism needs to be somewhat modified like I am already doing with nofap and my refusal to include porn laws in our concept of antisexual persecution per se. It means the feminists are less ideological enemies than we thought, if they are able to comprehend that they aren't actually battling sex by all the anti-porn persecution and still think it worthwhile.

Anonymous said...

This may explain why they went on to criminalize non-in-person child sexual abuse: to keep statistics on abuse high and thus find a pretext for further criminalization...

Eivind Berge said...

Yes, that is definitely a big part of it. If they admitted that child sexual abuse is actually declining, in part because men are so busy masturbating to all the easily available porn on the Internet, it would be hard to justify ever more laws and funding for the abuse industry. So they needed to invent a new category of abuse and pretend it's real. But at the end of the day, is it possible to debate ideas on their merit? I realize that none of the professional feminists will go against their employer, but it is bizarre how unquestioned the dogma is that all this wanking and "grooming" that leads to nothing more counts as real abuse. The conformity is just staggering and it feels so empty and meaningless when no intellectual honesty can be found anywhere on the subject except these occasional scholarly publications that make no difference to the politics.

Eivind Berge said...

"The story of the great witch hunts of the 16th and 17th centuries remains a mystery in many respects. What caused this folly to take hold of the minds of the Europeans? And what caused that folly to abate? It turns out that evil has a natural cycle of growth and decline. It is possible to accelerate the decline of a killer meme if good people get together in rejecting it."

An inspirational quote from Ugo Bardi. The good people are now us, the male sexualists. Well worth reading:

https://thesenecaeffect.blogspot.com/2021/05/memes-that-kill-cycle-of-witch-burning.html

As exterminations go, the war on witches was not the worst on record. In Europe, it caused about 50 thousand victims over a little more than a century. But it was so shockingly cruel in targeting mostly helpless women that it is remembered to this day as a form of collective madness. With us, the expression "witch hunt" is even proverbial.

Then they targeted helpless women and now with the female sex offender charade they target women who are not only helpless but also the sexually nicest and most generous.

Let us come together and accelerate the decline of the killer meme that women can be sexual abusers. Indeed this is what I have been doing for twenty years no, but let us continue. If the reason for hunting witches now as then is stress release, however, it is not looking good during times of collapse.

The extermination of the European witches generated plenty of studies in modern times, mostly concentrated on the causes of the phenomenon. Explanations are many but, in general, it is agreed that it was related to the stress generated by the Reformation and the associated wars. Apparently, torturing and killing women was a form of stress release. The human mind must have plenty of serious problems, evidently, but this much we know not just because of witch hunting.

Anonymous said...

It is no coincidence that the steady decrease of "in person child sexual abuse" (aka banging hot young teens) is exactly what the jealous old hags and their jealous men want, and they are achieving it through widespread cultural change. Porn is ubiquitous, and by constantly handing out draconian sentences for pictures of under 18 naked girls, they change the cultural attitudes in real life as well. Devious.

Anonymous said...

The real danger of Catholic law is not that the church itself has any punishment systems like the inquisition of olden times, but that Catholics are in political office and other authority positions and they'll make policy based on Catholic law.

Anonymous said...

This happens under the first Jesuit pope. Remember there's a Jesuit on both sides of every conflict, which could be a hint as to why conservative states are adopting feminist looking rules.

Eivind Berge said...

Sorry, I don't get what you mean by "there's a Jesuit on both sides of every conflict."

Anonymous said...

First of all, Jessica is a woman. Second of all, this is unlike her. Third of all, I highly suspect that she fell victim to sextortion, which typically happens to children, but in this case she was either pressured by her boyfriend at the time or an unknown course through social media (very creepy and sadistic boyfriend). Possibly blackmailed into doing something that normally most would understand is illegal, which leads me to think some kind of sextortion from a undercover cop or someone else. Jessica is not evil. She made a very big mistake without understanding what she was doing and didn't have the proper mental capacity to make a good decision and now she is paying for it. Her life is being risked every day in prison because she didn't understand how to say no or walk away from sextortion. People don't know the whole story. And they definitely don't know Jessica.

Eivind Berge said...

Thanks for your comment. Yes, I suspected something like that... sextortion or other trickery by law enforcement, and the whole this is a scam anyway as it was a sting. She is a victim of an evil system and the witch-hunt of our times. And unlike most men she wasn't even motivated by her own sex drive. It is so insane on so many levels and totally surreal that this is reality, that there is no grown-up in any position of authority who can put and end to this kind of persecution in general or at least will pardon her.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 210 of 210   Newer› Newest»