Is there a way out of the hedonic treadmill? Oh, yes there is! Most normies don’t take it, but there is. The way to get sublime pleasure is to seek what you are “not supposed to have.” 30 years ago, if I had gotten a girlfriend she would have been expected to be so young and beautiful and if I had also gotten used to her I am afraid I could have been that ungrateful bastard. As a rule the girls prefer the ungrateful bastards to a much older man who would worship them, to be sure, but this blog is about being the exception to the rule. If you are reading this, you don’t want to be a normie. To the normies I am a bottom feeder, but there is a fine line between being a bottom feeder and getting the most exquisite luxury beyond what billionaires usually have access to. You just need to think outside the box and flip those numbers like this beautiful Filipina explains:
Not that I would think about dating 48-64-year-old women, but I am almost the age where not much better would be realistic here. Even if I were to become “successful.” A weird thing about this culture is that while women use their success to avoid age gaps, men rarely use their success to seek out age gaps. Even at the very top with men like Jeff Bezos who just married a granny. Well, to each his own. To me it is the most gigantic no-brainer that if there is a way to change those numbers to 18-24, I must devote myself fully to attaining it.
The expats are the greatest sexualist geniuses -- if you define sexualism as not just opposing the sex laws but seeking the best possible sex life for themselves. At the educative track I am on now with becoming proficient at coding and getting a job in approximately one year I should be able to begin living that life two years from now, at least once a year as a tourist at first. So that’s what I shall do!
43 comments:
Great news Eivind.
"Women use their success to avoid age gaps"
To avoid the unhappy fate they suffered in the past of being married away to men they didn't choose and didn't love (who were indeed often older), sure... but there are many young women out there who are attracted to older men. I would put money on a middle-aged man still having a better chance of sex with a legal teen or young woman now under feminism, than in some conservative patriarchy with shotgun-toting dads hell-bent to protect their daughters' "purity"! It's like you've pointed out - interested parties can be found, if you just dare defy the social norms!
I wanted to ask you about the upcoming election in Norway. Every party is obviously horrible when it comes to sexuality. FrP wants no affirmative consent law, but on the other hand they want a sex offender registry, chemical castration, mandatory IP storage for ISPs, and much harsher punishments!
From what I can gather, Venstre appears to be the least bad among them. Despite the affirmative consent law, they are at least explicitly pro-online anonymity and against digital surveillance, against harsher punishments, and pro-legalizing prostitution. What are your thoughts here? Sure, they all suffer from the same blind spots when it comes to sexuality, but I figure it is best to vote for the least bad one than to not vote at all! Unless of course, you believe in accelerationism...
Obviously, this is not the only topic I'm basing my vote on. But some like FrP are so outright hateful and draconian when it comes to anti-sex hysteria (better to institute a surveillance state and to start mutilating "deviants" than to risk your poor, innocent little teenage babies sexting with an adult online!) that I could never vote for them no matter how much else of their platform I might agree with!
In the first couple of elections after I turned 18, I did actually vote FrP. Now I see they are completely fascist and sex-hostile of course, so I feel stupid but they were also not quite so bad back then (no one was). This was in Carl I. Hagen's heyday in the 1990s and he seemed like a decent guy, almost on par with Tor Erling Staff as a freedom-loving tolerant type.
I believe the right to a jury is more fundamental to democracy than voting, so that's the bare minimum of a platform I could vote for. I agree Venstre is least bad but it seems even they have given up juries now, so I feel extreme distaste to voting at all. Rationally just in terms of "least bad" I should vote for them, but it feels so wrong to participate in a system which has lost the plot completely. Everything rots and must eventually be replaced rather than fixed, and this is where I think we are with the Norwegian government now. Since we lost the jury in 2018 I have become an anarchist who does not lend any legitimacy to the courts at least, and that means I can't really support the rest of the government either unless they strive to restore the jury.
I guess the only battleground left which is not already decided in favor of fascism and extreme sex-hostility is whether we can be (relatively) free on the Internet or have age segregation and identification to access as much as a Wikipedia article. It's great that Venstre wants to preserve this freedom, but not enough to outweigh all the other acceptance of tyranny for me, so I probably won't vote at all.
A coding job can be done from anywhere so you could become a digital nomad working from abroad. However, beware of the "2 years from now" trap. If you can work a menial (crappy) job you should do so and start now. Your purpose (saving money for sex travel) would make it bearable as long as you stay focused. Of course not everyone can do any crappy job. As an example, I myself would never have been able to work as a waiter, but I could've drudged as a check-in employee at the airport.
A menial job is not an option with this program. It leads to a well-paid job or nothing. I probably won't be able to be a digital nomad right away, but will have good opportunity to save up for vacations as there is no reason to have a more expensive lifestyle here than I do now.
Not many comments lately. I guess my blog has gotten too boring, and discussion has somewhat moved to the Antifeminist. That's okay. I need to focus on improving my life as noted. Blogging is a dead end to that and I wasn't having any success at building a movement. I'm glad I tried the MAP priority approach too but it didn't make much difference from just calling myself an MRA and sexualist. I am not going away, but I am okay with less activity here and happy to devote myself more to potentially fruitful pursuits.
Though I might as well post these-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNTyQbRU2nw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9K1G2X6Mxs .
These videos look at the evidence offered up from mainstream media and Epstein "victims" themselves and finds it laughable.
There's a lot more to them than this, and not everyone will be interested in what this is, but simply from an MRA perspective, it's a relief to see.
-Anonymous 2
Thanks, Anonymous 2. I don't have time to watch right now but that sounds promising. The whole Epstein circus is built on such a flimsy delusion that I will be more surprised if it endures than crumbles. The normies should realize that they have been duped not only by fake victimhood but extremely successful scams and deranged conspiracy theories.
I watched the videos that Anonymous 2 posted, and they are totally worthless and no one should waste their time watching such garbage. It is about Epstein(AGAIN!) and it dont have any interest whatsoever.
Epstein was an idiot for killing himself. He could have been the guy telling the world that he did absolutely nothing wrong and nothing that any other man would not want to do.
So, as I said I’m rather busy but now on the bus home I have time to collect some thoughts. Today the other students at coding class were discussing age gaps -- a conversation I, I think wisely, stayed out of. If one were to glean values from how the women were talking about it, anything more than two years would practically be the moral equivalent of genocide. I was not too shocked to hear this from a 35-year-old at this point, who was by far most vocal about it, but then the youngest girl present -- 22 years old -- couldn't agree more and weighed in that to her, 18 and 19-year-olds are children. She was referring especially to the girls, who “literally look like children” to her and are “awfully immature” and so on. And though it stopped just short of the teenage brain myth this time, I was amazed that there is something for everyone to virtue-signal about in this moral panic.
Personally I think 13-year-old girls look like adults. Some 12-year-olds do too. And I believe I am right in every relevant respect.
How did the “norm” get so mistaken? We as a society have come to mistake nubility for childhood and men have failed to protest. The explosion in attractiveness which is the flower of youth and arguably peaks in the mid teens is misclassified as childhood. By the time men are old enough to even appreciate nubility (as opposed to taking youth for granted because they are so young too as in my anecdote above), we are way “too old” for any nubile girl.
The other men present did not voice disagreement either, but they were at least not enthusiastic about denouncing age gaps. Perhaps they were thinking like me that there is no point in arguing this at the micro level, in small groups. That’s just pissing in the wind; social norms will be what they are. I do present my opinion here for anyone who cares to read it, but I am done arguing where it could get in the way of other things I am doing and most importantly I intend to buck the trend through action, which is what really matters of course.
A 22-year-old girl can be a nine out of 10, but the scale is exponential and she would have been 10 times hotter at 16 or 15 (I repeat, this is and used to be acknowledged as nubility rather than men being nonces for thinking so). A 35-year-old can be a 6/10 if she is lucky, and again the scale is exponential. I guess both of them screeching so loudly about the badness of hooking up with teens makes some sense from a STU perspective, but they genuinely believe these are self-evident norms rather than ulterior motives, which is to say we can’t explain it without cultural drift as well.
And then as if that’s not enough I’m sure most of you have seen this girl waving an axe and a knife against a “sex predator” who didn't even touch any girl:
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10233947012191968&set=a.10203459839151696
Little Miss Braveheart - the wee Scots lassie whose valiant defence of herself and her little sister from an immigrant sex predator both inspires and shames a nation…
Or as I would put it: a signpost of sexuality hysterically afraid of sexuality at the same time while all the native agecucked “men” cheer her on (I do understand their jealousy though, if they can’t have her then immigrants shouldn’t either). What an icon of our times. I don’t have to look for these examples of stunning sex-hostility. They find me while I’m just trying to concentrate on coding or whatever and couldn’t have been more illustrative if I had put my wildest imagination to it. The story of our times writes itself and there is nothing we can do about it, except hopefully geomaxing still works?
I can’t wait to get out of here. This place has nothing more to offer me now. But I am haunted by the thought that this is simply what an efficient mating market looks like, and that markets don’t stay inefficient for long. When everyone gets what they deserve, perhaps we converge on a norm of max two years age gap globally. The expats rely on arbitrage, and how long can that last until other forces have evened out the inefficiency? If not true efficiency then feminist taboos preventing us from buying a better deal than we “deserve,” which will be defined as sex crimes of course.
I know I am exaggerating because virtue signaling is different from what people do in private. Some young women and even teens might still like me here too but the hate we would get in public ensures she would turn around in shame before we reach the first date (literally happened on Tinder already; they first agree but then think about how it would look). So I need to go somewhere where a 20 to 30+ year age gap is considered acceptable, if such a place still exists by the time I have the money.
Here the only exceptions at this rate of age gap hysteria will be incest and teachers and sports coaches and youth pastors, since they are the only ones who get proximity to youth. And of course all of them face heightened criminalization as well to cancel out the benefits. Whenever there is an opportunity there are opposite forces to ensure you can’t win for long. When feminism rules no one shall have benefits, everything shall be efficient and max two years age gap is acceptable.
Which reminds me of the sexualist religion I am starting: in my church we can all be youth pastors, which shall the standard clergy designation :)
Another bus ride in very slow traffic out of Bergen today, another opportunity to jot down some philosophical thoughts about age gap.
Look around you. The mating market is frighteningly effective at pairing everyone up with someone of equal value or the lack of it. This is assortative mating, which is almost entirely about age, you realize when you get older. In theory men should have a significantly longer shelf-life, but you wouldn't guess so by lookig at the couples around here. By the time men are 45 or 50 the only option is an equally sexually worthless old hag. Old couples also use the language of romantic love to describe their relationship, but it's not the same thing. This is so obvious it used to be written in children's science books when I was in grade school. They stay together mostly out of inertia and other kinds of love which has little to do with sex. And even this is not an option if you are old and single, because how the hell are you supposed to FORM a bond with someone unattractive? Sticking together when you have no better option is one thing, but there won't be a spark to forge a relationship if you didn't meet when there was attraction. Of course, 50% of couples also split up in middle age even if they had that.
If there is an inefficiency in the market, well, you have to be truly exceptional to find it, at least statistically. The men who travel from here to find a loophole in the norm that unattractive "attracts" unattractive are not said to be particularly exceptional other than by choice. I hope this is true and am fully planning to join them, but it does look a bit too good to be true from this depressing vantage point.
I wonder how the normies avoid getting depressed about it?
If I had to guess, perhaps they don't really avoid getting depressed about never getting to make love to a beautiful girl for the last couple of decades of their vital life, but they "value" other things than sex much more highly than us sexualists, such as career and hobbies. And of course many of them do have families that they want to keep together as well even if their partner is unattractive, so when we don't have that it become much more of a no-brainer to seek a better deal by any resources we can throw at it. It's still perplexing that so relatively few men give it a try though.
I'm not so much worried mysefl about the dating market than I am about the whore-mongering market, but the same observations are valid. The market has become very efficient worldwide. Thirty years ago dozens of countries were genuine pussy havens, nowadays only countries with either poor flight connections or a poor safety and infrastructure offer good opportunities. Girls in black Africa now go online even if it means they eat only 3 days a week, and they fantasize about and chat with handsome males their age.
I'm not even talking about the market within the confines of a particular country. Such a national market has always been very efficient, with the price of sex being linked to minimal wage, standard of living and cost of accomodation.
I just took out a premium membership on a well-known dating app while in Europe, with a view to my fortcoming trips to Indonesia and Peru. I started getting hits from women in Europe straight away. Women over 50, not a single one doable. I can't blame them for trying. They don't understand my hobby consists in spending as much time as I can in countries where I can poke women half my age in exchange for money. Life (with a capital L) is a rotten deal for sure.
I can also write in the mornings on what is also a school bus and thus much more pleasant. Now I shall look on the bright side.
Anthony M. Ludovici's essay "Sexual jealousy and civilization" impressed me mightily the first time I read it, and it only gets more poignantly apt as I get older. It is preserved at the MRA Archive for new readers:
https://eivindbergesblog.mra-archive.com/Sexualjealousyandcivilization.html
I saw a YouTuber describe Ludovici as a galaxy-sized brain. That was in a different context and it doesn't exactly take a genius to realize that older men can't get young women. It's more like a fish-recognizing-water situation, but weirder because the old men have been young, yet they seem to adapt eerily well to their apartheid from attractive women now complete with agecucked CSA-hoaxed feminist "morality" and all.
Anyway, in Ludovici's mind the remedy for an efficient mating market is an efficient war. We almost got that with Ukraine, but they are doing it wrong since they spare young men under 25 and send men our age to die. I am unsure if this analogue to the agecucked norms is coincidental or another expression of feminism.
Ludovici pulls the rug out from under all attempts to shame us to get with the agecucked program up to and including demolishing Christianity as another expression of sexual jealousy which dumb normies took the wrong way.
"Indeed, if we closely scrutinize this myth of an omnipotent deity choosing the cruel death of his only son in order to effect an end susceptible of achievement by any number of other means, it is hardly possible not to infer that there must be high probability for any theory which postulates the existence, from the very dawn of human history and even before that, of a deep and shamefully repressed jealousy of the young, on the part of the older male, and that its root is sexual."
There is no salvation in the story of Jesus -- what there is that we can appreciate as sexualists is commiseration from a God who knows what sexual jealousy feels like. What an absolutely dreary state the Christian "heaven" would be anyway, to be old and asexual forever?
The Christian God cannot offer salvation. To find salvation, you must believe in reincarnation, and be young again. It was always thus, never anything beyond. Youth and renewal is the meaning of life and if the Buddhists are right then we already have it.
Yeah, there comes a point when you realize you are too old to be loved by anyone attractive and it has to be transactional from here. That does not mean female validation is zero, by the way. It depends on what kind of paid girl. With a street hooker it's virtually zero but a teenage sugar baby who isn't seeing many other men feels almost like having her as a girlfriend. And of course a wife and family can also be transactional so it's not out of reach.
As Jack is saying we have to be willing to go to unsafe and inaccessible places and there too most girls have higher expectations and the means to access them. But it's still a no-brainer to try when you have nothing left to lose.
Your mileage may vary when this point comes. Robert Lindsay claims teen girls are still falling in love with him in his 60s. I found my early 40s were great for dating teens, better than any age previously, but in my late 40s it's difficult to get any kind of interest from a young woman at all. That might partly be due to circumstances which I can still change, so I stay focused on that.
First of all, Jesus was never against heterosexual sex of any type, and his death was to wipe away sins, all this feminist sexual restriction in Christianity appeared after the church was invaded by homosexuals who implemented the "chastity" vow among priests. Before that, heterosexual priests regularly went to prostitutes, and they were obviously angry about the rule change.
Next, I can't believe I have to repeat this, but a man can be attractive to a girl at virtually any age because the nature of female attraction to a man is not the same as the nature of male attraction to a female. Females are attracted to dominance, whether that is shown through money, charisma, good looks, violence, confidence, wisdom, etc. If you are a 40+ year old man who is jealous of a pimple faced male teen, you are doing alot of things wrong. It is difficult to get interest from a young woman at all in the Anglosphere right now due to the extreme radical feminist pedohysteria and social norms being propagated through social media. A woman is predisposed to go with the flow, and anything anti-male heterosexuality is the flow right now.
anon69
Perhaps it takes a galaxy-sized intellect like Anthony M. Ludovici to admit that we middle-aged men indeed are jealous of the pimple-faced teenagers. His essay was the Manosphere of 1949 and we could have just skipped this latter pathetic attempt and gone straight back to the source of pure honesty. If it weren’t taboo to admit it, then perhaps we could start doing something about it, like ditching all the agecuckery which favors the teen boys for starters, if not sending them to the trenches in a WWI type of war like Ludovici dreams of.
Dude was a homo, a sadist who enjoyed banging people he was jealous of up the ass, his opinion is irrelevant here. It doesn't take a galaxy-sized brain to see that.
Again, why would you be jealous of a teen male if you are an accomplished man? He has nothing on you when it comes to getting women besides unnatural feminist sex laws preventing you from competition.
anon69
Don't you think there is a deficit of male sexual jealousy towards the young (at least expressed; they might still feel it inside) when the normie consensus is in favor of Romeo and Juliet clauses?
Given that the interests of teenage boys and feminist hags align in both theory and practice as the boys enjoy exemptions from some of the sex laws, older men's jealousy of the boys could be a gateway drug into antifeminism. This is why I am convinced there is too little of this kind of jealousy and it should be nurtured rather than denied (which is what the normies do all day long in their agecucked virtue signaling).
And why do you think Ludovici was a homo? That's irrelevant to the point he is making even if partially true, which I have never heard elsewhere.
John Michael Greer started blogging about the Situationist movement, which is a kind of Marxism (and art movement) which existed from 1957 to 1972:
https://www.ecosophia.net/situationism-a-voice-from-the-fringes/
It’s been a long time since I heard of a movement which resonates so much with me -- not since I heard about the MAPs I guess. This is how Wikipedia describes their ideology:
Essential to situationist theory was the concept of the spectacle, a unified critique of advanced capitalism of which a primary concern was the progressively increasing tendency towards the expression and mediation of social relations through images. The situationists believed that the shift from individual expression through directly lived experiences, or the first-hand fulfillment of authentic desires, to individual expression by proxy through the exchange or consumption of commodities, or passive second-hand alienation, inflicted significant and far-reaching damage to the quality of human life for both individuals and society. Another important concept of situationist theory was the primary means of counteracting the spectacle; the construction of situations, moments of life deliberately constructed for the purpose of reawakening and pursuing authentic desires, experiencing the feeling of life and adventure, and the liberation of everyday life.
Isn’t this exactly what we are about? I could not have written a better definition of nofap, and almost not of the entire MAP and sexualist movements. Damn right, the construction of situations, moments of life deliberately constructed for the purpose of reawakening and pursuing authentic desires is exactly what we need! Only the part about us resisting the sex laws is unstated here but that follows as well if we take it into our context. I never thought I would be a Marxist but if the Situationists were around today, I think I would join them.
They were almost as fringe as we are, but I think we can learn from them. Looking forward to the rest of JMG’s series of blog posts about the Situationists.
By the way, I am proud to be an alpha-sexualist and not a beta-sexualist in Greer’s terminology. (The beta-sexualists are people like the AF who swear they would never break a law.) Greer does label the Situationists as beta-Marxists, but what else could they do? Start a revolution with five people?
Even so, despite calling myself alpha and thus rubbing shoulders with the likes of Nathan Larson and Amos Yee, I think Greer also hit the nail on the head as to why most of us open and proud sexualists are not killed or imprisoned for very long by the government unless we literally ask for it like Nathan and Amos did:
Of course Marxism is far from the only ideology that fills some version of this same role. Every complex society has an assortment of dissident belief systems, and these form a penumbra of alternative options out on the fringes of the culture. Some complex societies object to this state of affairs and try to get rid of the dissident fringe through one means or another, with recurring bouts of mass murder a common option. Modern industrial society, having learned a few things from history, takes a different tack and tacitly permits the fringe ideologies to exist and even thrive while overtly discouraging membership in them.
There are good reasons for this tolerance. Partly, campaigns of extermination are costly in terms of resources, and they also give a glamor to dissident groups that their own beliefs and actions do not always deserve. What today’s beta-Marxists resentfully call “repressive tolerance”—that is, allowing fringe ideologies to flourish unmolested while using propaganda and other means of controlling popular opinion to limit public interest in them—is much more economical and even more effective as a means of repression.
I am currently being “repressively tolerated” and could use some more glamor, lol.
We need less pictures and more situations. That’s the gist of situationist philosophy. Count me in!
I have not yet read any Situationist books or articles. If they never said anything about porn being harmful, then that’s okay because porn was hardly a problem yet in 1972 when they disbanded.
After seeing the rise of home video, the Internet and now AI, a whole lot more real-life situations, sexual and otherwise, are replaced with images and other fakery since the Situationists threw in the towel. They would no doubt think their ideology is more relevant than ever in 2025 if they were still around. We need to get back to real situations! And why not construct them deliberately? And why not have a movement demanding real situations? What matters is that they be real situations! Situationism is practically a synonym for sexualism!
Situationists, structuralists, I remember Richard Dawkins lumping them under "francophonyism". I don't think they will have much to do with sexualism. Much to do with waffle. By the way, you are wrong in assuming a picture or a film of a woman being fucked (porn) is a fakery replacing the real thing. If there were no pic or film, you wouldn't be aware said woman exists. There would be no "real thing" as far as you were concerned. She would be non-existent for you. The filming and the circulation of the film gives you something you wouldn't get if the film hadn't been made, whether you're interested in it or not (obviously you aren't).
If you have no chance of getting a woman, you are better off paying no attention to her. Porn detracts from paying attention to the females you might have a shot at.
The concept of opportunity cost is apparently incredibly difficult to grasp in this context, but it is the main problem with porn and masturbation. Life is too short to waste on such non-situations, instead of the situations which count; hence Situationism is a genius movement expressing just what I have been trying to convey all these years.
'Jack' still fighting for his porn I see. 'Jack', 'The AF' and other notorious porn users should hit the gym, quit masturbation, earn some money and get some confidence. This is a no fap blog, and all I read here in the comments is about 'Jack' and others who just want to masturbate to porn like if their life is dependent on it. Djeeezus!
'Jack' should see a prostitute once a month or once every two months instead of being hellbent on using porn and masturbation as he obviously is now. The satisfaction will be much greater and it will grow him as a person. And to grow as a human seems to bee a dire necessity for him at this point. Not even trying to get laid(outside of dating apps) and now not even hoping to get laid is just not how people in the sexualist movement should behave.
I don’t want to sound rude, but aren’t you Akemidragonnix on AF’s blog or the guy that asked Eivind to try out Substack? Some of the wording is kinda familiar. If I’m wrong, let me know.
no, Akemi is me Feldmarschall, although it was only a temporary account, since I didn't know if he was going to publish my comments if he knew it's me, just now I was going to write to AF that how can one of his favorite movies be a garbage pro-abortion propaganda, but I guess if they put a 13 year old girl fucking like a whore to justify and present the "doctors" as heroes it is irresistible to AF, I don't blame him for clinging to that in this state of affairs, I'm just stating that that supposed sex positive filmmaker would not see you in a favorable light, he would to throw you into a mass grave for your attraction for 13 year old girls.
and I always comment with a name, Feldmarschall or something like that, I am not this other person, although I share his repulsion towards porn, as I have said these years I am completely against using prostitutes and in general sex or relationships with adult women except for very few exceptions.
Elivind, tell me more about the sexualist religion you are doing, I have been thinking about doing one for years but I have never been able to, there could be 2 religions at the same time, one that would be the Sexualist one, based on your sex positive ideas and structured like a Protestant or Lutheran church with pastors and an "Adolescentist" one based on my ideas of only love teenage girls, and structured like Catholicism with bishops and a council of cardinals, which is how I would do it, but the 2 religions would be in friendship and agree on some points: there is a supreme being and the existence of the soul, being a man and having male sexuality is good, and feminists and agecucks are the enemy of everything good and moral.
What a piece of hate AF has dedicated to me on his blog, totally vile and unnecessary, I do NOT insult Jack or anyone, much less from anonymity, don't you see it's someone else? I had just come to comment and visit here again because I saw by chance that AF had reopened his blog and I was excited to have him back since he is one of my references, another thing is that I criticize certain things in his opinions, I have not even said anything against him for doing things that seem wrong to me like being a consumer of porn and paid sex, on the other hand this is disgusting to receive this hatred and accusations of being an aberrant sick person because I have a different opinion about my sexual identity. It is very disgusting and I am disappointed. I do not want to be a normal "hetereosexual" man, problem?
Ok, not to mention their complacent attitude towards the Palestinian massacre and their ass-kissing of Israel just because Muslims and the leftists who denounce it are a bunch of puritanical retards, as if the two were mutually exclusive. Anyone who kills children and teenage girls is a son of a bitch, a mortal enemy of ours who deserves hell, no matter who does it. Besides, Israel is shit to us. These morons raised years ago the marriage age from 17 to 18 because "it was an aberration for children to get married." I don't know what's is the good thing about them.
Feldmarschall asked how my sexualist religion is coming along. To be honest I have been neglecting it except trying to learn some occultism from John Michael Greer. Looking back at past comments I see this is as far as I got:
Ordo Templi Sexualis is my working title. The Order of the Temple of Sexuality. I truly believe sex is a way to commune with the divine. I think if the divine is anything then it is consciousness, and the strongest way to experience consciousness is sexuality. Particularly with a young partner, especially if you are older yourself.
I was thinking organizing it more along the lines of a more or less secret fraternity like the Freemasons with independent local chapters than a unified structure with bishops and cardinals, I guess closer to a Lutheran church the way you describe it but with more of an occult flavor. I am thinking there should be secret rituals, lore and vows for the initiates and we shall cultivate networking with other sex-positive people and focus on jury-nullification of the sex laws as a first order of practical activism.
So, let's build on this or if you want to start a different sex-positive religion that's fine too; we can be allies.
No, I'm not Akemidragonnix.
BTW what is the address for AF's blog and the post where he shows hate?
Feldmarschall, why are you against using prostitutes?
The only thing I still agree 100% with AF is how disgusting paedohypocrite men are, look at this pathetic agecuck, be careful if you admit that a 17 year old woman is attractive an envious old hag will make a bad face in a tiktok video for you! haha
https://x.com/maddenifico/status/1964470984528052237
Hi anon, its because I only consider sex within a stable partner to be healthy and morally correct to one and society, and also I am against using prostitution because is only possible (legally, of course) with legal adults and having sex with adults out of obligation is a form of rape of the feminist system, but well I agree that feminists hate prostitution because it takes away their SMV and I am also totally against criminalizing men and women for having sex with teenagers even if it is just casual sex.
Here is the hateful comment by AF against Feldmarschall:
https://theantifeminist.com/september-2025-news/comment-page-1/#comment-642562
He says in part: "But Feldmarshal is an ‘ephebophibile’ who thinks they are the next sexual minority that the feminists and queers will adopt after trannies, so he can only blame American Conservatives.... ‘Ephebophiles’ are even more mentally ill than trannies. Poor things. And at least trannies can see that feminists who want them in mass graves are not their friends."
So, the AF is very fixated on the fact that ephebophiles are normal and not a sexual minority or disorder, which is true of course, but then he thinks they are mentally ill anyway for thinking they are special? Hmmm, doesn't that make them right to begin with?
Anyway, I have a better idea. Ephebophiles are not mentally ill but rather RELIGIOUS. They have seen the light and belong to the Ordo Templi Sexualis (OTS). If like me you've been with an ephebo girl (that is, aged 13-17) while being significantly older yourself (because otherwise you don't have a frame of reference to know how divine she is) then you can be forgiven for thinking you are special, but it's not a special sexual orientation but rather a religion in the making like I am working on.
What I have experienced is the AF gets mad when anyone blames men instead of girls. The AF hates women and girls. The worst pedocrites are men. Just look at the so called pedohunters; All of them are men.
Thank's Eivind. I will look at that now.
Oh now I see; The AF thinks I'm someone else because I "insult" 'Jack'. I'm only giving out health advise as in dont masturbate to porn and dont look at porn at all. Try your luck with a girl instead and if that dont one should visit someone from the "oldest profession". And no, I have never written anything on The AFs comments section or even read his blog before.
https://incels.is/threads/in-my-high-school-a-33-year-old-male-teacher-had-his-life-ruined-for-sleeping-with-a-17-year-old-12th-grader.788394/
If this injustice doesn't piss someone off, it's because they don't have blood in their veins. We live in the most insane and evil era in history. It doesn't matter that we have long treatises on human dignity and human rights and a very high life expectancy. No just this injustice.. even then a bunch of freaks with rainbow flags and progressives come out, spreading vile lies about a supposed sexual freedom !? and "love is love." No, this is a madhouse, and on top of that, they consider us sick for being free.
At least all the comments on the thread are good. The incels is the only rationale place on the internet it seems! I wonder when Ofcom (aka the UK government and their Online Safety Act) will try to go after them?
If men are no fool, they will be refraining from embarking on any teaching career. They may have been doing so already, judging by the moaning about the shortage of "male figures" in schools.
I'm an ephebophile. An ephebophile to the stratospheric level. Ephebophilia personified. And there's nothing wrong with that. Ephebophilia saves adult male and teen girl lives; it's natural, just another instinct. Why are you so afraid of that word AF?
Truth nuke: The entire human species, except for the ephebophiles (and MAP people) you hate so much, considers a 16-year-old a literal child, and you a child molester who only deserves hatred and punishment. Fuck normal straight men. Cope with that.
Well, I tried to provide a more sensible view of ephebophilia as religiosity rather than a separate sexual orientation. Everyone with the normative sexual orientation can appreciate ephebo girls. Psychiatrists agree too and don't want to diagnose you with anything. Ephebophilia is just heightened appreciation for what we all like. Unlike the AF I don't feel threatened by your identity politics, however. I just don't promote it that way.
I wouldn't say all of humanity considers 16-year-olds "literal children" who are "molested" when they have sex, but yeah, it is getting frighteningly close. The more opposition there is to this trend the better, whether they want to call themselves ephebophiles or whatever.
As for me, I prefer the term sexualist. And I want to start a religion where we do cultivate sexuality as the greatest pathway to religious experiences. I believe what you call ephebophilia comes with built-in religious experiences for so many of us that we just need to label it as religious to have a religion. And of course we don't want our religion to be criminalized. We need some kind of organization to further this interest, probably best built as a secret society given that so few want to commit publicly yet.
Post a Comment