While I support the right to be anonymous on the Internet, stories like this go to show it is pointless, really. Personally, I chose to blog under my full name not only because anonymity is futile but because I believe activism is more effective that way and I am in no way ashamed of my opinions. So I engage in open hostility against feminists and their enforcers. I have nothing to lose and nothing to fear. I don't have to watch my back because I currently do nothing illegal (even took the above picture myself, so no copyright infringement in this post), and I am positively itching for a lethal confrontation anyway, seething with rage and profound hatred against pigs as my life is destroyed by feminism.
These days a new Orwellian law is being pushed through in Norway (Datalagringsdirektivet), granting the police tremendously increased power to pry into our lives. Information on all email, web browsing and telecommunications of the entire populace is to be stored for the convenience of cops. Note that everyone is presumed guilty and subject to surveillance by default; this is not a matter of keeping an eye on suspects. While this is of course appalling and incompatible with any notion of a free society, I don't fear Datalagringsdirektivet, either. A transparent society suits me just fine and is bound to be a net positive for men. In stark contrast to the pigs, I take the moral high ground. Since a cornerstone of police method is deception, openness is going to hurt law enforcement a great deal more than it will hurt morally upstanding citizens (and besides, anyone who actually knows how to use a computer can easily get around the new surveillance anyway if the need should arise). Pigs have been known to engage in their usual lies and sneaky behavior on social media, but at least one major service has made it clear that this is unacceptable.
Facebook was the only company to make clear that its strict policies against fake accounts apply to law enforcement as well. In its 2008 and 2009 guides it notes that it will disable all accounts that provide false or misleading information, including police accounts, and in its 2010 guide it notes that it will “always disable accounts that supply false or misleading profile information or attempt to technically or socially circumvent site privacy measures.”Kudos to Facebook for holding cops to the same standards as everyone else. As feminism and its enforcement cannot stand the light of day, the powers that be are only hastening their own demise be escalating surveillance. The truth will set us free.
217 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 217 of 217What's naive is thinking it is possible to discuss love and intimacy with you, Eivind.
So obviously your pain is connected to the perceived injustice, and is not some sort of a physiological reaction to lack of sex.
It is both. They are not mutually exclusive. Just like someone voluntarily starving himself would have a physiological reaction of hunger. But he would only have reason to be angry at other people if they were responsible. Men deprived of sex due to feminism have reason to aggress even if some other people voluntarily undergo the same amount of sexual deprivation.
You are the one who said love is never a response to intimacy, which is the most naive statement I ever heard on the subject.
Sorry, different Anonymous. (Blimey, we're almost back on topic!)
Even a girl here disagreed with you. I am now talking to her, and it's not a result of adopting your ridiculous worldview.
Are you absolutely sure it's a girl? Remember the famous New Yorker cartoon: on the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog.
You do have some very precise observations Eivind, you just don't seem to know what to do about them afterwards. What you should be doing isn't blowing up something or raping someone (duh), it's using your head to formulate good theory that others can enact. That's your talent in life, not beating up Bergen's police force. That's only going to happen in your head. Everyone can see feminism has fucked up the Western countries at this point, alls I'm saying is if you're really that hellbent on killing and raping instead of political debate and reform, maybe you should consider converting to Islam instead.
Hanne Herland has some interesting points. Norwegian men have started marrying "traditional" women in droves in marriages that are as successful or more successful than others, and while Norwegian women marry foreign men, they do so a lot less frequently, and these marriages rarely last. So in 10-20 years time, Norway will contain a lot of bitter old women, probably more than men, so it turns out today's society isn't the women's utopia you try to make it out as. Lots of foreign women want Norwegian men simply because even if some are useless, most aren't, and word gets around. Maybe if you tried to see things a bit more from the female perspective, people would sympathise more with your situation too.
It's weird that despite your undying hatred for feminism, most of your theories are shockingly similar to those of radical feminist nutbars, Andrea Dworkin and Catherine MacKinnon.
Especially your creepy obsession with rape.
Happy Women's Day.
There has been a bit of a Nice Guy(tm) discussion in the feminist blogosphere lately, which is amusing to the extent that it solves the problem not posed by weak men. To get women sexually interested, men will either learn to perform, or they will learn to TAKE. Since Nice Guys (tm) can't do either, feminists have nothing to worry about from them, but for some reason Omega male whining on the Internet has to be punished by mockery...to go along with the lack of sex.
Right, but I see Eivind (and Sodini, although I think Eivind is smarter and not suicidal) as the natural endpoint of the process of pricing men out of sexuality. While enough men will become involuntary monks like me, enough will become suicide terrorists to keep life interesting. I think Eivind has been rather stupid in outing himself as a rape apologist, because it allows others to shout him down, but having used Game to claw myself up to 7 lifetime sex partners (the average, apparently) as a visibly severely disabled man, by approaching hundreds of women a year for roughly a decade, my thoughts tend towards the asceticism of "all flesh is grass." True, I got to engage in a normal part of human experience while having a body as hot as Toulouse-Lautrec's, without his genius, but I agree with Eivind. It's just that he wants to advocate for and enact dead-end actions whereas I don't.
True, I got to engage in a normal part of human experience while having a body as hot as Toulouse-Lautrec's
What, a cock so massive that you're nicknamed "the tripod"?
Well, I'm only small in stature (and artistic talent.)
Seriously, very few men, dwarfs included, are going to react favorably to "Well, you better not want what you want." And I say that as a natural ascetic, someone who has not physically felt the hungers of the flesh overmuch in the past year.
Hello Eivind.
No kidding, when i heard the news of the Oslo shooter, the first thing running through my mind was that you had gone Sodini. Anyway, could you give your views on the matter, it's a while since you updated your blog.
Hehe, it wasn't me this time. Since I got a girlfriend as a result of this blog (she started posting as "Emma" in this very thread, though her real name is Nataliya, and now we are in a relationship), I am not driven to violence at the moment. But yeah, I have things to say about the attack and will post about it, I guess tomorrow.
Well, congratulations.. that's quite some news..
ikke vis trynet ditt på rema 1000 wergeland en gang til. du kommer til å få bank menst du slår inn 710!
ikke vis trynet ditt på rema 1000 wergeland en gang til. du kommer til å få bank.
Daruѕh knows how to use collаgen supplements.
Here is my site : botox sydney
Post a Comment