But it doesn't matter what the facts are, does it? Judging by all the hysterical men (yes, they are nearly all men) who after debating Michael Tracey and conceding these are the facts persist in their belief that the current witch-hunt is justified, I have given up thinking facts are relevant, which makes sense when you consider that this is a classical witch-hunt.
Witch-hunts are not exaggerations. It's not like we look back on historical accused witches and concede that they were a little bit witchy by today's standards too. No, in hindsight witch-hunts are complete and utter nonsense and the Epstein hysteria is no exception. There is literally nothing to it. Epstein did nothing that should have any relevance outside the egregiously draconian Florida jurisdiction in the early 2000s, and his friends did nothing at all.
You can also tell this is a witch-hunt by how it taints all his friends as equally bad witches and compare it to how association with anyone else with come kind of criminal conviction fails to have this effect. I have never seen anything like it for the worst criminals and now we are talking about an offense at the very flimsiest basis, relating to a girl one day under 18. It is absurd.
And now even I managed to get cancelled for my opinions in support of Epstein. It's no big deal for me as I never really had any positions worth a damn, but now I am preemptively cancelled from getting an unpaid internship because potential employers googled me and read my latest blog posts. So the path out of poverty which I mentioned about a year ago is now unavailable. I have learned a lot as I completed the classroom education part of the Kodehode program with no issue. Apparently I am too boring in person to google, so no one there noticed I have politically incorrect opinions, but when potential employers do background checks they find my blog and get hysterical, which made Kodehode hysterical too and so they kicked me out.
On the plus side I did learn a lot which will be beneficial even if I can't get a job. And now I have more time for creative expression such as blogging and coding my own projects. But I need to get back to the drawing board on how to get out of poverty and welcome suggestions to that effect.
117 comments:
You can console yourself with the fact that Amos Lee is in an even worse situation than you, but as usual he takes it philosophically without giving up his ideals and his fight.
https://www.amosyee.org/final-words.html
https://www.amosyee.org/die.html
https://www.amosyee.org/fearless.html
Thanks for sharing updates from Amos. I have to agree my life is idyllic compared to his with merely being hated and poor while he’s in addition doing serious time and now facing three more years in Singapore. For something as banal as refusing military service, but then his “sex crime” conviction for flirting with a teenage girl was even more banal. It’s always banal, isn’t it, when great men are persecuted? Even Jesus was executed for a bullshit crime of supposedly proclaiming himself king of the Jews, and of course Epstein never harmed anybody either.
This resonates with me:
All the great world religions preach to free yourself from your attachment to money, reputation and family. If you do so, nothing threatens you. That's what you can learn from going to prison. If you have nothing, you have nothing to lose. To quote Buddha 'Sometimes you have to lose everything before you gain everything'.
Yeah, I did free myself from money, reputation and family though I still have ambitions about the latter, which also requires money at this point.
I also agree with what he says about fear:
So yes, the people who seem fearless do have fear. In fact, they probably experience more fear than anyone else. I feel fear every day, but it hasn't stopped me from making all the best decisions of my life (like dropping out of school, defending pedophiles, protesting against the Singapore government and being sent to prison a million times). It's alright to be afraid, so long as it doesn't decide your actions in life. In fact, if you're not doing something scary, you're probably not living up to your fullest potential, you're probably not doing what God wants you to do.
Now if only a good number of men would face their fear of saying something politically incorrect now and then, we would be getting somewhere. You don’t all have to go to prison or even be totally cancelled because if unlike me you already have a secure job they can’t usually fire you just for your political views.
I cant see how the school can legally kick you out?! That is insane!
I don’t understand how they can legally kick me out either. It is a moral panic with no sensible basis.
There were two NAV advisors (government employment agency which funds the school) with me at the meeting where I was informed that I was kicked out, and they were actually a bit skeptical of the reason, like they couldn’t quite believe how doing something unrelated to the job initiative could have this effect, but the moral panic is so strong that they went along with it.
Remember this is a cash cow for private owners (of a company called JobLoop). The owners are morally panicked of any association with me. This is not inference, it is what they said: they can’t put their name on any association with me and the owner is freaking out.
Supposedly they base their decision on feedback from a potential employer to whom they sent my CV (and I have never spoken to or been told who is, if they even exist), and then they generalize this to all employers. But really they have no way of knowing nobody would accept me after asking just one company, so they are really more concerned about their own reputation.
It all comes down to the cash cow for government money, I think, and is not a decision made by the government.
Since all I am accused of is expressing opinions I am legally entitled to in appropriate places, namely a personal blog, (never discussing politics offensively at the school), the government does not really care about this activity. It’s all private interests that are offended.
If you believe that the dismissal is illegal, you can complain to the Ombudsman.
Nah, I don't want to go back to a place where I'm so unwanted.
They can have their political correctness in peace even though I wasn't really disturbing it anyway.
You have to go out of your way to read my blog and the only time a normie will read it is when they are trying to fetch a prejudice for why someone should be excluded, and then only enough to build that prejudice. It becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy that way. There can be no debate about these matters because by the time they are aware that someone holds contrarian views he is already excluded.
Let them have their hallowed peace with the one true sexual morality, the only one they imagine can and does exist.
You see now why there are no heretics as far as the normies can see.
The point of fighting your dismissal is not necessarily to go back to a place you're not wanted but it is to punish those who punished you - and perhaps you can get compensation out of it. Was there a certificate or something you might have got at the end of it but you didn't? You can argue you would find it too distressing to go back after the way they treated you and hence you push for compensation for the damage to your future career, distress caused etc. If you win you might even be able to get yourself in the media again and trash the reputation of the school that kicked you out. It would also be a deterrent for other organisations to try the same game.
This is what Google AI told me about your case:
Regarding the situation with the Norwegian student and Kodehode, here is the breakdown of his potential legal standing in Norway:
1. Is Kodehode "Public" or "Private"?
This is the most critical detail. Kodehode is a program often run in collaboration with NAV (the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration).
If NAV-funded: The student has much stronger protections. Government entities must follow the Public Administration Act (Forvaltningsloven). An expulsion must be objectively justified, and he has a right to appeal the decision to the higher instance (usually the regional NAV office).
The Ombudsman: If it's a NAV case, he can contact Sivilombudet (The Parliamentary Ombudsman). They investigate if public authorities have committed an injustice against a citizen.
2. Freedom of Expression vs. "Suitability"
Norway has strong protections for Ytringsfrihet (Freedom of Speech) under Article 100 of the Constitution.
The Argument for the Student: Expressing unpopular or even offensive opinions on a personal blog generally does not disqualify someone from a coding course or an internship, unless those opinions directly interfere with the work environment (e.g., harassment of colleagues).
The Argument for Kodehode: They might argue "unsuitability" (uskikkethet). If they believe his public support for a convicted sex offender makes it impossible to place him in a partner company (thus making the program's goal impossible to achieve), they may claim they have a right to terminate the contract.
3. Discrimination on Political Grounds
The Equality and Anti-Discrimination Act (Likestillings- og diskrimineringsloven) prohibits discrimination based on political views.
He could file a complaint with Diskrimineringsnemnda (The Anti-Discrimination Tribunal). This is free and does not require a lawyer.
The tribunal would decide if "support for Epstein" constitutes a protected "political view" or if it falls outside the bounds of protected speech.
4. Practical Next Steps for Him
If he wants to fight this, he should:
Request a Written Reason: He must demand a formal, written explanation for the expulsion.
Contact a Lawyer: If he is "in poverty" as he claims, he likely qualifies for Fri rettshjelp (Free Legal Aid). He should contact a lawyer specializing in administrative or labor law.
The Labor Inspection Authority (Arbeidstilsynet): While usually for employees, they can sometimes provide guidance if the internship was part of a formal work agreement.
The Reality Check: While Norway protects speech, private companies have significant leeway in who they choose to mentor. However, being kicked out of the school/program itself for off-site blog posts is a much higher legal hurdle for the school to clear than a company simply saying "no" to an interview.
Do you happen to know if he received a formal written notice explaining exactly which paragraph of their regulations he supposedly violated?
Eivind, I would not be surprised if this is something the police is behind because the police are the most vindictive people with the most fragile ego's there is. And they don't forget about being totally humiliated in the court case against you, which they had to drop and making fools of themselves. Of course you would not have insight into this, but maybe a complaint to NAV or to sivilombudet or both would produce some interesting documentation. I have made such similar complaints myself and had documented relevations that I previously had no idea of before.
Compensation in Norway is so low that it's more of a punishment really, so nothing to hunt for. But getting a hold of documentation so you could release it and ridicule the involved would be great.
Sorry that this doesnt relate to ypur post, but just had to vent. I am so sick and tired of victim culture. I saw an anti C pedo just explain why they are anti c. They said that as a little kid they sucked some guys, and while they admit that the blowjob itself wasnt traumatic(duh its a fucking blowjob) they still claim to be a victim and that AMSC should be banned and come with a harsh penalty because they feel uncomfortable that they were “tricked” and that it was “transactional”. My view is that idgaf about blowjob trauma.
1. First, I have no idea what victims mean when they say they were “tricked” into having sex. Because if the older man said something like “can you suck my privates because it is sex and will make me feel good” that is not a trick, and theres no new information that you magically learn about blowjobs on midnight of your 18th birthday that would change the former expierence into a “trick”. They also say they “didnt understand it” but what is so complex and difficult to understand about sucking dick that young kid cant understand it, let alone until midnight of their 18th birthday, and they clearly were able to understand it to some degree considering that they were able to perform it.Even if they were genuinely tricked, would an open and postive attitude not DECREASE the amoont of trickery that happens in SOME cases of AMSC? If children were properly educated about sex instead of being banned from helpful knowledge because its “inappropriate” or “grooming”, if children were allowed to gain expierence in sexuality instead of being banned because its “csa”. Would that not DECREASE the so callled “trauma” associated with AMSC? The person says that children are harmed by AMSC by default and it should be banned because they lack the expierence surrounding sex, the expierence they only lack BECAUSE they are banned from having sex. I cant fucking stand “victims”.
2.The sex being “transactional”. Hich implies that that that they didnt like the sex because it happened, but because they werent sufficently pleasured back during the sex, which makes sense, because the “victim” in question already addmitted that the blowjob isnt what made them uncomfortable, but that it was “transactional” and they were “tricked”. But I dont see how their sexual experience being one sided=all sex under the legal age of majority must be banned, espcially since they admit that the sexual encounter didnt even harm then in the first place.
3. They say that a single bad sexual expierence can carry on in life, but a single bad expierence with literally anything and everything ever can carry on in life, so I dont see why this “it might be expierenced negatively so it must be banned at all cost, even if the banning causes more harm than the expierence itself” logic only applies to sexual situations.
Its this bs logic I cant stand about proffesional victims. They’ll say some shit like “oh I had sex before the legal age of majority therefore im a victim, not because I feel victimized or hurt of the expierence itself which I didnt mind or expierenced positively, but because of the shame and taboo and secrecy assosicated with my sexual expierence, which is why we should not only maintain the shame and taboo and secrecy assosicated with AMSC but increase it, for the victims protection of course” :D!
(I have more to say but comments too long ill come back)
No, I don’t think the police has anything to do with it. That was too long ago and you don’t need to postulate more entities to explain such knee-jerk reactions as are still happening from the Epstein panic. We are in the final days of that now, though. Norwegian newspapers are still running Epstein on the front page even as we have a global energy crisis in the making. This time is reminiscent of the time before COVID lockdowns where we can see a juggernaut coming but people still act like normal, which now means pretending the Epstein Files are the most important story in the world. But we are basically getting peak oil, for another reason but the effect will be the same.
No, I did not get a written explanation of why I was expelled and I obviously won’t get a certificate. They are loath to put their name and mine on anything which can be presented to employers since that would give them a moral panic about reputation which is their currency.
As to pursuing any appeal to ombudsman and such… No, I don’t think I will bother. The potential rewards here are too slim, like being reinstated in the course at best. I don’t think I could get any compensation since I was never financially rewarded beyond the basic needs welfare level that I am still on. I see the point that they shouldn’t be able to act like this as I fully believe I didn’t break the contract that we signed in the beginning which I recall them saying obligated them too and they broke it, but it’s better for me to move on.
Thanks for this venting which also provides valuable analysis of irrational taboos and sex-exceptionalism. You delineate well how the normies think and how their "logic" works, which it kind of does but only if you accept sex-exceptionalism.
We are to believe AMSC is this infinite negative utility monster which justifies all these draconian reactions and special rules that we seem to need even thought they become absurd when generalized outside the sexual realm. This gets down to what I call the metaphysical badness of sex and I have yet to see any sensible justification for believing in it.
Would you consider this Eivind? AI probably wont cancel you. https://rentahuman.ai/
So...we spent trillions investing in AI infrastructure only to rediscover that you need a human to get an actual job done? Lol!
Second part: Theres also the “they cpuld be blackmailed or forced into AMSC” but guess what? No pro C is arguing that force or blackmail should be legal and force and blackmail is already illegal for adults. Not to mention, force or blackmail due to inexpeirence only INCREASES if you artficially ban minors from getting said expierence in the fucking first place?! And how come “potential” force or blackmail is only a justifictation for an outright ban when it comes to sexual pleasure between minors and adults, but no other form of pleasure or any activity in general between minors and adults?? Ive seen children fucking skydiving and cliff jumping and caving, and no ones saying “oh due to the lack of experience minors have with skydiving or cliff jumping or caving the adult could’ve blackmailed or forced them so it should be banned, despite the fact that unlike sucking dick, the three other activities can cause DEATH, or PERMENANT CRIPPLING DEFORMITIES(and not “oh I feel ashamed and tricked skydiving because I didn’t understand how planes work and only the adult enjoyed it, but actual fucking death). Whats so special about sex, and how come the “life long trauma from special magical sex” only exists in cultures where sex is seen as inherently evil and predatory and disgusting?
(I havent even touched on the fact that the creator of said post is a self admitted pedo, so the reason that they as an adult dislike the thought of sexual encounters with adults is because they arent even attracted to them in the first place?? But of course they would likely claim that the “csa” “made” them a pedo and that liking hot young girls/boys/pedophillia is a highly contagious disease or something. They said that that when they imagine having sex with adults they feel their hair stand up on end and feel uncomfortable, and they blame this on the “csa” and “trauma”. But heres the thing, so do I and the majority of other MAPs, not because of “molestation” or “trauma” but because were not attracted to adults?!
Unfortunantly I couldnt respond to the post, but all I have to say is, the “pain and trauma” they will face as a pedo in a society that views bjs as a fate worse than death itself will be far more “victimizing” than sucking some guys dick ever will be.(I also love that the “life ruining irreprable harm tbat can only be justified with decades in prison or death itself” in question is always some shit like feeling ashamed and tricked that they had sex as a minor in a society that views sex with minors as shameful form of trickery. If the “irreparable unjustified irreversible harm” was something like permanent seizures or cancer or partial blindless I would at least understand, but its always something like “feeling uncomfortable”. Istfg
Good points. We don't believe in any metaphysical harm in skydiving or rock climbing or any number of truly dangerous activities that are considered wholesome for kids. Just the physical danger of getting splattered on a cliff somewhere, but that’s nothing compared to the most willing “CSA.” Sex-exceptionalism is a virus of the mind.
Seeing the latest blasts in Riyadh I stand in increasing awe of Iran:
https://t.me/Novichok_Rossiya_2/46272
They were not bluffing when they said they can destroy American interests. It just takes slightly more than a 12-day war to prove it.
Initial strikes from Iran were always underwhelming, but there was a good reason for that. They have methodically eroded American and Israeli air defenses until now they can pretty much destroy any target in the region at will. It was smart to use up the oldest and cheapest missiles and drones first and save the best and heaviest warheads for now and as long as it takes to win. Iran has Trump twirled around their little fingers and this time they will make sure he can’t get back up and treacherously try to decapitate them again.
A side effect will be a global economic disaster. Rising fuel prices alone will bring down the Trump presidency (having lived there I know how sensitive Americans are to what it costs to fill up their tank), but it will get much worse with all kinds of supply chain disruptions and shortages. The oil price might go to 200 dollars briefly but won’t stay there because the economy can’t pay so much and the resulting loss of economic activity will be the real problem.
And it’s so stupid to bring such a crisis on ourselves that I have to wonder if there isn’t some invisible hand guiding Trump’s idiocy and he’s more like a puppet of entropy, chaos and the inherent fragility of complex systems running on thinner and thinner margins and returns everywhere. The covid lockdowns were kind of like that too and probably extended our civilization somewhat as we conserved resources but this is set to be much worse and rather speed up collapse as we blow things up.
Anyway, I don’t care because I can’t get any poorer until we all starve together. I rather enjoyed the pandemic because it brought the normies down to my level when all their wealth became useless to do anything with. If relative status is a major determinant of mood I am looking forward to another boost.
Of course, there is another much, much greater determinant of mood, viz. how much younger women you get, but don’t expect a running commentary on that, ok? Covid was AMAZING for me in that respect and, well, I can hope for a repeat.
I do feel I have more beautiful expression in me but I can’t say it any better than the poets have already done, can I? So let’s just ponder that youth is a flower that lasts but an hour; gather ye rosebuds while ye may; her early leaf’s a flower, but only so an hour…
No, actually, I feel I can say it better (in prose) but it will have to wait for appropriate times. At the risk of sounding cocky I even feel I can best Humbert’s project to “capture the perilous magic of nymphets,” but you don’t have to believe me :)
I am probably just deluded from studying English for so long that I think I know something. Either that or the nofapping horniness is making me cocky, or both.
Yes Eivind, but in a strange way I am very optimisic. As we've seen in history moral hysterias always end up eating themselves with their own bs. The arguments against AMSC are so ridiculous, easily debunked by both a plethora of scientiffic and anecdotal evidence and common sense, and so far removed from reality and self contradictory, that it will be EXTREMELY easy for future generations to call out our generations bs(its easy now, but the hysteria is just low enough that its still tolerable for the average normies, like frogs in a slow boiling pot, once normies start getting accused of “eye contact based csa” and 17 yr olds get hatecrimed for flirting with 15 yr olds or something else retarted like that they will be less staunch on their position if not abandon it entirely. I find it very easy arguing against antis, it is far easier to argue with them than any other group I oppose because their arguments are so shallow and never based on reality.
There line of thinking isnt “AMSC is harmful therefore its bad” but “AMSC is bad therefore its harmful”, and that faulty leap in logic is extremely self evident in their counterattacks. Its just non stop logical fallacys, seriously, just pull up a list of logic fallacys and any argument against AMSC will check of each one. But to antis the logic and common sense doesnt matter, its the hysterical emotions and do goodery that does, the feeling of superiority(the pedo even ended the post saying that they were one of the good pedos who could NEVER ruin a teenage boys life by sucking their dick) but they can only remove themselves from reality for so long before reality fights back.
The anti c pedos will be hit espcially hard, claiming that sucking a kids dick is a fate worse than death and that anyone who does it is an evil monster deserving of death, and then claim that your one of the good pedos who only fantasizes about sucking kid dick constantly every single night and has to actively resist sucking kiddie dick, yeah, good luck with that anti Cs. That will work out just as well as the gays against sodomy
I saw a boy of about 5 going cliff diving on tiktok. Some comments were angry and saying it was unsafe, but no comments about how he will be scarred for life and ruined forever because his brain isnt developed enough to consent to cliffs and that the parents should be murdered in a prison cell. No forcing lawmakers to raise the age of cliff diving consent to 18. No parents getting doxxed and harrased and stalked for forcing a non conseual underdevloped party into “cliff diving abuse”. No comment saying that even seeing a photo of a cliff was a form of life altering trauma that he could never recover from. 5 year old boys are mentally devloped enough to consent to jumping off fucking cliffs but will be traumatized and scarred for life if they even SEE a penis. Good god.
Ill be honest, I used to be an anti. From 0-15 I was pro/neutural C. From 17-19 I was an anti, and now I am pro C. My change from anti C(pedos should be murdered!) to pro C(why are we murdering people over handjobs?) happened in the span of a couple months. Not because of magical pedo mind control grooming, but because I started *asking questions*. I would ask myself “why does touching some guys dick lead someone under their local goverments legal age of majoirty to have trauma?” “How come a 14 yr old can conesent with no trauma in one country but magically be traumtized if they move to a different country?” “What even is this so called “trauma” and how does it “ruin lives” if all csa “victims” have stable jobs and perfectly normal average lives?” Thats how the csa panic will be broken and thats how the csa panic maintains itself, antis refuse to question anything surrounding the csa narrative and reitarate thought terminating cliches (“minors cant consent”, I just ask them to define what consent is and it breaks their little anti brains) thats why ive found the easiest way to change antis mind is not to spout facts at them, but to question them and their stupid “logic”
(for example, instead of quoting statics of boys not being harmed 69ing their older boyfriends, ask the anti “why does sucking some guys dick traumtize the legal minor, how do you explain tribes and cultures were pedastry is normalized? How have humans evolved to become the strongest species if our young are so weak that their own genitals give them brain injuries? What magical biological event happens on your 18th birthday?” I ask antis these questions and it works like a charm Everytime
(btw I was only an anti because of my internal shame and social pressure, my friends at school kept telling me how gross and “problamatic” pedos were so I adopted their views to fit in, but for most of my childhood i didnt feel to strongly about pedos either way, not to mention I was one myself)
There's a huge new abuse allegation against Caesar Chavez, a civil rights and labor leader. This appeared practically overnight and now there's already efforts to remove his name from places.
Thanks for two more excellent comments by Anonymous. I am impressed you changed your mind from anti and started thinking clearly! Which is so easy because the fallacies couldn't be more retarded and hard at the same time because of social pressure. The MAP movement is in good hands with bright young voices like yours; it won't die with the legends like Heretic TOC as I have been worrying because it is evidently still possible to grow up as a rational thinker no matter how bad the panic gets.
galilieo233, yeah, I saw those allegations against Caesar Chavez. An impressive historical figure with a lot farther to fall than me, but the result is always the same: remove his name from any association.
If you look at his Wikipedia you find this long amazing history and then bam, a sudden revision cancelling all that:
On March 17, 2026, allegations of sexual abuse against Chavez led United Farm Workers to cancel their tribute to Chavez just weeks before the annual event. UFW statements indicated that Chavez was accused of sexually abusing minors. The following day, The New York Times published an investigation into Chavez, reporting that he had sexually abused two adolescent girls on a regular basis between 1972 and 1977. In addition, the Times reported that he raped Dolores Huerta or coerced her into sex on several occasions, which led to pregnancies and to Huerta having the children raised by others. Following the Times investigation, Huerta disclosed that she had told the now-adult individuals the truth about their conception several weeks before the article came out. Due to the ongoing allegations, states, counties, and cities are removing his name from the planned Cesar Chavez Day that is hosted year round to commemorate his legacy.
"Sexually abused two adolescent girls on a regular basis" sounds like completely normal relationships since even within the panic they can't bring themselves to call it rape. The other one might on the face of it be an abuse story, but that's ONE accuser getting to ruin an entire life of admirable works, and how credible is she? I guess we are not even supposed to ask that question before cancelling.
John Michael Greer has published another essay on Situationism:
https://www.ecosophia.net/situationism-the-art-of-detournement/
What he says here is timely now that I contemplate (and have time for) creative expression (literally the only "job" I can do when cancelled from everything else, but only becomes a job if my work gets popular and monetizable somehow). It is something I wish I had known 30 years ago before becoming a student of art and literature, and also the end result gleaned from all those studies, though I have never thought it so succinctly until now. If you have any kind of artistic ambition these days you should realize that innovation has run its course and the arts are now in performance mode:
That’s normal in every culture, and most societies make the transition from the age of innovation to the age of performance without too much difficulty, even with a sigh of relief. Our culture is uniquely burdened in this context by its obsession with the phantasm of perpetual progress. Even as the arts themselves settle down comfortably into performance mode, with musicians striving to play Bach and Mozart perfectly and writers turning out endless variations on rigidly defined fictional genres—the murder mystery, the bodice-ripping romance, the politician’s press release, and so on—there are always intellectuals who can’t stand the thought that the Western world’s age of creative innovation has run its course in the usual way.
And so it is possible that for example Lolita now permanently occupies the pinnacle of that archetype, and one can only "perform" a variation rather than be truly creative and innovate further. Well, I can say that if you try at least the normies won't be giving you any competition. Their "innovation" (which is really also just variation at this point) now consists of reframing everything as sexual abuse and of course they won't even attempt to write a glorious account of something they feel morally obliged to label as abuse and abuse material.
And just forget about poetry, which is so hard that I can't name a single living notable poet. I guess the most notable poets these days are LLMs since they can churn out endless variations close to good but never innovate either.
Greer could be wrong, particularly on our kind of subject matter since it is so absurdly suppressed, but as always his post is food for thought and he is highly insightful.
My “favorite” thing about SA accusations is when normies try to claim that they believe in “believe all victims” and “guiilty until proven innocent” at the same time. Thats literally impossible. Thats like saying your an athiest who believes in god. Yet no one questions it? For someone to be a victim to “believe” in that means that the other party is guilty by default and quite literally CANNOT be innocent. And of course this logic only applies to sex crimes, because sex is yicky and gross and we cant risk any orgasm going unpunished.
One thing that really pisses me off is when normies say “why would they lie?” in cases where the reward, sorry, “justice” for a guilty conviction is millions of dollars in a payout+even more money spouting your “traumatic event” and “spreading awareness” with crocodile tears on talkshows and podcasts and news networks. Even with the money removed, all the positive attention and sympathy and fame of getting to destroy a famous person or political enemy alone begs the question of why WOULDNT they lie? “wHy WoUlD tHeY LiE?” Idk karen maybe because if they win the trial they get millions of fucking dollars in a payout? Because they will be worshiped by society as a whole, not for even doing anything valuable or worthwile, but for “surviving”(surviving a blowjob that is)A trial they are almost GUARANTEED to win no matter how little proof or evidence they have because of “believe all victim” cunts like you???
(Also how children NEVER lie about “csa”, unless they say that they werent abused and have no blowjob trauma and that they enjoyed the sex and were willing participants, or that nothing sexual even happened in the first place, then they are of course lying)
Yeah, of course money is a huge motivation for accusing. The most absurd record must be when the Epstein compensation industry managed to get 1.5 million dollars awarded to a hand-holding survivor. And conversely, the girl he actually he had sex with who unwillingly supplied evidence that got him convicted never tried to profit from it if I understood Michael Tracey correctly. None felt abused at the time; some others turned around later because they got too tempted by the money but I think that original girl remained nice.
Sorry *innocent until proven guilty* is what I meant to say in the first sentence
Thats what ive realized about the victim industry, its a huge moneymaker, and I mean HUGE. Police officers making money from locking up sex offenders. Prisons making money of sex offenders and prison labour. Politicians making money off their anti csa campaigns(no politician has been cancelled for being too HARD on sex offenders). Psychs making money giving therapy to “victims”, psychs making money giving therapy to pedos for their “pedophillic disorder”. Victim payouts going in the millions. No one has money to donate to the kids being starved and beaten but will empty their wallets dry to the kid who got her tits fondled by her older boyfriend. Its all money. I guarantee you if money was completely removed from the picture the csa panic would collapse in less than a decade(of course its more than just money since our culture hates sex, but seriously)
Also, on pedophilic disorder, how is men liking hot young girls a mental disorder(but only if they havent hit puberty, if theyve hit puberty your not ill just evil, if they havent your ill AND evil)?! And they try to draw the line at puberty when they say what makes pedophillia an illness but hebephillia not, because it “goes against nature” to be into prepubscents, but then say that being attracted to/having sex with under 18 adolescents goes against nature and that naturally men are hardwired to only be into people 18+ and anyone under 18 is biologically hardwired to be traumatized by anyone over 18(but only if sex is involved).
This is what I mean by the csa narrative being full of contradictions. They say that most/all men are biologically hardwired to want to have sex with adolescent girls but are also biologically hardwired to NOT want to have sex with adolescents girls because its “predatory” and “traumatic”, and teenage girls are biologically hardwired to get pregnant and have physical characteristics that attract adult men but are also biologically hardwired to get brain injuries if they have sex with one??! They say that hebephillia/ephebophillia isnt a mental illness since most men are hardwired to be attracted to teenage girls and teen girls have dated men throughout history just fine, then in the same sentence say that being attracted to teenage girls isnt normal because biologically your only supposed to be attracted to legal adults and if your under the legal age of majority your biologically hardwired to be traumatized by sex?? omfg can these people make up their mind?!
Right, our nature is not generally evil and not designed for us to be traumatized by following our instincts. Evolution doesn’t really care how we feel, but it does “care” (via selection pressures) about having well-adjusted individuals to raise offspring. Obviously nature does not produce sexually mature and attractive individuals who get pregnant and give birth only to be inherently traumatized and broken by the sex, since that would make bad parents.
Can’t use the same argument to justify prepubescent sex, but there would have to be an additional reason to be traumatized besides just not being developed, otherwise it’s like saying children are traumatized by algebra because they can’t understand it or need it yet. I think at worst they would tend to be bored if there is no force or violence/pain and the boredom isn’t guaranteed either because playfulness is built into the young for many things that are not so serious yet. Now if there is an adaptation for some special traumatization from sexuality just because it is sexuality and sexuality is exceptionally harmful for some reason, I would like to see some evidence for that, but so far I haven’t heard of anything convincing.
Iran has a message for us:
https://t.me/Novichok_Rossiya_2/46425
"For the victims of Epstein Island. We are targeting the idol of Baal."
Okie dokie.
I guess the IRGC hasn’t gotten a chance to peruse the journalism of Michael Tracey yet, who is the only one who can authoritatively inform them that there were no victims of Epstein Island, so they can be forgiven for thinking so for now.
Surely the Iranians are not so stupid as to think sexuality is inherently traumatizing to young women and teens who engage in it willingly?
And if this insane conspiracy theory about actual rape and abuse at Epstein Island helps to destroy the (ironically and unbeknownst to them) utterly sex-hostile civilization they are fighting, I’m not complaining.
Thankyou! Your one of the few hebe/epehobhilies who isnt hypocritical about prepubsecent sexuality. So many hebephiles are against 18 being a magical number but consider 12/puberty to be a magical number. They will say something like “antis saying the being a day before 18 will make a handjob or tit fondeling traumatizing is stupid, but if your a day under 12 or have yet to grow a bush you will suffer life long severe harm and trauma if some guy plays with your dick, even if you enjoy the sexual encounter and suffer no harm or trauma, because reasons”. And it is very frustrating. The only form of sexual encounter I would be against for younger kids is penetrative sex because theres an actual case for inherent harm,(not for all kids though, I have heard anecdotal evidence of kids prepuberty having this form of sex and not being harmed, and I believe them but it also needs to be studied more, not to mention Muhammad's 9 year old wife,) but I have yet to see any proof that a lack of pubic hair leads children to getting brain injuries if they touch a penis, let alone all the evidence throughout history of children NOT receiving brain injuries from sexual contact before puberty.
From mothers fondling infant genitals to soothe them or fetuses in the womb purposefully masturbating to completion along with infant and toddler masturbation and the American age of consent being 7-10(the age of puberty was around 15, so even 12 year olds would be prepubscent to the hebes dismay, and for “trauma” and “harm” as severe as the antis postulate its “surprising” that there are no documents of children this age being permanently crippled from sucking dick) to Muhammad and his 9 year old wife, which would be impossible in a society where this wasnt at least legal, if not normal.
Outside the science, all the anedoctal evidence alone of prepuberty kids “playing doctor” proves that penis trauma isnt the default, and kids are naturally curious, if not straight up pleasured, by *gasp* sexual pleasure, not pained.
It makes no sense for nature to evolve for a sexual species, that quite literally depends on sex for its own survival, that is also the most dominant and advanced species on the entire planet, to purposefully evolve for any human who hasnt grown their bush yet to recieve a brain injury if they touch a dick or have their balls played with, humanity would've lasted 10 years if we were that god damn weak. Either an orgasm is just an orgasm and shouldn't be limited to any age or orgasms are inherently dangerous and painful and traumatizing and if that is the case there is no reason why the aoc should be 12 and not 18.
"if not straight up pleasured, by *gasp* sexual pleasure"
Yes... I put it too weakly when I only mentioned playfulness and curiosity doesn't quite cover it either. Obviously there is pleasure and lust too before puberty, if not universal then very common as I well remember in myself and is attested by the undisputed fact that many young children masturbate.
I remember my own sexual feelings and strong curiosity before puberty, of course it wasn't as strong until I reached puberty, but it was very much there. Even when I reached puberty, I didnt start puberty and develop stronger sexual feelings at the magical special number of 12 let alone 18, but around 9. So even if sexual feelings didn't start at all until puberty(which is false, or else we wouldn't have little kids on the sex offender registry or in “therapy” for “playing doctor” or “cocsa”, not to mention the plethora of evidence of prepubescent masturbation and sexual exploration and our own experiences as kids) didn't start till puberty, the average kid, at least in the modern day west, starts puberty before 12, and the normal range can be as early as 8.
Also, just saw a video of a 5 year old girl nearly getting stomped on by a sheep she was riding at a rodeo. Little girls are developed enough to get their tiny spines stomped on and crushed by large animals but cant even BEGIN to understand the complexities and dangers of touching some guys dick, lol. When I tell you this sheep was inches away from fucking killing, if not paralyzing that tiny girl, but the audience was just like “oh whoopsie daisy”. But if that same girl went home and touched some guys dick they would be out for blood. “We just want to protect children from harm” my fucking ass. The best way to collapse the hysteria has less to do with humanizing pedos, and more to do with debunking the “harm” argument, because we will never be seen as human if touching some guys dick is seen as a million times more harmful then getting crushed to death by animals
When I grew up for a long time we had only one channel on TV and of course no Internet. Some people had more channels because they had parabolic antennas but it was common to have only one, the Norwegian state broadcaster NRK. Now we all have umpteen media and social media channels yet they all manage to converge on ONE insane conspiracy theory completely out of touch with reality with only Michael Tracey as a corrective and where anyone who disagrees gets cancelled. In retrospect I think we had more diverse voices on that one state monopoly channel back then than we do on all the other channels and 99.999% of the Internet combined now. For example we had people like Tor Erling Staff who would speak exactly like me about the Epstein panic if he were confronted with it.
Isn’t it funny that we had more freedom of thought back when we all consumed the same media? How did de we go so wrong that all this independent media all lead to the same deranged place?
Here’s another good interview with Tracey, on Epstein and media malpractice and how they all came to the same insane conclusions. I am impressed by how diligently he pushes back on all the nonsense all the way down to the label of “contrarian” which he feels unfair because it implies he disagrees out of a disposition to be different rather than letting the facts guide him.
You don’t have to be a contrarian to disagree with the Epstein panic and you don’t have to be a pedophile either because it’s just plainly fictitious and that’s all you should need to know to dismiss it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GH1yr8IbZg
Eivind, considering the great financial incentives these so-called “victims” are taking advantage of in regards to the Epstein panic, do you believe that the popular phrase “Money is the root of all evil”, true?
Money is a huge factor not just motivating the "victims" and their lawyers but also the conspiracy theorists who use Epstein for clickbait.
But the root of evil here is cultural drift. We drifted into a culture where belief in a supposed ultimate evil called "child sexual abuse" enables all this insanity. Without the CSA hoax becoming our culture starting in the 1970s, there would be no occasion to profit from it either.
You could argue that the Epstein panic in turn drives the CSA hoax, and maybe to some extent this is true. It certainly helps expand it to teens and young women and not so young women who are still treated like delicate victims just because they occur in the Epstein files and thus must be redacted, reinforcing our view that something sinister is going on and this in turn being expanded to any reference to sexuality made by any of the men involved in any context whatsoever relating to women of any age. In the end this shit must collapse on itself but we are not there yet.
It's so funny to see the Norwegians STILL trying to chart just how witchy Mette-Marit is...
https://www.dn.no/politikk/mette-marit-til-nrk-jeg-ble-manipulert-og-lurt/2-1-1963101
Even though unlike me she probably never had a heretical thought in her head in her life :)
Admittedly I REALLY deserve to be cancelled when they can do THIS to a COMPLETE normie.
Yes, Ive noticed that even young women can be victims of csa. Young men on occasion as well. By femminist logic, women are strong and independent and can do anything a man can do and also ultra fragile perma victims who are victimized and traumatized by anything and everything and are at the mercy of superior magical patriarchal pedo mind control grooming powers. Whenever femminist say that a young women is being “groomed” if she enters a relationship with someone older and the aoc needs to be raised I just respond with either “grooming her into doing what” or “so your saying young women AREN'T strong or independent or capable of making their own choices about their own lives and bodies and DO need the government to decide for them?”
Women are never responsible unless of course they are "sex offenders" themselves. There is a fine line between grooming victim and witch. Mette-Marit is currently considered a fellow CSA witch along with Epstein, but trying to move into the "groomed" category:
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/20/europe/norway-crown-princess-interview-epstein-intl-scli
Friday she regretted her friendship with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, seeking to contain one of the biggest scandals to hit the country’s royal family...
“I was manipulated and deceived,” Mette-Marit said in a tearful interview with public broadcaster NRK screened on Friday morning...
“Of course, I wish I had never met him,” she said of Epstein... “He used the fact that we had a mutual friend, and that I’m gullible. I like to believe the best about people. But I also chose to end contact with him,” Mette-Marit said.
By the way she has serious health issues requiring a lung transplant, but harassing her relentlessly is considered entirely appropriate in this panic just because she happened to know Epstein.
When other people are so different, it’s hard to see them as conscious beings. They appear as reflexive reactors to a script written into their minds while I stood beside and watched. Since I witnessed their infection with the CSA hoax and Epstein panic on top while being immune myself, the normies are too predictable for me to see them as free-willed entities. I realize that people don’t have morality: they have blank slates to be inscribed by tribal norms which they then follow to a T in order to belong to the tribe and usually believe in too. If you have a friend who is loyal to you rather than the tribe you are lucky, but mostly they will turn against you at the flip of a switch based on the aforementioned script when told you are a heretic to that script.
Amos Lee has made another post. I would like to hear what Eivind thinks.
https://www.amosyee.org/slaves.html
Amos is giving advice mainly directed at Singaporeans there. I had to look up what an HDB flat is.
"HDB flats are public housing in Singapore managed by the Housing & Development Board, housing nearly 80% of residents."
Okay, that fits the rest of the tone that Singaporeans are kind of oppressed semi-communist worker bees.
He is right, not the ideal life to strive for, but I wouldn't go so far as to claim prison is better either like he does. Amos does seem to have a fetish for protesting and going to prison repeatedly with the reasons for protesting being almost an afterthought.
I don't think protesting the national service in Singapore and getting three years in prison just for that is something I would bother.
But we sure are lucky to have him as a MAP protester! For which there are very serious reasons.
So I'm grateful, but also find him a bit of a masochist.
I keep trying to tell people that morality is subjective when they say shit like “csa is objectively morally wrong” or “its objective human morals for humans to want to protect innocent children from harm.
But who gets defined as human(evil pedo monsters vs normies) what gets defined as protection(restricting bodily autonomy and using said restrictions to justify gross human rights violations in the name of “justice”) what ever the fuck “innocence” is(didnt even exist as a concept till the 1800s, before then children were seen as extremely sinful in the west, even now, “innocence” is just a synonym for asexual and is completely arbritrary in meaning.
Who gets defined as a child(the age of adulthood in America used to be 21, now it is 18, in some cultures you are an adult at the start of puberty, plenty of healthy kids start puberty at 8, and malnutrition can delay it till the mid teens, in some cultures you arent seperated or catorgorized by age so its less child vs adult and more helpful to the community vs nonhelpful) and what is “harm”(the aoc used to be 7 in america, for a time it was 21 and now in most states its 16, and beating the ever loving fuck out of a small child is considered “discipline” and not harm and fully legal if blood isnt drawn, but gently rubbing some teen girls ass is not only considered harm, but the most severe harm, worse than death itself).
A couple decades ago pouring acid on black people swimming in a pool was moral. Now adays calling people homeless instead of unhoused is considered immoral. Morality has jack shit to do with “harm” or “justice” and is just the ideas that are convenient for the dominant society. Thats why you have to think for yourself and form your own ideas instead of just going “well most people think like this so it must be right”.
Most people thought burning gays was right too, and gassing jews, and chattel slavery, but im supposed to believe that the same species that was burning gays not too long ago for evil gay blowjobs has suddenly figured it out and become morally wholesome when they say lynching pedos is moral because of evil pedo blowjobs? Please. The very concept of locking some pederast up in prison for years or decades because he sucked some kids dick or merely looked at pictures of some kid getting their dick sucked makes me laugh my ass off until I renember that csa is a real phenomenon that most people believe in and real lives are destroyed over it(not the dick sucking but the idea that dick sucking is a fate worse than death itself)Its nice to now that I am not alone on feeling this way, even though heretic voices are hard to come by, espcially now adays as the hysteria worsens and free speech is more eradicated.
Yep, morality is always changing but suffering stays constant. We have always known slaves didn’t want to be slaves and getting whipped hurts. I am all for having a morality against those things.
But pleasant sexual experiences never hurt or traumatized anybody unless you go out of your way to create other unpleasant consequences like we do now because our morality is based on faulty premises postulating a metaphysical badness of sex which is pure nonsense.
I am a valence-realist. That means subjective experience of pain or pleasure is real. It is subjective in the sense that only the person experiencing these qualia gets to decide how they feel, and objective in the sense that their feeling is real and not subject to redefinition by society. The CSA hoax is an attack on valence-realism and I don’t buy it because I don’t believe in an alternative world which is supposed to override what people actually feel.
To clarify a bit, when I say only you get to decide how you feel I meant only you get to experience it and that’s an objective fact. Not decide in the sense that I can assign any valence I want to my experience for any reason. For example, I can’t right now decide that I am in 10/10 pain because that would be objectively false. There is an objective fact of the matter of subjective experiences and believing so is called valence-realism.
I suppose the CSA hoax is more compatible with an illusionist view of consciousness, such as promoted by Daniel Dennett or Keith Frankish. If there are no qualia then we can dismiss sexual pleasure as not being real. I still don’t see where the supposed pain is coming from, however.
And I don’t believe in illusionism. If not all qualia we think we have then at least valence must be real sometimes, and valence is a kind of quale, hence illusionism is false.
I think the police had something to do with you being thrown out of school. Police have their tentacles in almost everything in Norway. I know this for sure. They somehow know if someone that have previously been accused of sexual offences are travelling abroad, and stopping them from doing so in an obviously unlawful way: https://www.tv2.no/nyheter/sekunddrama-pa-gardermoen-stoppet-overgrepsdomt-i-siste-liten/18529215/
You were thrown out of school because the police(which are reading your blog many times daily) are bitter and in rage over the fact that your case were thrown out and that you also made them look like clowns in the compensation case that you won. This is put into the polices computer system and they get daily updates about you and about other people the moronic people that have their work in police get everyday when they log on the police-system. You are probably listed as a pedophile and as someone that want's to hurt police in the internal police computer system, and you are never going to be forgotten until you are dead. It does not matter if you're case was dismissed or if you had been acquitted. Police have been given the privilege to do whatever they want.
You can not hate police enough!
That’s fucked up what Norwegian police did that that man who wasn’t suspected of anything specific and simply was going to leave the country. They cancelled his passport preemptively before he could travel. It does, however, still seem to require a prior conviction. I can’t, by definition, disprove secret activities, but they haven’t impeded my life (including international travel) since they were told by the courts that I did nothing illegal. They certainly don’t have the right to cancel my passport or anything like that and I don’t know what legal basis they had against that man either, but it would be one step further to do it without a criminal record.
We don’t need any secret police work to explain the Epstein-related cancellations since they take care of themselves in this hysterical climate. Indeed this with-hunt is so unprecedented that we need new words to describe how bizarre it is.
Mette-Marit is a secondary witch for associating with Epstein the primary witch. Or maybe Epstein is the Satan and Mette-Marit is a primary witch for visiting him? Anyway, I’m a secondary or tertiary witch for supporting Epstein. And Kodehode would be practicing witchcraft in the third or fourth degree for trying to hook me up with employers, who in turn would be witches in the fifth degree if they hired me. Obviously they all get moral panic attacks all on their own, more than enough to compel them to cancel me immediately like they did.
My video endorsement of Michael Tracey:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpZWyHSTw0Q
Cities and college campuses across the United States have already begun to scrub away or censor any likeness related to Cesar Chavez (example shown below) in light of the recent sexual abuse allegations.
https://youtube.com/shorts/BFxPFDlPfOs?si=a4XgePzxCW33c4o0
Statues and plaques are being dismantled or covered up immediately in response to a single utterance of an accusation, which is all that it takes to destroy someone’s reputation overnight (no “proof” required).
Perhaps since the world is so incredibly “sex-exceptionalistic”, the censorship is occurring at lightning speed, unlike if it was a controversy not related to sex, then his identity removal probably wouldn’t have been so imminent.
That's the city of San Fernando removing a life-sized statue of Cesar Chavez using a backhoe, directed by the mayor, so not just a protest crowd either but bureaucracy, which usually moves slowly but not for "sexual abuse" accusations. A monument which took a lifetime to earn and no doubt years to plan removed in a few days because someone made an accusation. The mayor also wants name changes to streets and schools.
Oh, so I guess the mayor of “whatevertown” can care less about history being erased then?
Perfect.
So Cesar Chavez is being unpersoned, eh? Another one.
Using a backhoe after some hoes from way back made some complaints.
-Anonymous 2
It is surprising any statue of former kings and nobelmen is left standing. By Today's standards, Louis the XIVth and Co are all sex abusers. I suspect though that little or no money can be retrieved by going back too far in time. While in all likelyhood some money can be clawed back from Cesar Chavez's estate.
How is it that you have ended up in poverty despite coming so ridiculously early to Bitcoin? I recall coming across your blog back in 2014 when you were deep in to Tverberg's fast collapse theory (I was taken in by it too which at that time put me off Btc because I thought it wasn't sustainable from an energy point of view)
Since I never had a normal income or disability pension like other people in Norway who don't have normal jobs, I had to use my crypto earnings to live from hand to mouth when I was a miner. I never had a chance to save and wait for the price to rise, at least not at the right times when it really did.
So your question is like asking an American: How come you ended up in poverty despite working minimum wage at McDonald's all your life? You could have invested a few days' wages in Bitcoin and been rich!
It doesn't work like that. Other poor people knew about Bitcoin too and are still poor, including many early bitcoiners. Of course in retrospect we should have had more faith and held at any cost, but that's not so easy when you are dirt poor and the price is stuck or declining for years at a time.
Amos Lee has been arrested in Singapore.
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/amos-yee-national-service-enlistment-charged
I'm sorry to hear Amos is now in the grips of the Singaporean regime who I learned from that article requires an "exit permit" to leave, which he didn't have and is now charged for violating along with the Enlistment Act which looks likely to give him three years in prison there. He is right his country is quite oppressive.
Nonetheless, I am glad to see the defiant attitude conveyed through the Singaporean press via his blog posts and hope he is able to keep communicating with us that way or at least resume his activism in three years.
Having watched you video, I feel like giving you piece of advice : try not to look too freakish (the "christic" looks were the limit).
On top of your unorthodox ideas, these looks are quite a burden and they make it difficult for the "normies" not to recoil. I know you despise them but don't you have to come to term with them to survive and then go on with the life you've planned ?
Lots of hyper-intelligent people are on the verge of madness. Try not to step over the threshold.
It doesn’t matter how I look at this point since I’m a pariah from my opinions alone after a lifetime of sexualist activism which will filter me out (when they do the inevitable background checks) from ever being considered for a “respectable” role such as employment.
I do not believe you or anyone can diagnose madness from looks alone. I believe what I present in that video is a STYLE and just that, and of course a performance according to my artistic judgment. Yes, now it gets imbued with hate and called “freakish” because everyone already hates me, but it would be interpreted entirely differently if their prejudice said I was an admirable person such as a rock star who hasn’t been cancelled yet. There is no way to “win” by having the “right” look when you are a hated person.
I have appropriate feelings for a society which puts me dead last, in the bottom 0.1% of socioeconomic status and dropping further as I become almost the only one in Norway who has stayed so poor for so long. I can’t change my status but I don’t need to grovel on top of being a loser and try to please the normies by doing something like apologizing or adapting my style to be a normie, which can’t work anyway plus I believe it’s objectively false that normies don’t have similar looks. Again, it’s all about perception which will be negative for a pariah no matter how he actually looks.
"I do not believe you or anyone can diagnose madness from looks alone."
I'm not prejudiced. I'm just convinced that's what people in general would believe.
If you have unpopular ideas, what's the point of reinforcing people's prejudice ? (Of course you can say you don't give a damn which is strange for someone who's certainly put off by some women's physical appearance).
You have an artistic judgment about your own performance but this judgment isn't necessarily shared by those who watch you including people who respect your ideas.
"Again, it’s all about perception"
Yes. But you don't have to look exactly what people already think you are. It's a way of reinforcing the animosity of people who already hate you and proving them right (in their own eyes of course).
Amelio said,
"I'm not prejudiced. I'm just convinced that's what people in general would believe."
So you are asking me to change my style based on a sort of simulated prejudice, a prejudice of how you think normie prejudice works.
The normies only come here to confirm a prejudice, and they will always find a way to confirm their prejudice. Notice that they never come here to debate or learn what evidence we have for our views. That might have happened 15-20 years ago but now there is none of that. I am either ignored or investigated just enough that they can check their boxes for cancellation, beyond which there is no communication at all.
And even if you are right about their purely aesthetic prejudice also playing a major role here, it’s not the sort of reasons that shall guide me in making stylistic decisions. I think right now having long hair is a plus because I am not bald or very gray, so it makes me look slightly better for my age (even if “freakish” in some other ways). I may well change my style sooner or later, but when I do it shall be for reasons that I think are in my best interests, not to appease some normie prejudice real or imagined.
It's just that looks are not purely whimsical. People try to convey something of themselves by the way they look. What are you trying to convey ? The long hair could be justified (though it's very very long now) but the stumbling block is the beard far too shaggy and threatening :-)
Your employers may have googled you because you looked strange in the first place.
Well, if that's what my beard conveys then at least I have a symbol of aggression even though I have nothing else. Aggression can be attractive; total submission is definitely not the image I want to project.
When you have other resources such as money you can relax your appearance, but I have nothing else to work with.
And obviously the old advice to "get a haircut and a real job" is inapplicable to me due to the moral panic. No, I don't think they only googled me because of how I looked since my CV did not have a picture and I think it is always done in this sort of situation because of the huge cost of hiring the "wrong" person.
The Iranians finally put something sensible on a rocket:
https://t.me/Novichok_Rossiya_2/46810
A picture of Trump begging to open the Strait of Hormuz.
Which says everything about the situation he is in, reduced to a beggar.
Reparations to Iran are looking realistic and there is no way back to how it was before the war now. The balance of power will be changed to where if the West has a civilization left it will be clearly inferior.
Don't tell anyone about Marie-Louise O'Murphy, who became Louis XV's mistress at 14-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie-Louise_O%27Murphy .
FYI, she was his youngest "lesser mistress".
-Anonymous 2
Christians in Lebanon get in on the Epstein panic:
https://t.me/MasnoChat_2/438757
"We are at war with the Epstein people. The people eating, frying and raping kids. They are monsters, beasts. They are not humans. But the worst part is they are the ones that rule the world," said Ahmad.
Looks like this panic won't end until the people who "rule the world" are defeated, which is actually kind of sweet because they really are horrible people for different reasons, like their unwillingness to stick up for Epstein when he was wrongfully persecuted plus Trump still won't pardon Ghislaine Maxwell even after Michael Tracey brought so much attention to how shambolic her trial was.
"We are at war with the Epstein people. The people eating, frying and raping kids. They are monsters, beasts. They are not humans. But the worst part is they are the ones that rule the world," said Ahmad."
You think people like Ahmed would be a convincing new "elite" ?
Throwing the baby out (fried, roasted or stewed) never was good politics.
The Epstein mythology is a morale boost as good as any for the enemies of Western civilization, the very civilization that gave us feminist antisex bigotry which found its apotheosis in the Epstein myth. This belief that our leaders are child-cannibalizing pedophiles works possibly even better to stoke hate than assassinating their negotiators and heads of state and bombing their elementary schools, which is the only decisive military “victory” Trump has scored so far.
Our elites brought this hate upon themselves as they participated in the witch-hunt against Epstein and themselves. Because they are so absurdly wrapped up in antisex bigotry they STILL have no interest in deflecting even the most insane conspiracy theories because none of that can be worse than consensual sex with a teen anyway in their worldview. With so rotten leaders I honestly don’t see how we can do any worse. So yes, I welcome any of the factions in the Middle East (except the Zionists) as our new elite. There is no way they will be as sex-hostile as the "Epstein class" that they fight based on a silly misunderstanding which is immaterial to the real differences.
I feel so bad for Mette-Marit. Normies have no way to defend themselves against this. They're stuck in the mental prison of anti-sex hysteria. Epstein was obviously a playboy that surrounded himself with beautiful young women, and MM assumed (probably rightly) that he got in trouble because he didn't check or didn't care that a few of them were underage.
The insanity is that anti-sex hysteria has gotten so powerful that it seems to even erase memory now! 15 years ago, it was not a given that merely maintaining a friendship with someone convicted of sex with a teenager would be a blasphemous act, yet everyone acts like this would be self-evident. The old excuse of "it was a different time" does not work anymore. To be a good (or even acceptable) person, you are apparently supposed to preemptively adopt the moral hysterias of the future! What can a poor normie do when faced with such superstitions? They don't even realize the trap they're in...
Thanks for this insightful comment about MM. I feel sorry for her too because it seems she is honestly unable to see the rational way out, which is to point out it was a different time plus all he did wrong was not carefully check the young women’s IDs plus paying for sex which is still not universally considered a crime even today. Being misled about age can still work as a legal excuse too like it did for Epstein on everything but the “soliciting prostitution” charge, which is literally his only actual criminal record. It should be painfully obvious that this is worth pointing out, that the constant labeling of Epstein as a convicted pedophile/abuser/trafficker is factually false.
But the antisex hysteria has taken hold to the extent that she is blind to the entire pathway of confronting or minimizing the supposed scandal. Epstein MUST be a horrible man, no debate about it. So what she does is double down and now claim she saw him engage in blackmail or extortion. Her thinking is that if she can convince us that Epstein is such a horrible monster that he even groomed and manipulated her, she can be excused, so she joins in on accusing him some more. Since she isn’t providing any details of the supposed extortion she witnessed, we can’t take this as serious evidence, not least because she is unqualified to judge what is legally blackmail or business anyway even if she saw something she now honestly thinks was illegal.
Well, that was quick. Norway already cutting environmental taxes from gasoline and diesel fuel courtesy of Epstein's Fury:
https://www.dn.no/politikk/stortinget-vedtok-flere-pumpekutt-regjeringen-overkjort/2-1-1966678
I am shocked that our otherwise so climate-obsessed politicians intervened so soon to help some of the world's wealthiest people get a little cheaper energy, but it goes to show this is serious, and just the faintest beginning of the economic disaster if this war continues, which it looks like it will for a long time. This kind of relief won't really fix it either because the problem will come back to bite us in many other ways.
Maybe there is poetic justice after all and the antisex bigots will suffer for making their war against sexuality the primary purpose of this civilization. I don't think they will regret it or connect the dots that they did anything wrong, but they will have real problems getting in the way of continuing their witch-hunt.
Eivind, I’d like to ask…
What’s your opinion on climate change?
I think climate change is probably real, but we have no way to do anything about it without collapsing the economy. As confirmed by these frantic efforts to help us burn the same level of fossil fuels when we get a free gift to reduce them.
Im glad Im not the only one who has noticed how many of these epstien hating conspiracy theorists seem CONVINCED that pedophiles eat children. The amount of times ive heard a varation of “the rich and powerful elite pedos are killing and eating children”. This is a witch hunt, not “morality” and it has jack shit to do with “protecting children” and never was to begin with, its about policing sexuality and having a scapegoat to blame all the worlds problems on. We are no differnet from the gays and jews and blacks of the past.
We arent even human to them, we are demons from the pits of hell who reap legal minors souls, through the evil, ungodly, terrifying, traumatizing, life ruining act of…handjobs and ass eating? Lol. Mind you, thats all that this so called “life ruining traumatizing child sex abuse/torture” is. The children arent getting stabbed, no ones drinking their blood, no ones eating their organs, yet someone under 18 merely touching a legal adults penis or someone 18+ touching the legal minors penis is considered a far worse fate than even death itself.(you dont even have to touch the legal minors penis, merely looking at a photo of the minors penis is enough to telepathically “traumatize” the minor. Also, I cant wait till society stops taking this “trauma” shit seriously and tells people to fucking get over themselves, but as long as the “life ruining handjob” narritive continues the “trauma” narritive will as well.) We are witches practicing witchcraft, not human beings having sex. Even questioning the narritive will get you called a pedo, because a pedo is just a witch, someone who deviates or appears to deviate from the established norm, no matter how little, no matter how stupid and ridiculous said norms are, someone to blame for all the worlds evils, a witch.
Eivind, I saw a tiktok video of a woman complaining that “minors can be pedos too” and how gross and stinky and evil teen boys are for having younger girlfriends. Funny how a teen boy is an evil predator that deserves to be tortured or murder and should be held to adult standards and have adult responsibility when it comes to sex and consent when they are sexually involved with a younger kid, but are innocent little children who cant be held responsible or held to adult standards for sexuality or consent and must be protected from “harm” at all costs if they are sexually involved with someone older.
The comments also said that “normal” teenagers are attracted to adults, yet those same people will claim that a teenager has to be “groomed” into finding adults attractive if a teen displays interest in/dates an adult. I also saw so many “teens arent children and are young adults/almost adults who should be treated as such”, yet if that same teenagers takes a naked selfie they are a mere child again?
One comment complained “I overheard a 5th grader taking about their crush on a 1st grader” the replies? “oh hell no keep that creepy asshole away from little kids”. Mind you 5th graders are TEN. “5th graders know better at that age the cops should be called” but if that same 5th grader got involved with an adult they suddenly wouldnt “know better”??
The funniest one, a person saying two year age gaps are fine and anyone who complains about it is ridculous, a couple comments down “two year age gaps are creepy and 14 and 16 is literal grooming”, both comments had a decent amount of likes, that made me lol. Good news is that people are still entering age gap relationships despite the hysteria, but jesus christ.
And no one will question the discrepancy of teen boys being evil sexually predatory young adults that must be murdered and tortured for their sins while simultaneously being innocent asexual children who are by default victims of any sexual encounter and have to be “groomed” into any sexual activity. There always has to be a “predator” in age gap/youth sex, it can never just be sex to these fuckers, there has to be a “victim” and a “predator” even if the roles assigned are contradictory(like with teenage boys)
Yeah, the whole edifice of the CSA hoax is full of these contradictions. 10-year-olds are incredibly innocent except they can be abusers too depending on which way they look. There is always this mythical “harm” which must be blamed on someone when there is an age gap more than two years or so and you don’t even have to get any older to go from “victim” to “predator.” You would think having such erratic boundaries would get annoying to the normies, that they violate the Golden Rule because you can never be quite sure that you stay in the protected class for long, but the normies seem to love being so intolerant.
It is tempting to think our civilization has morally declined, isn’t it? But I am reminded by John Michael Greer when he replied to a comment this week with:
The decline of a civilization isn’t a moral decline, although it often involves the replacement of some kinds of wickedness with others. Nonetheless it’s a real thing.
We haven’t exactly morally declined because it was plenty immoral to have lynchings of Black men and persecution of homosexuals and such that we had at our civilization’s peak, but we have replaced some kinds of wickedness with others. The normies confuse that with moral progress because they are blind to the current kind of wickedness, but we who recognize the CSA hoax for the wickedness that it is shouldn’t confuse it with moral decline either, just cultural drift into different kinds of oppression.
The real cultural decline is what we are seeing in reduced resilience to crises such as the Iran war. It is different this time because with exceeding complexity things now break more easily and we can’t rebuild so easily either as we did after WWII for example because our resource base is much more depleted.
Yes. You can be a victim AND a predator to yourself as well. Teen girls are arrested for possessing “csam” of THEMSELVES. Punishing the evil predatory 16 year old adult woman for taking “sexually abusive” photos of an innocent 16 year old child. Pedo teens are another thing. On one hand, if the 16 year old hangs out with fellow pedos, he is an innocent kid in “danger” of being “harmed” by our evil adult sexual deviancy, but if he hangs out with other minors, he is magically an evil predator again who must be killed, to protect kids of course!
So many “if that was my son I would kill him” so much for wanting to protect innocent 16 year old children from harm and dangerous adults and only hating pedos for “child protection”. Unless they genuinely believe murdering a 16 yr old is less harmful than sucking a 16 yr olds dick, which they seem to actually unironically believe.
I also saw so many “im 15 and have a 13 year old friend, am I a groomer?” “Is this age gap allowed?” “Should I stop talking to her?” These kids are so paranoid and hysterical that they dont even feel safe being PLATONIC FRIENDS with people a grade or two younger than them for fear of being “groomers”, I almost feel bad for them till I realize that these are the same kids hatecriming their classmates over the same behavior.
I wouldn't say our civillization has morally declined, humans have always done this. Do you know what an “octoroon” is? An octoroon is a person who is 1/8th black, and because of that, they were enslaved. Imagine that, a blond haired blue eyed pale white girl in shackles and being classified as a “negro” because a grandparent was part black.
The normies constantly change the rules, on purpose, so that there will always be “deviants” who break those rules and thus “deserve” the full wrath of society. Like how one minute, pedophillia is about “power and control” not about physical attraction, so if you fall in love with a 17 year old who looks 18 you are a pedo despite her looking like an adult woman. But if you are Dan and date Shauna Rae(search up “shauna rae boyfriend” and read all the comments), pedophillia just becomes about physical attraction and is no longer about “power and control”, so you are still a pedo for dating an adult woman with dwarfism.
Poor Dan, him and his family were getting sent death threats and getting nonstop global coverage for “finding a loophole”. Even if the csa bullshit was true and legal minors were harmed from any close relationship with legal adults, shouldnt a “loophole” be good to the normies? Since she is a legal adult and therefore cant get any penis trauma or blowjob brain injuries? Nope! Because its not about your actions, its about the very fact that your sexuality appears to deviate from the established norms. It was never about protecting children from harm, its about controlling peoples sex lives. Shauna Rae is/was in her 20s and so was Dan. So whats the “power dynamic?” Whats the “power and control?” Whats the “maturity gap?”. Yet Dan still got attacked by the violent mob and was forced to break up with his girlfriend and was branded as a predator. Why? Because the antis hatred of pedophillia has jack shit to do with wanting to “protect” anyone of any age. They are just slimey bigots, identical the bigots of the past that they hate on for doing the exact same shit they do today.
I have also always been convinced mankind has undergone no moral progress. Replacement of one kind of evil with another is indeed what has been happening since the dawn of time.
Ha! Take a look at this Eivind…
https://mymodernmet.com/sophia-park-bar-exam/
https://www.npr.org/2024/11/29/nx-s1-5208463/california-teen-makes-history-as-the-youngest-to-pass-state-bar-exam
“17-Year-Old Becomes Youngest Person Ever To Pass the California Bar Exam”
Can a minor teen girl pass the rigorous, grueling California bar exam and get sworn as the newest deputy district attorney?
Oh absolutely!
Can she have a sex with an older adult?
No.
Why not?
Well, idiot normie cucks will accuse her of being “groomed” if she ever reciprocated sexual feelings towards an older individual.
But not “groomed” into becoming a literal prodigy and probably being offered to join MENSA’s high-IQ honor society, right? At what age do you think this girl and her siblings were taught and encouraged to play the violin?
“Teen Brain Myth” lol.
There would be a little bit of consistency if California had a rigorous, grueling exam that 17-year-olds could take to prove that they have the capacity to consent to sex with anybody. But no state will allow such proof because their CSA dogma postulates a metaphysical handicap of the child/teen brain which cannot be falsified in this world no natter the evidence that they know what they are doing. Hence the notion of child prodigy is subject to sex-exceptionalism and cannot exist in the sexual realm, except if they themselves are raping and abusing, in which case they become magically competent anyway. I guess this double standard and the categorical exclusion of any sexual precociousness in a positive sense is just a brute fact about the metaphysical badness of sexuality which is beyond my comprehension because I failed to get indoctrinated along with the normies.
As we head for catastrophe due to the Iran war if you want to understand how bad it will get ahead of time I recommend listening Nate Hagens. He won't be talking sense about Epstein or the CSA hoax but he does understand energy and the system complexities that are now getting destroyed:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fcnfa_B0r5E
He was one of the peak oil gang along with Gail Tverberg and John Michael Greer, and now will be their belated moment to have their predictions come true. I think it won't be as bad as Gail predicted but Nate Hagens is right on and Greer might be a bit too optimistic about the future.
A 4 year old has an iq of 156 and got accepted into Mensa, of course despite being intellectually developed enough to get into literal fucking Mensa, he is too retarted to even BEGIN to understand the complex, highly intellectual, mature, complex complexities of feeling on a womans boob or getting his penis touched and wont even BEGIN to understand the highly mature intellectual complexities of boob groping and penis touching till midnight of his 18th birthday(if even then, since even young adults cant consent and can be groomed nowadays), because genital groping and orgasms are just THAT complex and intellectual and complicated and mature, more mature and intellectual and complex than some silly little Mensa, which even a mere toddler can get into
Speaking of contradictions, there’s a quote I read online or in a book (don’t remember where exactly) that basically stated that we (as a society and culture) only care about the “innocence” of the child more than the actual “child” figure himself.
In other words, their “innocence” technically overrides their fundamental existence since what truly matters to the normies at this point is to maintain the dogma they so desperately want to keep alive.
Obviously the only way these comments make any sense is when they are understood from the point of view of an older woman who wants to punish men as harshly as possible for sexually pursuing her younger competition instead of her older ass.
anon69
That's right, she can understand complex legal game theory, but the moment she threatens older women with her pussy, she can't understand the old in-out.
anon69
anon69 brings in the female sexual trade union again, but once again it contradicts my experience. To my knowledge all the people pushing my cancellation were men while two women (the NAV representatives) were skeptical.
The STU hypothesis as primary driver of antisex bigotry does not survive a meeting with reality, not if you go out in the world as a proud pro-sex advocate like I have done, in which case you will experience the most hate coming from men.
Here’s a thought experiment to ponder how it really works. Imagine all the current humans being replaced with new people while the CSA hoax and associated moral panics continue. This has already halfway happened; since the 1970s when the CSA hoax got started we’ve had something like a 50% turnover of people.
Now, does it make sense to speak of the cultural antisex norms being caused by the internal motivations of the people, for example older women’s jealousy towards the young? It should be obvious that they get these ideas from the culture rather than within, since not all cultures have these ideas. The CSA hoax and our hateful sex laws came about by cultural drift and are now supported equally by men and are in my experience more aggressively driven by men. So the STU hypothesis is false and we need to face the fact that the entire culture is our enemy.
If I were on track to improving my socioeconomic status to the level of a normie, I would be very upset right now about Trump's idiotic war already causing national emergencies in the places I would like to go to improve my life:
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/27/world/video/phillipines-fuel-protest-vrtc-digvid
But since I have no prospects of making a living until I get an old-age pension in 20 years and it's too late anyway I can just grab some popcorn, sit back and watch the normies have their way of life destroyed.
The future will suck even if you have money, since that won't help with physical shortages and chaos. It will be a dreary more or less Mad Max scenario where you also have to elbow your way (or worse) to get the essentials of life. It takes more than money to be competitive in such an environment and these "protests" won't help either since Trump is now powerless to end the war on his terms and there is only so much governments can do to help their citizens in a global crisis.
I have 800k on the stock exchange. I am a bit stressed about what's happening right now but I am not unduly worried. I am more concerned about private matters, like will my sole surviving brother die before me (an leave me to take care of my mother?). Geopolitically, I think countries have learnt to kick the can down the road. I'd like Trump to pull the nuclear trigger. Sanitize Iran and the Houtih part of Yemen. Leave only deserts that can do no harm to shipping. I have zero empathy left for the muslim unwashed who reproduce like rabbits and build underground missile caches. I have gained more sympathy for the reviled "Jews" over the last few years.
That’s an interesting take, Jack, and I can see how you hold out hope for a nuclear option to help you enjoy your wealth before you die. My experience (even apart from the wealth aspect) is nonetheless increased sympathy for the Muslims seeing the atrocities committed against them in recent years and now a complete failure to negotiate with them in good faith either.
And then there’s the straight-up impressive military prowess of the Iranians. Even their AI slop is impressive, and sexy too with these young girls holding up “Epstein Files”:
https://t.me/MasnoChat_2/440429
Iran’s AI propaganda video masterclass
Iranian media, IRGC-affiliated channels, influencer networks and independent content creators are flooding social media with a stream of polished, emotionally powerful and hilarious AI-generated videos, with some surely destined to be featured in future documentaries and lectures on the history of the current conflict.
Far from the AI slop content that we’ve all become used to, many of the videos serve as effective propaganda in the best sense of the word - the dissemination and deliberation of info and ideas to put forward Iran’s case in the face of US-Israeli aggression.
The clips feature:
-- regular references to Baal, (https://t.me/geopolitics_prime/64583) the devil-horned demon of Western occult tradition associated with child sacrifice, which Iran effectively declared war on in February amid the publication of the Epstein files
-- abundant references to the files themselves, (correctly) framing the war as an existential struggle between Iran and the global Epstein class
-- multiple videos making reference to the brutal double tap attack on an Iranian girls school on day 1 of the war
"abundant references to the files themselves, (correctly) framing the war as an existential struggle between Iran and the global Epstein class
"correctly" ! What a moron !
@jack
"Leave only deserts that can do no harm to shipping".
Well if that's what you want to do to those who might hinder your capacity to pay for sexual service, you shouldn't be surprised when your ennemies decide to annihilate you.
"But since I have no prospects of making a living until I get an old-age pension"
Working is not an option for you ?
Yes, the Epstein panic is a moronic belief held by both sides. But the upshot is a myth not just larger than life but having next to nothing to do with life and now amplified into a clash of civilizations.
The myth is real as a myth and this is what counts. It is our version of the Homeric epic tradition or something like that, and ours is also an oral tradition at this point spread by a million talking heads who each talk bullshit (except Michael Tracey) which coalesces into the Zeitgeist of Epstein which defines our time and represents (I hope) the beginning of the end of this antisexual civilization, which is so stupid it still persecutes itself over the Epstein panic even as it is attacked by an ultimately stronger enemy who is capitalizing on the Epstein myth to bring us down.
To the idiots on the "Epstein class" side we can now also count Sam Harris:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=985H6h0e7JA
Not the first time he has promoted the CSA hoax, so I'm not surprised and always disliked him even before I could put my finger on quite how morally revolting and intellectually bankrupt Sam Harris is.
Nope, working is literally not an option at least for as long as I'm on the wrong side of a still ongoing moral panic. I can't change the fact that I picked sides publicly even if I wanted to.
Det er lite som provoserer meg så mye som disse to klovnene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnMd5H-O_Pc&t=44s
With no criminal record I think you can get a job. Even convicted sex offenders get jobs (though with great difficulty and it takes time). In your case you could even change your name and that will make it more difficult for employers to link your views. But it seems legally they aren't allowed to discriminate based on political views in Norway according to what the AI tells me? I get sometimes they will anyway without telling you, but this gives leverage and means some won't bring it up, some companies (mainly smaller or medium sized ones probably) do sloppy background checks anyway.
It might be hard to get a job without an accredited course though, which is why you should probably take legal action against the school that fucked you over. It's probably even worth it just to end up back on the course, get the certificate who cares if you hate them and they hate you.
"Again, all I know is that whether STU is 10% of the cause of our plight, they make up 90% of the NGOs and lobbyists who are making 99% of the laws that are causing us hell and leading us into the abyss."
anon69
“But no state will allow such proof because their CSA dogma postulates a metaphysical handicap of the child/teen brain which cannot be falsified in this world no natter the evidence that they know what they are doing. Hence the notion of child prodigy is subject to sex-exceptionalism and cannot exist in the sexual realm, except if they themselves are raping and abusing, in which case they become magically competent anyway. I guess this double standard and the categorical exclusion of any sexual precociousness in a positive sense is just a brute fact about the metaphysical badness of sexuality which is beyond my comprehension because I failed to get indoctrinated along with the normies.”
And thus, if you try to argue these points to a normie, suddenly the “Intellectual ability” argument shifts to “emotional maturity” . Like, doesn’t the role of being a defense attorney already require someone to be stoic and composed?
If she already has the intelligence capacity and social skills to become a lawyer, then surely every other normie excuse becomes flaccid now?
Obviously, no solid rebuttal (regardless of how surefire it is) will ever satisfy them.
I don't think anyone here has yet mentioned Dezi Freeman - perhaps because the media - despite widely publicizing his case today - tried to bury the truth. Dezi Freeman was on the run after killing 2 police officers 7 months ago. He has sadly just been killed by the police following a shootout with them. What the media buried beneath the headlines is that the reason he killed 2 police officers was because they came to his property to serve him a warrant to search it for historical sex offences. Interestingly they usually put sex offences on the headlines, but when it's someone actually fighting back against the feminist state they try to bury it at the bottom of the article? Instead they blame him for being a conspiracy theorist as if that were a crime?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c93e4gxn22wo
Dezi Freeman is a martyr, may his soul rest in peace!
Unfortunately, men accused of sex crimes cannot much resist arrest in countries where getting a firerarm is very difficult and as little as owning one get you a stiff jail sentence. Otherwise given the high likelyhood of getting the death penalty (being killed in jail), dying with all guns blazing like Sadam's sons is the best option.
Somebody suggested changing my name to get a job. I course I won’t do this because I am a proud activist. What I will do is link my blog prominently on my CV to weed out employers who have a problem with it, so they won’t waste my time before discovering my heresies their own and having a moral panic attack. This is the rational way to deal with having unpopular opinions: don’t try to hide them in any way, which I never did, but I did not display them prominently enough to avoid timewasters either.
RIP Dezi Freeman. A hero and martyr and maybe saint, I must say more wholesome than Nathan Larson because Freeman didn’t just passively suffer but fought back valiantly and for once the pain is not all on our side.
I agree with Jack, Saddam’s sons were role models too. Their last stand impressed me mightily at the time.
That war was also a quagmire for the US, but Iran will be incomparably worse because this time business as usual for industrial civilization is on the line, or at any rate what is left of it will be channeled away from the US and Europe. I don’t even think there will be another refugee crisis because Europe will be in too bad shape to be worth fleeing to.
There is not one day that goes by without a (sometimes pretty) teacher being arrested for "assaulting" a male student:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/kentucky-teacher-mary-mattingly-sexually-200502707.html
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/ex-jersey-teacher-ashley-fisler-232844393.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/wisconsin-teacher-arrested-child-sex-154141157.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall
I am now convinced such female sex offenders are, at least in the US, now more than collateral damage to the persecution of males. Neither are they mere victims of the "badness of sex" or of "cultural drift". Their numbers and the absurdly high sentences they receive, are indicative of something more acute. They are being punished by the STU for handing out sex for free (for cheapening the commodity that gives women a stranglehold on Society).
I can believe that the female sex offender charade is predominantly accused by women, before the whole system picks up and grinds up these nice women who give sex to boys, while the only noticeable resistance is the invariable “I wish I were so lucky” comments from men who otherwise do nothing to stop the persecution.
We live in a sick culture where persecuting victimless sexuality is simply what we do because it is our culture. Yes, it “benefits” some groups (old hags) and hurts other groups (boys and men and the occasional woman), but it happens because it is our culture, just like other cultures had or have human sacrifice or genital mutilation. Ours is a kind of behavioural genital mutilation. Recall many years ago we discussed a paper by Roy Baumeister titled “Cultural Suppression of Female Sexuality” where he blames such suppression including genital mutilation on women in order to drive up the price of sex. He literally blames it on the STU without using that acronym.
Very well, that’s not completely wrong, but we know that genital mutilation or the persecution of female teachers or the rest of the CSA hoax are not necessary features of culture. The difference between a culture with one or more of these rituals and one without is not female psychology but cultural drift. It is therefore unhelpful to blame women because from their point of view they just do what the culture dictates, with lots of help from men anyway, so how can we frame it as a battle of the sexes as a practical matter for activism to end these barbaric practices?
Experience tells me that we can’t! Women are right that they are merely following the culture. So we need to see the entire culture as our enemy and act accordingly, for example by awarding sexualist medals of honor to men like Dezi Freeman who fought OTHER MEN whom I viscerally detest as our enemy because they represent THE CULTURE, not women in particular.
Perhaps this is difficult for y’all to see because you are not a literal outsider and pariah like me and instead lead a double life where you also get the benefits of being a normie, but to me it is obvious. Society hates my guts and I requite them with appropriate feelings.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Hsg7kqoi0pE
Meta is now facing a “sextortion scheme” lawsuit.
15-year-old boy commits suicide after “sextortion.” That’s obviously a bad outcome, but is the metaphysical badness of sex to blame? How about we tell kids that nudes are harmless and they don’t ever have to pay any money to prevent them from being spread. That way they can be immunized against sextortion without making the Internet even less free than it is today.
I listened to the entire interview with those bereaved parents and now activists for “safety” on social media without seeing any hint that this (to me) obvious solution is visible to their consciousness at all. Instead they just want to double down on the idea that sex and nudity is incredibly harmful and we need to ramp up the censorship and control. All told I can’t have any sympathy for such activists because they are part of the problem.
“Instead they just want to double down on the idea that sex and nudity is incredibly harmful and we need to ramp up the censorship and control.”
That reminds me of this other video.
https://youtu.be/alqpa9ZxRb0
Displaying "dirty" magazines next to bananas in a convenience store is scary to the residents of Bald Knob because "think of the children," huh? I wish that sort of panic could be consigned to the parody that it looks like, but it only got worse. At this point the magazines are probably well hidden from view, but there is always something new, like the age verification creeping into our digital platforms and why not convenience stores too because there might be dirty magazines on the premises.
Even Linux is about to fall to age verification!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud7NEaHKP-k
Never in a million years could I imagine that a simple photo of a nude woman is “harmful” to children.
Let that sink in…nudity is inherently “damaging” to young minds.
Nevermind the impoverished African tribes whose women walk around topless everyday or how the vast majority of our human species spent thousands of years with minimal clothing (or nothing at all really).
Surely, the glimpse of a titty nipple will cause the -18s to gouge their eyes out with a boxcutter?
Let’s ask ourselves, are any kids gonna give a shit about a raunchy magazine on display or not? If it bothers us so much, why don’t ask the “kids” if it bothers them too?
We will never know since this particular convenience store in Arkansas closed in 2020 as a result of the pandemic.
Being “harmed” by beauty is the ultimate absurdity, but this is precisely CSA dogma and there is nothing like the female sex offender charade to help us analyze the distilled madness of the normies. Yes, seeing sexy sights and enjoying female beauty is inverted into “harm” because the normies believe in inverted qualia where there is apparent delight and excitement. Inverted qualia might be real sometimes but only for inconsequential sensations such as colors. It is possible to that my blue could be perceived the same as your green and vice versa, but we never notice because we use the same words to talk about the same things in the external world. This doesn’t work so well for pleasure and pain because they are associated with very different behaviors, aversion versus attraction. So the normies must postulate epiphenomenalism in addition to inverted qualia, where children’s sexual pleasure is inverted to pain and also reduced to an epiphenomenon where the causal link between emotion and behavior is missing, so they can’t tell you that they are actually tormented and traumatized when they seem pleasured and willing, until they turn 18 and can tell you the “true” story about how horrible it was and how they are now damaged for life.
This is a more refined view than hypothesizing that minors are philosophical sexual zombies as I have suggested before, because it accounts for inverted qualia rather than just the missing qualia of a philosophical zombie. Either way, you do end up with a rather monstrous view of what people are like before they reach the magical age where we can treat them as human because their emotions are what they seem and we can take them at their word when they tell you that they enjoy something and want it. If the normies were willing to engage rationally they would need to come up with some bizarre assumptions like I have made above and either swallow or reject them, but they usually shut down all but hysterical thinking long before they can get into any analytic philosophy, so they never notice how insane the CSA hoax is. And furthermore they cancel all who engage rationally so there is no one left to start a debate, except Stephen Kershnar, not for lack of trying to cancel him too but because he has tenure. Kershnar being an ethicist asks what is the “WRONGMAKER” in minor-adult sex? He honestly can’t find any. The burden is on the normies to come up with a wrongmaker, because what they have now sure isn’t convincing to anybody who thinks about it rationally.
That said, I actually DO believe in a wrongmaker in making pornography excessively available to children (and adult men for that matter), but it has nothing to do with inverted qualia or the “CSA” kind of “harm.” Rather, I believe pornography is bad because sex is too good to miss out on. Pornography is not sex and it gets in the way of seeking and enjoying real sex as one should and it makes boys and men more or less impotent in real situations, so I do believe in having a restrictive attitude to pornography, but not so insanely restrictive that children can’t see dirty magazine covers or peruse the magazines either as any boy traditionally would. I don’t think any boy got impotent from Playboy and that sort of thing since the printed material simply isn’t so compelling that it sucks up too much of your libido; it is digital porn that is truly harmful and can act like an addiction because of the unlimited novelty that it provides.
Gail Tverberg has weighed in on the war and she is also rooting for Iran, but for a somewhat surprising reason:
https://ourfiniteworld.com/2026/04/02/losing-the-iran-war-may-be-the-best-outcome-for-the-world/
The outcome outlined in Figure 1 implies that Donald Trump and the US-Israel coalition will lose the war against Iran. It appears that the physics of the situation (or perhaps the Higher Power behind the physics of the situation) has chosen the flawed personality of Donald Trump to accomplish the required result. This is a situation where what seems to be the US losing in its conflict against Iran is actually winning for the overall world economy. If oil can be used more sparingly in the future by servicing people closer to where end products are made, the available energy resources will provide greater benefit to society as a whole.
It's a bit kooky to speak of a Higher Power working through Trump, but then the situation is so surreal that it almost makes more sense, especially if we take it as a metaphor for physics and in particular the Second Law of Thermodynamics, than to believe the world's greatest superpower elected such a deranged individual. If Trump's stupidity can help industrial civilization dissipate more energy via the rearrangement of the world economy and step down the ladder of collapse now taking place, perhaps there is a "purpose" to it after all.
It is definitely sure that we are not going back to the world of February 2026. The only question is how bad it will get how fast. Gail has somewhat given up her predictions of fast collapse, but collapse we will.
I failed at life and am now assured to stay poor, but it makes me feel better that our civilization also failed at being a civilization at the same time. From my point of view of Shadenfreude and in light of Gail's view here I almost hope that Trump will go all in to "win" the war, but I get that it's more likely we will find a way to deglobalize and burn some more oil with the relative peacefulness required for that, since the Second Law does not want to let so much energy go undissipated.
I feel like we are back in the reign of Caligula. Seriously, Trump is so insane and showing it verbosely in his daily market manipulations and demented narcissistic speeches where he contradicts himself from sentence to sentence alternating between having already won and begging or threatening Europe to join the war and lying about negotiating with a nonexistent new Iranian regime who even offered him to be Supreme Leader. Either the world is now the playground of a madman, or two including Netanyahu plus their imaginary friend Epstein if you ask the normies because they went insane too, or a Higher Purpose is guiding world events like Gail suggests so we can empty the oil fields that are already pumping. If she is right that Iran requires a breakeven price of $124 per barrel then you can sense a force behind their current campaign (making the fact that they were attacked less relevant) driven by physics itself because the alternative would be deflationary collapse.
Against all expectations, Amos Lee has been released on bail.
https://www.amosyee.org/back.html
That's some rare good news! It is also evident that Amos has grown as a person and activist despite being imprisoned much of the time during his American exile. Now against threats form a judge that he can't comment on his case he is doing just that, plus speaking about overturning the dictator of Singapore and affirming his non-negotiable support for pedophiles too and several more worthy causes. He also says people on the streets of Singapore like him and Internet hate gives a distorted view.
Very refreshing to see a person who makes the world better despite all kinds of threats to himself and is ultimately rewarded for it too, though still not off the hook for more years in prison for refusing national service.
https://spectrumnews1.com/wi/milwaukee/news/2025/10/10/lily-peters--trial-date--murder--carson-berger-peters
More “innocent little children”, but you are not gonna believe the age of the murderer.
Peters-Berger, who was 14 at the time of the crime, is being tried in adult court, as anyone who is at least 10 years old and is accused of first- or second-degree homicide is considered an adult in Wisconsin’s court system.
Yes, I can't fathom why homicide is so much easier to understand and be held responsible for than sexual consent, but that's how it works.
On the other hand, geopolitics is now catching up with the CSA hoax in terms of how crazy it gets. We now live in a world where the POTUS speaks like this in his latest tweet or "Truth" as it's called on his platform:
Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran. There will be nothing like it!!! Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah. President DONALD J. TRUMP
Desperation and insanity and ultimate power all combined and no one is stopping him. Although that ultimate power is not what it used to be as the American empire is all over but the crying, plus dragging the whole world into an increasingly dark crisis. A crisis I was expecting because I am aware we are at peak energy, but it didn't have to happen right now as the world economy was humming along just fine until March 2026.
Female sex offender gets 52 years. https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/arizona-woman-gets-over-50-years-prison-sexual-assault-bestiality
We are truly living in the Twilight Zone when this was even a plea "bargain":
Smith was arrested in May 2025 and later pleaded guilty to child sex crimes and bestiality charges. As part of her plea agreement, Smith must serve every day of her prison sentence without the possibility of early release – she won't be eligible to be released from prison until 2077, at which point she would be placed on lifetime sex offender probation.
How can being ensured to stay in prison until she is 97 be somehow better than the risk of a jury trial which at least has a theoretical chance of acquittal, maybe for a technicality like a legal mistake if not finding a sensible person on the jury? No, this is what is called learned helplessness where animals who are punished no matter what they do quit trying to avoid pain. The hate against sex offenders has gone so far that they just roll over without a fight because they expect life is over anyway.
Also note how the Fox10 article there screams a “Warning: The details in the story below are graphic” yet fails to provide any graphic details. This is a hallmark of witch-hunts as the label (nothing more descriptive than “sex act” and “sexual fantasies”) is what makes it graphic, never mind that it was probably an affectionate sex act because it is the metaphysical badness of sex which counts. There is nothing in the story which suggests anything other than affection or tries to demonstrate that there was any actual harm, but because it can be classified as sexual affection it so “obviously” deserves life in prison (which is somehow still merciful since she can get out at 97) that they don’t need to tell us what it was she did or how the “victim” felt about it at the same time as the sexual label itself is so incredibly scary that it requires a warning because this is the witchcraft of our times.
The normies have outsourced their thinking to witch-doctors and are fine with that; they don’t need any more details or see anything patronizing about reporting it with no facts and a trigger warning at the same time.
Also note the elevation of bestiality which is now on a par with pedophilia in metaphysical badness -- what was the “sex act” she did with the service dog, did she allow him to hump her or what and how was the dog harmed exactly?
And as always, it concludes with a call for escalation because 52 years in prison is still too lenient:
"Crimes such as these are shocking and will never be tolerated in Yavapai County. People who choose to sexually abuse children or animals are incredibly dangerous and cannot be reformed," Yavapai County Attorney Dennis McGrane said. "I hope this case motivates the Arizona Legislature to allow juries to impose the death penalty in cases where an adult sexually assaults a child. Doing so would allow appropriate punishment for anyone who chooses to rape a child and will deter others from committing these heinous crimes."
How exactly was this case so motivating for more punishment again? What are we missing to be able to conclude like that? Are you seriously saying that affection is so bad just because it is sexual?
Articles like these (at least to me), highlight the excessive overpunishment given to sex offenders. This idea that people aren’t considered “human” anymore once they are convicted of a sex crime is the accepted norm at this point.
It’s both insane and “inane” to me of how expendable sex offenders are to the system. Decades behind bars are as easy as slapping a sticker on someone’s face or handing out candy on Halloween.
On top of that, there’s this intrinsic belief that females are supposed to be treated nicer when sentenced, but here we are in this kind of world, where the sheriff is calling for the death of this woman since we are not allowed to think of anything less than that whatsoever.
This isn’t just an Arizona thing—we are truly living in sex-exceptionalistic times.
People like Dennis obviously are never gonna say anything less than “death”, (cop, duh) even if that kind of punishment is ridiculous and well exceeds the absurdity of the crime, let alone the vast majority of sentences.
Most second-degree murders get decades less and even a shot at parole. Sex offenders don’t get that since society can’t wrap their heads around anything other than sex being the “evil of all evil”. You see what I mean?
Post a Comment